public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP-USB: Fix possible memory leak
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 09:33:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130503083320.GI21614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130503083009.GA19377@arwen.pp.htv.fi>

On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 11:30:09AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 09:15:10AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > > This is exactly why we have platform_device_alloc(),
> > > > platform_device_register_full() and friends - so that people don't have to
> > > > fsck around with kzalloc themselves and get it wrong like the above does.
> > > > 
> > > > Would you like me to pass your details to gregkh for another one of his
> > > > public humilation exercises over basic kernel programming stuff? :)
> > > 
> > > How about we pass yours for not reading the patch before flaming ? Note
> > > that $SUBJECT is *not* touching at all that line which kzallocs a
> > > platform_device. Wrong as it is, it's not part of $SUBJECT.
> > 
> > It's really simple.  You do not use k*alloc with platform devices.  And
> 
> agree, no discussions here
> 
> > you reject any patch which contains that, and point it out to the patch
> > author.
> > 
> > It really doesn't matter if there's a kfree or not.  The fact is you do
> > not allow it in any situation, because such bad practises get copied
> > and then you end up with kfree's.
> > 
> > How about you gain an understanding of this stuff and why this stuff is
> > soo "hot".
> 
> how about you look at the git log to figure out I had nothing to do with
> that original patch which added k*alloc to the pdev ?

How about you realise I haven't got time to fuck around like that at the
moment, so in the interests of getting people to fix the glaring error
I commented on it instead in a relevant thread in the hope that some
prat like you would take notice and ask for it to be fixed by someone
working on the driver.

  reply	other threads:[~2013-05-03  8:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-02 16:03 [PATCH] ARM: OMAP-USB: Fix possible memory leak Alexander Shiyan
2013-05-02 16:24 ` Nishanth Menon
2013-05-02 16:28   ` Re[2]: " Alexander Shiyan
2013-05-02 16:40     ` Felipe Balbi
2013-05-02 23:13       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-03  6:21         ` Felipe Balbi
2013-05-03  6:25           ` Felipe Balbi
2013-05-03  6:25             ` Felipe Balbi
2013-05-03  8:15           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-03  8:30             ` Felipe Balbi
2013-05-03  8:33               ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2013-05-03  8:32           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-03  8:39             ` Felipe Balbi
2013-05-03  8:43               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-05-02 19:52   ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130503083320.GI21614@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox