From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: broonie@kernel.org (Mark Brown) Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2013 16:56:30 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: don't call of_dma_request_slave_channel directly In-Reply-To: <1366732475-479886-3-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> References: <1366732475-479886-1-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> <1366732475-479886-3-git-send-email-arnd@arndb.de> Message-ID: <20130423155629.GS5019@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 05:54:33PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > The exported interface for device drivers is dma_request_slave_channel, > not of_dma_request_slave_channel. The former does not depend on device > tree but also works with ACPI and other interfaces providing an > abstraction for DMA channels. > This fixes link errors when building ALSA as a loadable module. This has already been changed separately, I'm surprised this applies against current code. Though one does have to wonder why it's in the header file if it's not a supported API... -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: