From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2013 10:54:35 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: Fix is_gpmc_muxed warning for H4 In-Reply-To: <20130418175303.7436.75241.stgit@muffinssi.local> References: <20130418175303.7436.75241.stgit@muffinssi.local> Message-ID: <20130418175435.7436.60372.stgit@muffinssi.local> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Fix the following error by moving the function to be within the smc91x related ifdef as that's the only user: arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-h4.c:238: warning: ?is_gpmc_muxed? defined but not used Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren --- arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-h4.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-h4.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-h4.c index 69c0acf..f745cae 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-h4.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-h4.c @@ -229,6 +229,8 @@ static u32 get_sysboot_value(void) OMAP2_SYSBOOT_1_MASK | OMAP2_SYSBOOT_0_MASK)); } +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC91X) + /* H4-2420's always used muxed mode, H4-2422's always use non-muxed * * Note: OMAP-GIT doesn't correctly do is_cpu_omap2422 and is_cpu_omap2423 @@ -246,8 +248,6 @@ static u32 is_gpmc_muxed(void) return 0; } -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SMC91X) - static struct omap_smc91x_platform_data board_smc91x_data = { .cs = 1, .gpio_irq = 92,