From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: holt@sgi.com (Robin Holt) Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 04:50:14 -0500 Subject: [PATCH -v9 04/11] Move shutdown/reboot related functions to kernel/reboot.c In-Reply-To: <20130510000552.GX3658@sgi.com> References: <1368127405-112717-1-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com> <1368127405-112717-5-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com> <20130509135100.13947d1805a583703ee8488b@linux-foundation.org> <20130510000552.GX3658@sgi.com> Message-ID: <20130510095014.GY3658@sgi.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 07:05:53PM -0500, Robin Holt wrote: > On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 01:51:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Thu, 9 May 2013 14:23:18 -0500 Robin Holt wrote: > > > > > This patch is preparatory. It moves reboot related syscall, etc > > > functions from kernel/sys.c to kernel/reboot.c. > > > > This doesn't apply. > > Weird, I just grabbed a recent Linus kernel tree and all 11 applied. > I then did an update to linus' tree to commit 70eba4226 and now I get > rejects on arm. I will resubmit a -v10 fixed up shortly. I wonder what you are seeing. I get all 11 to apply fairly cleanly with only arch/arm/mach-imx/common.h getting conflicts on a commits after 009e63f which are related to context. Otherwise, they applied cleanly. I assume you removed the earlier version before trying to apply. I can resubmit (and will add Ingo's Acked-by), but am not sure it is going to help the situation. How would you like me to proceed? Robin