From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: Initial defconfig for APM X-Gene SOC family
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2013 18:31:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130422173116.GD9602@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2165570.9Zy5vrhoIa@wuerfel>
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 08:35:14AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 20 April 2013 12:45:29 Vinayak Kale wrote:
> > This patch adds initial defconfig for APM X-Gene SOC family.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kumar Sankaran <ksankaran@apm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Loc Ho <lho@apm.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Feng Kan <fkan@apm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/configs/xgene_defconfig | 93 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/configs/xgene_defconfig
>
> Could you modify the regular defconfig to enable everything you need instead
> of adding another one? Since all the code is interoperable, I think we
> should not need a defconfig per soc.
That's good as we can get any automatic builds using defconfig to test
all the platforms. The only issue I see is that as the number of SoCs
grows, if you only need to select a single SoC you could end up with
features enabled for other platforms.
A way around this would be for such features to be enabled by an ARCH_*
entry in arch/arm64/Kconfig (or depending on them) so that we don't get
the values set in the (minimal) defconfig.
Another option would be to avoid any ARCH_* arch/arm64/Kconfig entries
entirely and use per-SoC defconfigs, together with an overall defconfig
including all SoCs.
I would go for the first choice with Kconfig ARCH_* entries, that's the
closest to arch/arm/ as well, though there are virtual platforms like
kvmtool which do not require a specific ARCH_ option. For vexpress I had
to add ARCH_VEXPRESS since it relies code under drivers/ which is
conditionally compiled based on this option.
--
Catalin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-22 17:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-20 7:15 [PATCH 0/4] arm64: Initial patch-set for APM X-Gene SOC family Vinayak Kale
2013-04-20 7:15 ` [PATCH 1/4] arm64: Add Kconfig option " Vinayak Kale
2013-04-20 7:15 ` [PATCH 2/4] arm64: Initial defconfig " Vinayak Kale
2013-04-20 7:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-20 9:31 ` Vinayak Kale
2013-04-20 10:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-22 17:31 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2013-04-22 19:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-20 7:15 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm64: Add defines for APM ARMv8 implementation Vinayak Kale
2013-04-20 7:15 ` [PATCH 4/4] arm64: Add initial DTS for APM X-Gene Storm SOC and APM Mustang board Vinayak Kale
2013-04-20 7:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-20 9:19 ` Vinayak Kale
2013-04-22 11:14 ` Mark Rutland
2013-04-22 12:23 ` Vinayak Kale
2013-04-22 12:59 ` Mark Rutland
2013-04-22 13:27 ` Vinayak Kale
2013-04-22 20:59 ` Rob Herring
2013-04-23 5:27 ` Vinayak Kale
2013-04-23 18:11 ` Olof Johansson
2013-04-24 6:21 ` Vinayak Kale
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130422173116.GD9602@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).