From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?=) Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 21:37:46 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v11 0/3] Another round of ARMv7-M patches In-Reply-To: <516EDEDA.1000108@arm.com> References: <1366215299-31969-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <516EDEDA.1000108@arm.com> Message-ID: <20130417193746.GR30416@pengutronix.de> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hello, On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 06:41:46PM +0100, Jonathan Austin wrote: > The only comment I have left is that I'd really like the > BASEADDRESS_V7M_SCB namespaced like the rest of the V7M defines The idea behind this naming is that V7M_SCB_BASEADDRESS is in the same namespace as V7M_SCB_CPUID so I opened a new namespace for base addresses. Don't you like it only because it's new? Do others have thoughts here? > With that said, please feel free to add for the series: > > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Austin > Tested-by: Jonathan Austin