From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 04/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Amalgamate DMA source and destination channel numbers
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:06:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130425090612.GC4623@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdaauDYTdoBHGG9FO4kKqvCYyCrjY8EGWs5gAQWErGW6_A@mail.gmail.com>
> > Devices which utilise DMA tend to use the same channel numbers for
> > transmitting and receiving. For this reason and the fact that it'll
> > decrease the burden of platform data passed to each device, we're
> > amalgamating source and destination device types.
>
> I don't think this explains what the patch is actually doing.
>
> Instead describe this:
>
> > @@ -56,8 +54,7 @@ static struct stedma40_chan_cfg msp1_dma_rx = {
> > .high_priority = true,
> > .dir = STEDMA40_PERIPH_TO_MEM,
> >
> > - .src_dev_type = DB8500_DMA_DEV30_MSP3_RX,
> > - .dst_dev_type = STEDMA40_DEV_DST_MEMORY,
> > + .dev_type = DB8500_DMA_DEV30_MSP3,
> (...)
>
> What the message should say is that we're encoding pairs of
> information for sources and destinations. Since every such
> entry contains a .dir entry stating the direction of the transfer
> it is implicit whether the channel is for RX or TX and this is what
> you're exploiting in this patch.
>
> So channel numbers (as mentioned in the commit) is not
> the key issue here.
Channel numbers should really be device types in the commit
message. I'll expand using your explanation too though.
> Now we should ask ourselves why it was done like this from
> the beginning. The reason is that DMA40 supports device-to-device
> DMA, so if you encoded one device in .src_dev_type and another
> device in .dst_dev_type and set .dir to
> STEDMA40_PERIPH_TO_PERIPH (which as you can see is
> defined in <linux/platform_data/dma-ste-dma40.h>) you get a
> device to device transfer.
>
> Are we now sacrificing that ability on the altar of simplification?
>
> I actually think not, but that we should do periph-to-periph transfers
> in some other way, and that the .dir attribute should go away from
> the struct stedma40_chan_cfg as well but I'm not entirely sure.
> Someone else?
Although the DMA40 device supports device-to-device transfers, Linux
does not, so this subject is moot AFAICT.
> (...)
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c
> > @@ -167,25 +167,25 @@ static void __init db8500_add_gpios(struct device *parent)
> > }
> >
> > static int usb_db8500_rx_dma_cfg[] = {
> > - DB8500_DMA_DEV38_USB_OTG_IEP_1_9,
> > - DB8500_DMA_DEV37_USB_OTG_IEP_2_10,
> > - DB8500_DMA_DEV36_USB_OTG_IEP_3_11,
> > - DB8500_DMA_DEV19_USB_OTG_IEP_4_12,
> > - DB8500_DMA_DEV18_USB_OTG_IEP_5_13,
> > - DB8500_DMA_DEV17_USB_OTG_IEP_6_14,
> > - DB8500_DMA_DEV16_USB_OTG_IEP_7_15,
> > - DB8500_DMA_DEV39_USB_OTG_IEP_8
> > + DB8500_DMA_DEV38_USB_OTG_IEP_AND_OEP_1_9,
> > + DB8500_DMA_DEV37_USB_OTG_IEP_AND_OEP_2_10,
> > + DB8500_DMA_DEV36_USB_OTG_IEP_AND_OEP_3_11,
> > + DB8500_DMA_DEV19_USB_OTG_IEP_AND_OEP_4_12,
> > + DB8500_DMA_DEV18_USB_OTG_IEP_AND_OEP_5_13,
> > + DB8500_DMA_DEV17_USB_OTG_IEP_AND_OEP_6_14,
> > + DB8500_DMA_DEV16_USB_OTG_IEP_AND_OEP_7_15,
> > + DB8500_DMA_DEV39_USB_OTG_IEP_AND_OEP_8
> > };
> >
> > static int usb_db8500_tx_dma_cfg[] = {
> > - DB8500_DMA_DEV38_USB_OTG_OEP_1_9,
> > - DB8500_DMA_DEV37_USB_OTG_OEP_2_10,
> > - DB8500_DMA_DEV36_USB_OTG_OEP_3_11,
> > - DB8500_DMA_DEV19_USB_OTG_OEP_4_12,
> > - DB8500_DMA_DEV18_USB_OTG_OEP_5_13,
> > - DB8500_DMA_DEV17_USB_OTG_OEP_6_14,
> > - DB8500_DMA_DEV16_USB_OTG_OEP_7_15,
> > - DB8500_DMA_DEV39_USB_OTG_OEP_8
> > + DB8500_DMA_DEV38_USB_OTG_IEP_AND_OEP_1_9,
> > + DB8500_DMA_DEV37_USB_OTG_IEP_AND_OEP_2_10,
> > + DB8500_DMA_DEV36_USB_OTG_IEP_AND_OEP_3_11,
> > + DB8500_DMA_DEV19_USB_OTG_IEP_AND_OEP_4_12,
> > + DB8500_DMA_DEV18_USB_OTG_IEP_AND_OEP_5_13,
> > + DB8500_DMA_DEV17_USB_OTG_IEP_AND_OEP_6_14,
> > + DB8500_DMA_DEV16_USB_OTG_IEP_AND_OEP_7_15,
> > + DB8500_DMA_DEV39_USB_OTG_IEP_AND_OEP_8
> > };
>
>
> If you're doing this change, and after this RX and TX has no semantical
> meaning for these lists, join these two config lists
> into one.
I agree. See patch: ARM: ux500: Strip out duplicate USB DMA configuration
> (...)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-ux500/usb.c b/arch/arm/mach-ux500/usb.c
> > static u32 d40_chan_has_events(struct d40_chan *d40c)
> > @@ -1744,8 +1740,6 @@ static int d40_validate_conf(struct d40_chan *d40c,
> > struct stedma40_chan_cfg *conf)
> > {
> > int res = 0;
> > - u32 dst_event_group = D40_TYPE_TO_GROUP(conf->dst_dev_type);
> > - u32 src_event_group = D40_TYPE_TO_GROUP(conf->src_dev_type);
>
> Please explain why this is not important to check anymore, I'm not
> following.
>
> > if (conf->dir == STEDMA40_MEM_TO_PERIPH &&
> > - dst_event_group == STEDMA40_DEV_DST_MEMORY) {
> > - chan_err(d40c, "Invalid dst\n");
> > + d40c->base->plat_data->dev_tx[conf->dev_type] == 0 &&
> > + d40c->runtime_addr == 0) {
> > + chan_err(d40c, "Invalid TX channel address (%d)\n",
> > + conf->dev_type);
>
> Like here. We are checking for inconsistency between group
> and channel direction, why is it no longer important to check this?
I'm not entirely sure how this ever worked:
#define D40_TYPE_TO_GROUP(type) (type / 16)
#define STEDMA40_DEV_DST_MEMORY (-1)
(dev_type / 16) == -1
What number would dev_type have to be for this to be true? -16?
> > if (conf->dir == STEDMA40_PERIPH_TO_MEM &&
> > - src_event_group == STEDMA40_DEV_SRC_MEMORY) {
> > - chan_err(d40c, "Invalid src\n");
> > - res = -EINVAL;
> > - }
As above.
> > - if (src_event_group == STEDMA40_DEV_SRC_MEMORY &&
> > - dst_event_group == STEDMA40_DEV_DST_MEMORY && is_log) {
> > - chan_err(d40c, "No event line\n");
> > - res = -EINVAL;
> > - }
We still check for this.
> > - if (conf->dir == STEDMA40_PERIPH_TO_PERIPH &&
> > - (src_event_group != dst_event_group)) {
> > - chan_err(d40c, "Invalid event group\n");
> > + d40c->base->plat_data->dev_rx[conf->dev_type] == 0 &&
> > + d40c->runtime_addr == 0) {
> > + chan_err(d40c, "Invalid RX channel address (%d)\n",
> > + conf->dev_type);
>
> Same here.
I stopped all 'dev_src/dev_dest' comparisons, as there is only 'dev' now.
> (...)
> > @@ -2062,7 +2035,7 @@ static int d40_free_dma(struct d40_chan *d40c)
> > {
> >
> > int res = 0;
> > - u32 event;
> > + u32 event = D40_TYPE_TO_EVENT(d40c->dma_cfg.dev_type);
> > struct d40_phy_res *phy = d40c->phy_chan;
> > bool is_src;
> >
> > @@ -2081,13 +2054,11 @@ static int d40_free_dma(struct d40_chan *d40c)
> > }
> >
> > if (d40c->dma_cfg.dir == STEDMA40_MEM_TO_PERIPH ||
> > - d40c->dma_cfg.dir == STEDMA40_MEM_TO_MEM) {
> > - event = D40_TYPE_TO_EVENT(d40c->dma_cfg.dst_dev_type);
> > + d40c->dma_cfg.dir == STEDMA40_MEM_TO_MEM)
>
> Why did you just stop checking dma_cfg.dir for == STEDMA40_MEM_TO_MEM
> above?
That's not what this is doing. STEDMA40_MEM_TO_MEM is still there.
This patch is doing this:
+ u32 event = D40_TYPE_TO_EVENT(d40c->dma_cfg.dev_type);
<snip>
- event = D40_TYPE_TO_EVENT(d40c->dma_cfg.dst_dev_type);
- event = D40_TYPE_TO_EVENT(d40c->dma_cfg.src_dev_type);
> And why is dma_cfg.dir suddenly hardcoded to MEM_TO_MEM??
It's not. Look again. :)
> This seems like a totally unrelated change and should it be done
> it need to be a separate patch with a separate explanation
> AFAICT.
>
> This seems to happen in some other places too,
If you could point those out, I'll re-evaluate, or explain.
> and I find it
> very hard to follow the changes here ... can you please consider
> splitting the changes to groups and types semantics into a separate
> patch?
Can you read the patch again and reconsider please?
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-04-25 9:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 168+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-04-18 10:11 [PATCH 00/32] dmaengine: Refactor the DMA40 driver Lee Jones
2013-04-18 10:11 ` [PATCH 01/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Assign memcpy channels in the driver Lee Jones
2013-04-22 9:22 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-25 9:20 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:11 ` [PATCH 02/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Move default memcpy configs into " Lee Jones
2013-04-22 9:21 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-24 14:44 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:11 ` [PATCH 03/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Use the BIT macro to replace ugly '(1 << x)'s Lee Jones
2013-04-18 10:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-18 11:00 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-18 12:16 ` [PATCH 03/32 v2] " Lee Jones
2013-04-22 10:13 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-24 14:54 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-24 15:08 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-24 15:09 ` [PATCH 03/32] " Lee Jones
2013-04-24 15:11 ` [PATCH 03/32 v3] " Lee Jones
2013-04-24 19:24 ` Rabin Vincent
2013-04-25 8:13 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-26 11:39 ` [PATCH 03/32 v4] " Lee Jones
2013-04-26 15:04 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:11 ` [PATCH 04/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Amalgamate DMA source and destination channel numbers Lee Jones
2013-04-25 8:06 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-25 8:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-25 8:55 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-25 9:06 ` Lee Jones [this message]
2013-04-25 12:43 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-25 13:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-25 13:21 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-25 13:20 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-25 13:24 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-26 14:28 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-18 10:11 ` [PATCH 05/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Supply macros to resolve 'src' and 'dst' directions Lee Jones
2013-04-18 10:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-22 9:42 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-22 10:27 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-22 10:19 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-24 8:53 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-25 8:22 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-25 9:19 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-18 10:11 ` [PATCH 06/32] ARM: ux500: Strip out duplicate USB DMA configuration Lee Jones
2013-04-18 10:51 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-25 8:24 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:11 ` [PATCH 07/32] ARM: ux500: Supply address location names for the DMA40 DMA controller Lee Jones
2013-04-18 10:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-18 11:01 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-18 11:09 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-25 8:26 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-25 9:17 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-25 12:45 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:11 ` [PATCH 08/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Optimise local MAX() macro Lee Jones
2013-04-18 10:46 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-18 11:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-18 11:19 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-22 10:10 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-22 10:53 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-24 8:49 ` [PATCH 08/32 v2] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Remove home-brew " Lee Jones
2013-04-25 12:48 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-01 14:28 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-25 8:36 ` [PATCH 08/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Optimise local " Linus Walleij
2013-04-25 9:15 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-18 10:11 ` [PATCH 09/32] ARM: ux500: Remove unused 'data_width' attributes from SDI DMA configs Lee Jones
2013-04-25 8:44 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-25 9:14 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-25 12:49 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-25 13:13 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-18 10:11 ` [PATCH 10/32] ARM: ux500: Remove unused 'data_width' attributes from SSP " Lee Jones
2013-04-25 8:45 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:11 ` [PATCH 11/32] ARM: ux500: Remove unused 'data_width' attributes from UART " Lee Jones
2013-04-25 8:45 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:11 ` [PATCH 12/32] ARM: ux500: Remove superfluous 'psize' attribute from Audio platform data Lee Jones
2013-04-25 9:00 ` Linus Walleij
2013-05-01 14:42 ` Lee Jones
2013-05-02 8:38 ` Lee Jones
2013-05-03 13:57 ` Linus Walleij
2013-06-10 9:04 ` Lee Jones
2013-06-10 9:12 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-18 10:11 ` [PATCH 13/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Calculate number of logical channels from physical ones Lee Jones
2013-04-22 9:23 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-22 10:11 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-25 9:13 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-25 9:29 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-25 12:51 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:11 ` [PATCH 14/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Remove 'always true' checking Lee Jones
2013-04-18 10:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-22 9:44 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-25 9:17 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-25 9:24 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-18 10:11 ` [PATCH 15/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Separate Logical Global Interrupt Mask (GIM) unmasking Lee Jones
2013-04-18 10:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-18 10:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-22 9:51 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-22 10:40 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-24 8:51 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-25 11:00 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:11 ` [PATCH 16/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Remove unnecessary call to d40_phy_cfg() Lee Jones
2013-04-18 10:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-22 9:52 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-25 11:09 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:11 ` [PATCH 17/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Remove redundant argument from d40_phy_cfg() Lee Jones
2013-04-22 9:34 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-22 10:18 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-25 11:14 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-24 8:55 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-25 11:12 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:12 ` [PATCH 18/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Don't configure runtime configurable setup during allocate Lee Jones
2013-04-25 11:15 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:12 ` [PATCH 19/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Move more setup into the configuration routines Lee Jones
2013-04-22 9:37 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-25 11:17 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:12 ` [PATCH 20/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Move rev error-check up to revision acquisition Lee Jones
2013-04-22 9:41 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-25 11:17 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:12 ` [PATCH 21/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Also report the number of logical channels Lee Jones
2013-04-22 9:36 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-22 10:14 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-22 9:48 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-22 10:37 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-22 10:23 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-22 10:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-04-24 8:35 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-24 8:39 ` [PATCH 21/32 v2] " Lee Jones
2013-04-25 11:20 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:12 ` [PATCH 22/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Allocate plat_data on declaration Lee Jones
2013-04-22 9:38 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-22 9:40 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-25 11:22 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:12 ` [PATCH 23/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Allow driver to be probe()able when DT is enabled Lee Jones
2013-04-18 10:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-22 10:02 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-25 11:24 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:12 ` [PATCH 24/32] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Supply full Device Tree parsing support Lee Jones
2013-04-18 11:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-18 11:31 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-18 11:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-18 11:47 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-18 12:23 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-18 11:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-18 12:12 ` [PATCH 24/32 v2] " Lee Jones
2013-04-18 12:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-18 13:43 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-18 14:17 ` [PATCH 24/32 v3] " Lee Jones
2013-04-18 21:53 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-22 10:18 ` Vinod Koul
2013-04-25 11:33 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-22 10:17 ` [PATCH 24/32 v2] " Vinod Koul
2013-04-22 10:16 ` [PATCH 24/32] " Vinod Koul
2013-04-18 10:12 ` [PATCH 25/32] ARM: ux500: Setup the DMA40 driver's DT node using the new DMA API Lee Jones
2013-04-18 11:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-25 11:35 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:12 ` [PATCH 26/32] ARM: ux500: Supply UART's DMA configuration via Device Tree Lee Jones
2013-04-25 11:36 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:12 ` [PATCH 27/32] ARM: ux500: Stop registering DMA40 from platform data when DT is enabled Lee Jones
2013-04-25 11:37 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:12 ` [PATCH 28/32] ARM: ux500: Pass remnant platform data though to DMA40 driver Lee Jones
2013-04-18 11:11 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-25 11:39 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:12 ` [PATCH 29/32] ARM: ux500: Stop passing UART's platform data for Device Tree boots Lee Jones
2013-04-25 11:41 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:12 ` [PATCH 30/32] ARM: ux500: Supply MMC DMA configuration via Device Tree Lee Jones
2013-04-25 11:43 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-25 11:49 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-25 12:56 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-25 13:11 ` Lee Jones
2013-04-18 10:12 ` [PATCH 31/32] ARM: ux500: Stop passing MMC's platform data for Device Tree boots Lee Jones
2013-04-25 11:44 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-18 10:12 ` [PATCH 32/32] ARM: ux500: Move SDI (MMC) and UART devices under more descriptive heading Lee Jones
2013-04-25 11:46 ` Linus Walleij
2013-04-26 13:42 ` Lee Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130425090612.GC4623@gmail.com \
--to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).