From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette) Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2013 09:28:47 -0700 Subject: [PATCH V4 1/6] clk: OMAP: introduce device tree binding to kernel clock data In-Reply-To: <20130414211917.GA3275@snafu> References: <1365807278-554-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <1365807278-554-2-git-send-email-nm@ti.com> <20130412233142.GE10155@atomide.com> <20130412233900.GA1599@kahuna> <20130413172210.GM10155@atomide.com> <20130414211917.GA3275@snafu> Message-ID: <20130424162847.8998.73264@quantum> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Quoting Nishanth Menon (2013-04-14 14:19:17) > Overall strategy introduced here is simple: a clock node described in > device tree blob is used to identify the exact clock provided in the > SoC specific data. This is then linked back using of_clk_add_provider > to the device node to be accessible by of_clk_get. > > Based on discussion contributions from Roger Quadros, Grygorii Strashko > and others. > > Cc: Kevin Hilman > Cc: Mike Turquette > Cc: Paul Walmsley > [tony at atomide.com: co-developed] > Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren > Signed-off-by: Nishanth Menon I can take this into clk-next after the merge window. Please refresh it for -rc1 as we discussed on irc. As an aside, will Tero's series for migrating to drivers/clk/omap[1] and Rajendra's patch for registering clocks late[2] be refreshed after the merge window? It would be nice to combine these efforts. Thanks, Mike [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.arm.omap/95948 [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg231288.html