[GIT PULL] Two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series

[GIT PULL] Two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series

[Linus Walleij]

Hi ARM SoC folks,

here are two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series, please pull
them in. Since -rc1 is not out this is based on Torvald's
HEAD from yesterday.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

The following changes since commit ce857229e0c3adc211944a13a5579ef84fd7b4af:

  ipc: fix GETALL/IPC_RM race for sysv semaphores (2013-05-02 19:51:31 -0700)

are available in the git repository at:

  git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-stericsson.git
tags/ux500-fixes-for-v3.10-1

for you to fetch changes up to 9b7a2104e7e5dd02210ac26f5dc488ceb29778f7:

  ARM: ux500: Rid ignored return value of regulator_enable() compiler
warning (2013-05-03 10:27:12 +0200)

----------------------------------------------------------------
Two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series:
- SoC ID fix
- Fix errorpath for proximity regulator

----------------------------------------------------------------
Fabio Baltieri (1):
      ARM: ux500: read the correct soc_id number

Lee Jones (1):
      ARM: ux500: Rid ignored return value of regulator_enable()
compiler warning

 arch/arm/mach-ux500/board-mop500.c | 4 ++--
 arch/arm/mach-ux500/cpu-db8500.c   | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

[GIT PULL] Two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday 03 May 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
> Hi ARM SoC folks,
> 
> here are two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series, please pull
> them in. Since -rc1 is not out this is based on Torvald's
> HEAD from yesterday.

We try hard to avoid doing bug fixes on top of random HEADs.
Can you send these on top of the minimum set of branches?

	Arnd

[GIT PULL] Two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series

[Linus Walleij]

On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> On Friday 03 May 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> Hi ARM SoC folks,
>>
>> here are two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series, please pull
>> them in. Since -rc1 is not out this is based on Torvald's
>> HEAD from yesterday.
>
> We try hard to avoid doing bug fixes on top of random HEADs.
> Can you send these on top of the minimum set of branches?

I think I'll just wait for -rc1.

It's not *that* urgent, just wanted to clean my desk.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[GIT PULL] Two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Friday 03 May 2013 22:43:10 Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Friday 03 May 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> Hi ARM SoC folks,
> >>
> >> here are two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series, please pull
> >> them in. Since -rc1 is not out this is based on Torvald's
> >> HEAD from yesterday.
> >
> > We try hard to avoid doing bug fixes on top of random HEADs.
> > Can you send these on top of the minimum set of branches?
> 
> I think I'll just wait for -rc1.
> 
> It's not *that* urgent, just wanted to clean my desk.

Ok, sounds good.

	Arnd

[GIT PULL] Two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series

[Olof Johansson]

On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 10:43:10PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > On Friday 03 May 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> Hi ARM SoC folks,
> >>
> >> here are two ux500 fixes for the v3.10 series, please pull
> >> them in. Since -rc1 is not out this is based on Torvald's
> >> HEAD from yesterday.
> >
> > We try hard to avoid doing bug fixes on top of random HEADs.
> > Can you send these on top of the minimum set of branches?
> 
> I think I'll just wait for -rc1.
> 
> It's not *that* urgent, just wanted to clean my desk.

I've got a branch started at a non-rc for fixes right now, since we want some
of them in before the first -rc. So I'll cherry-pick these over while I'm at
it.


-Olof