From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 12:57:39 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/5 v2] dmaengine: ste_dma40: Allow memcpy channels to be configured from DT In-Reply-To: References: <1367336497-10650-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20130501095243.GD25256@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20130503115739.GJ24153@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, 03 May 2013, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > > At this moment in time the memcpy channels which can be used by the D40 > > are fixed, as each supported platform in Mainline uses the same ones. > > However, platforms do exist which don't follow this convention, so > > these will need to be tailored. Fortunately, these platforms will be DT > > only, so this change has very little impact on platform data. > > > > Cc: Vinod Koul > > Cc: Dan Williams > > Cc: Per Forlin > > Cc: Rabin Vincent > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > > Real nice! > > But can you split this in two patches: one that changes > drivers/dma/ste_dma40* and one sequel patch that changes > Documentation/* and arch/arm/boot/dts/* so I can merge them > out-of-order? > > I am trying this development cycle to split changes to the > device trees and bindings off from the rest of the patches > becaused it caused me a mess last cycle. I was under the impression that the documentation went with the bindings, rather than the Device Tree. Am I wrong? -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog