* [PATCH 01/20] ARM: sunxi: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 02/20] ARM: zynq: " Maxime Ripard
` (19 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for sunxi as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c
index 706ce35..08937a3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-sunxi/sunxi.c
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <linux/of_irq.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
@@ -117,7 +116,6 @@ static const char * const sunxi_board_dt_compat[] = {
DT_MACHINE_START(SUNXI_DT, "Allwinner A1X (Device Tree)")
.init_machine = sunxi_dt_init,
.map_io = sunxi_map_io,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = sunxi_timer_init,
.dt_compat = sunxi_board_dt_compat,
MACHINE_END
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 02/20] ARM: zynq: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 01/20] ARM: sunxi: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 15:49 ` Michal Simek
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 03/20] ARM: nomadik: " Maxime Ripard
` (18 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for zynq as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
---
arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
index 5bfe703..4c0199b8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
#include <linux/of_irq.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
#include <asm/mach/map.h>
@@ -106,7 +105,6 @@ static const char * const zynq_dt_match[] = {
MACHINE_START(XILINX_EP107, "Xilinx Zynq Platform")
.smp = smp_ops(zynq_smp_ops),
.map_io = zynq_map_io,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_machine = zynq_init_machine,
.init_time = zynq_timer_init,
.dt_compat = zynq_dt_match,
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 02/20] ARM: zynq: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 02/20] ARM: zynq: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:49 ` Michal Simek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Michal Simek @ 2013-05-14 15:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 05/14/2013 05:38 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for zynq as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> Acked-by: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
> index 5bfe703..4c0199b8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c
> @@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
> #include <linux/of_irq.h>
> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
>
> #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
> #include <asm/mach/map.h>
> @@ -106,7 +105,6 @@ static const char * const zynq_dt_match[] = {
> MACHINE_START(XILINX_EP107, "Xilinx Zynq Platform")
> .smp = smp_ops(zynq_smp_ops),
> .map_io = zynq_map_io,
> - .init_irq = irqchip_init,
> .init_machine = zynq_init_machine,
> .init_time = zynq_timer_init,
> .dt_compat = zynq_dt_match,
>
Subject should contain v2 but anyway I have added it my zynq repo.
Thanks,
Michal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 03/20] ARM: nomadik: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 01/20] ARM: sunxi: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 02/20] ARM: zynq: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 04/20] ARM: picoxcell: " Maxime Ripard
` (17 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for nomadik as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/mach-nomadik/cpu-8815.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-nomadik/cpu-8815.c b/arch/arm/mach-nomadik/cpu-8815.c
index 59f6ff5..46cce9b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-nomadik/cpu-8815.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-nomadik/cpu-8815.c
@@ -25,7 +25,6 @@
#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/platform_data/clk-nomadik.h>
#include <linux/platform_data/pinctrl-nomadik.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
@@ -323,7 +322,6 @@ static const char * cpu8815_board_compat[] = {
DT_MACHINE_START(NOMADIK_DT, "Nomadik STn8815")
.map_io = cpu8815_map_io,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = cpu8815_timer_init_of,
.init_machine = cpu8815_init_of,
.restart = cpu8815_restart,
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 04/20] ARM: picoxcell: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 03/20] ARM: nomadik: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 16:20 ` Jamie Iles
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 05/20] ARM: shmobile: ape6evm: " Maxime Ripard
` (16 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for picoxcell as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
index 70b441a..c2721ce 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
*/
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
@@ -87,7 +86,6 @@ static void picoxcell_wdt_restart(char mode, const char *cmd)
DT_MACHINE_START(PICOXCELL, "Picochip picoXcell")
.map_io = picoxcell_map_io,
.nr_irqs = NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = dw_apb_timer_init,
.init_machine = picoxcell_init_machine,
.dt_compat = picoxcell_dt_match,
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 04/20] ARM: picoxcell: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 04/20] ARM: picoxcell: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 16:20 ` Jamie Iles
2013-05-16 8:19 ` Maxime Ripard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Jamie Iles @ 2013-05-14 16:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Maxime,
Thanks for this, I'll add it to my tree. I've modified it slightly to
kill off the other irq includes, hopefully that's okay with you.
Thanks,
Jamie
8<---
>From 4b83f75a7af388aaf5f79ccf72c37074bc9166da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 17:38:37 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: picoxcell: Remove init_irq declaration in machine
description
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for picoxcell as well.
[ jiles: removed other, unused irq includes. ]
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Signed-off-by: Jamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c | 5 -----
1 file changed, 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
index f6f71bb..b069fa6 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-picoxcell/common.c
@@ -8,12 +8,8 @@
* All enquiries to support at picochip.com
*/
#include <linux/delay.h>
-#include <linux/irq.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
-#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
-#include <linux/of_irq.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/dw_apb_timer.h>
@@ -85,7 +81,6 @@ static void picoxcell_wdt_restart(char mode, const char *cmd)
DT_MACHINE_START(PICOXCELL, "Picochip picoXcell")
.map_io = picoxcell_map_io,
.nr_irqs = NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = dw_apb_timer_init,
.init_machine = picoxcell_init_machine,
.dt_compat = picoxcell_dt_match,
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 04/20] ARM: picoxcell: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 16:20 ` Jamie Iles
@ 2013-05-16 8:19 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-20 22:42 ` Jamie Iles
0 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-16 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Jamie,
Le 14/05/2013 18:20, Jamie Iles a ?crit :
> Hi Maxime,
>
> Thanks for this, I'll add it to my tree. I've modified it slightly to
> kill off the other irq includes, hopefully that's okay with you.
Yes, I was pretty conservative since I was not familiar with most of the
code, but yes, I'm fine with the changes.
Thank you,
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 04/20] ARM: picoxcell: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-16 8:19 ` Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-20 22:42 ` Jamie Iles
0 siblings, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Jamie Iles @ 2013-05-20 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:19:56AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi Jamie,
>
> Le 14/05/2013 18:20, Jamie Iles a ?crit :
> > Hi Maxime,
> >
> > Thanks for this, I'll add it to my tree. I've modified it slightly to
> > kill off the other irq includes, hopefully that's okay with you.
>
> Yes, I was pretty conservative since I was not familiar with most of the
> code, but yes, I'm fine with the changes.
Thanks Maxime, applied to picoxcell-next.
Jamie
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 05/20] ARM: shmobile: ape6evm: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 04/20] ARM: picoxcell: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-15 0:59 ` Simon Horman
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 06/20] ARM: shmobile: kzm9g: " Maxime Ripard
` (15 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for shmobile as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
index 55b8c9f..8dfbdba 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
#include <linux/gpio.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
@@ -87,7 +86,6 @@ static const char *ape6evm_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
};
DT_MACHINE_START(APE6EVM_DT, "ape6evm")
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = shmobile_timer_init,
.init_machine = ape6evm_add_standard_devices,
.dt_compat = ape6evm_boards_compat_dt,
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 05/20] ARM: shmobile: ape6evm: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 05/20] ARM: shmobile: ape6evm: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-15 0:59 ` Simon Horman
2013-05-15 1:46 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-05-15 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:38PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for shmobile as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> index 55b8c9f..8dfbdba 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
>
> #include <linux/gpio.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> @@ -87,7 +86,6 @@ static const char *ape6evm_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
> };
>
> DT_MACHINE_START(APE6EVM_DT, "ape6evm")
> - .init_irq = irqchip_init,
> .init_time = shmobile_timer_init,
> .init_machine = ape6evm_add_standard_devices,
> .dt_compat = ape6evm_boards_compat_dt,
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 05/20] ARM: shmobile: ape6evm: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-15 0:59 ` Simon Horman
@ 2013-05-15 1:46 ` Simon Horman
2013-05-15 1:49 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-05-15 1:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:59:07AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:38PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> > specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> > the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> > declaration for shmobile as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> > index 55b8c9f..8dfbdba 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> > @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
> >
> > #include <linux/gpio.h>
> > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > #include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > @@ -87,7 +86,6 @@ static const char *ape6evm_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
> > };
> >
> > DT_MACHINE_START(APE6EVM_DT, "ape6evm")
> > - .init_irq = irqchip_init,
> > .init_time = shmobile_timer_init,
> > .init_machine = ape6evm_add_standard_devices,
> > .dt_compat = ape6evm_boards_compat_dt,
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Sorry, what I should have said is:
Queued up for v3.11 in the boards-spe6evm branch of my renesas tree
on kernel.org. It is included in the renesas-next-20130515 tag of
that tree and should appear in linux-next in the not to distant future.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 05/20] ARM: shmobile: ape6evm: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-15 1:46 ` Simon Horman
@ 2013-05-15 1:49 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-05-15 1:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:46:04AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:59:07AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:38PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> > > specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> > > the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> > > declaration for shmobile as well.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c | 2 --
> > > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> > > index 55b8c9f..8dfbdba 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-ape6evm.c
> > > @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
> > >
> > > #include <linux/gpio.h>
> > > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > > -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> > > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > > #include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
> > > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > @@ -87,7 +86,6 @@ static const char *ape6evm_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
> > > };
> > >
> > > DT_MACHINE_START(APE6EVM_DT, "ape6evm")
> > > - .init_irq = irqchip_init,
> > > .init_time = shmobile_timer_init,
> > > .init_machine = ape6evm_add_standard_devices,
> > > .dt_compat = ape6evm_boards_compat_dt,
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
>
> Sorry, what I should have said is:
>
> Queued up for v3.11 in the boards-spe6evm branch of my renesas tree
s/spe6evm/ape6evm/
> on kernel.org. It is included in the renesas-next-20130515 tag of
> that tree and should appear in linux-next in the not to distant future.
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-sh" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 06/20] ARM: shmobile: kzm9g: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 05/20] ARM: shmobile: ape6evm: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-15 0:59 ` Simon Horman
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 07/20] ARM: shmobile: lager: " Maxime Ripard
` (14 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for shmobile as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c
index aefa50d..b7ee96e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c
@@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
#include <linux/gpio.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/input.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
@@ -100,7 +99,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(KZM9G_DT, "kzm9g-reference")
.map_io = sh73a0_map_io,
.init_early = sh73a0_init_delay,
.nr_irqs = NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_machine = kzm_init,
.init_time = shmobile_timer_init,
.dt_compat = kzm9g_boards_compat_dt,
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 06/20] ARM: shmobile: kzm9g: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 06/20] ARM: shmobile: kzm9g: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-15 0:59 ` Simon Horman
2013-05-15 1:46 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-05-15 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:39PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for shmobile as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c
> index aefa50d..b7ee96e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c
> @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
> #include <linux/gpio.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> #include <linux/input.h>
> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> #include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
> @@ -100,7 +99,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(KZM9G_DT, "kzm9g-reference")
> .map_io = sh73a0_map_io,
> .init_early = sh73a0_init_delay,
> .nr_irqs = NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
> - .init_irq = irqchip_init,
> .init_machine = kzm_init,
> .init_time = shmobile_timer_init,
> .dt_compat = kzm9g_boards_compat_dt,
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 06/20] ARM: shmobile: kzm9g: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-15 0:59 ` Simon Horman
@ 2013-05-15 1:46 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-05-15 1:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:59:17AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:39PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> > specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> > the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> > declaration for shmobile as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c
> > index aefa50d..b7ee96e 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-kzm9g-reference.c
> > @@ -24,7 +24,6 @@
> > #include <linux/gpio.h>
> > #include <linux/io.h>
> > #include <linux/irq.h>
> > -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> > #include <linux/input.h>
> > #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > #include <linux/pinctrl/machine.h>
> > @@ -100,7 +99,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(KZM9G_DT, "kzm9g-reference")
> > .map_io = sh73a0_map_io,
> > .init_early = sh73a0_init_delay,
> > .nr_irqs = NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
> > - .init_irq = irqchip_init,
> > .init_machine = kzm_init,
> > .init_time = shmobile_timer_init,
> > .dt_compat = kzm9g_boards_compat_dt,
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Sorry, what I should have said is:
Queued up for v3.11 in the boards-kzm9g branch of my renesas tree
on kernel.org. It is included in the renesas-next-20130515 tag of
that tree and should appear in linux-next in the not to distant future.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 07/20] ARM: shmobile: lager: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 06/20] ARM: shmobile: kzm9g: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-15 0:59 ` Simon Horman
2013-05-15 1:46 ` Simon Horman
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 08/20] ARM: shmobile: emev2: " Maxime Ripard
` (13 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 2 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for shmobile as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c
index f587187..b7488b8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
*/
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <mach/common.h>
@@ -39,7 +38,6 @@ static const char *lager_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
};
DT_MACHINE_START(LAGER_DT, "lager")
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = r8a7790_timer_init,
.init_machine = lager_add_standard_devices,
.dt_compat = lager_boards_compat_dt,
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 07/20] ARM: shmobile: lager: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 07/20] ARM: shmobile: lager: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-15 0:59 ` Simon Horman
2013-05-15 1:46 ` Simon Horman
1 sibling, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-05-15 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:40PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for shmobile as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c
> index f587187..b7488b8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <mach/common.h>
> @@ -39,7 +38,6 @@ static const char *lager_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
> };
>
> DT_MACHINE_START(LAGER_DT, "lager")
> - .init_irq = irqchip_init,
> .init_time = r8a7790_timer_init,
> .init_machine = lager_add_standard_devices,
> .dt_compat = lager_boards_compat_dt,
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 07/20] ARM: shmobile: lager: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 07/20] ARM: shmobile: lager: " Maxime Ripard
2013-05-15 0:59 ` Simon Horman
@ 2013-05-15 1:46 ` Simon Horman
1 sibling, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-05-15 1:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:40PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for shmobile as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c
> index f587187..b7488b8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/board-lager.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <mach/common.h>
> @@ -39,7 +38,6 @@ static const char *lager_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
> };
>
> DT_MACHINE_START(LAGER_DT, "lager")
> - .init_irq = irqchip_init,
> .init_time = r8a7790_timer_init,
> .init_machine = lager_add_standard_devices,
> .dt_compat = lager_boards_compat_dt,
Sorry, what I should have said is:
Queued up for v3.11 in the boards-lager branch of my renesas tree
on kernel.org. It is included in the renesas-next-20130515 tag of
that tree and should appear in linux-next in the not to distant future.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 08/20] ARM: shmobile: emev2: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 07/20] ARM: shmobile: lager: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-15 0:59 ` Simon Horman
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 09/20] ARM: shmobile: r8a73a4: " Maxime Ripard
` (12 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for shmobile as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
index 899a86c..66694e0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/platform_data/gpio-em.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
@@ -454,7 +453,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(EMEV2_DT, "Generic Emma Mobile EV2 (Flattened Device Tree)")
.smp = smp_ops(emev2_smp_ops),
.init_early = emev2_init_delay,
.nr_irqs = NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_machine = emev2_add_standard_devices_dt,
.dt_compat = emev2_boards_compat_dt,
MACHINE_END
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 08/20] ARM: shmobile: emev2: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 08/20] ARM: shmobile: emev2: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-15 0:59 ` Simon Horman
2013-05-15 1:47 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-05-15 0:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:41PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for shmobile as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
> index 899a86c..66694e0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/platform_data/gpio-em.h>
> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> @@ -454,7 +453,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(EMEV2_DT, "Generic Emma Mobile EV2 (Flattened Device Tree)")
> .smp = smp_ops(emev2_smp_ops),
> .init_early = emev2_init_delay,
> .nr_irqs = NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
> - .init_irq = irqchip_init,
> .init_machine = emev2_add_standard_devices_dt,
> .dt_compat = emev2_boards_compat_dt,
> MACHINE_END
Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 08/20] ARM: shmobile: emev2: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-15 0:59 ` Simon Horman
@ 2013-05-15 1:47 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-05-15 1:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:59:38AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:41PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> > specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> > the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> > declaration for shmobile as well.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
> > index 899a86c..66694e0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-emev2.c
> > @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
> > #include <linux/init.h>
> > #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> > #include <linux/irq.h>
> > -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > #include <linux/platform_data/gpio-em.h>
> > #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> > @@ -454,7 +453,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(EMEV2_DT, "Generic Emma Mobile EV2 (Flattened Device Tree)")
> > .smp = smp_ops(emev2_smp_ops),
> > .init_early = emev2_init_delay,
> > .nr_irqs = NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
> > - .init_irq = irqchip_init,
> > .init_machine = emev2_add_standard_devices_dt,
> > .dt_compat = emev2_boards_compat_dt,
> > MACHINE_END
>
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Sorry, what I should have said is:
Queued up for v3.11 in the soc-emev2 branch of my renesas tree
on kernel.org. It is included in the renesas-next-20130515 tag of
that tree and should appear in linux-next in the not to distant future.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 09/20] ARM: shmobile: r8a73a4: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 08/20] ARM: shmobile: emev2: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-15 1:47 ` Simon Horman
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 10/20] ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: " Maxime Ripard
` (11 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for shmobile as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c
index c5a75a7..0b78896 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
* Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
*/
#include <linux/irq.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/platform_data/irq-renesas-irqc.h>
@@ -194,7 +193,6 @@ static const char *r8a73a4_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
};
DT_MACHINE_START(R8A73A4_DT, "Generic R8A73A4 (Flattened Device Tree)")
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_machine = r8a73a4_add_standard_devices_dt,
.init_time = shmobile_timer_init,
.dt_compat = r8a73a4_boards_compat_dt,
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 09/20] ARM: shmobile: r8a73a4: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 09/20] ARM: shmobile: r8a73a4: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-15 1:47 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-05-15 1:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:42PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for shmobile as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c
> index c5a75a7..0b78896 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a73a4.c
> @@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
> * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
> */
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> #include <linux/platform_data/irq-renesas-irqc.h>
> @@ -194,7 +193,6 @@ static const char *r8a73a4_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
> };
>
> DT_MACHINE_START(R8A73A4_DT, "Generic R8A73A4 (Flattened Device Tree)")
> - .init_irq = irqchip_init,
> .init_machine = r8a73a4_add_standard_devices_dt,
> .init_time = shmobile_timer_init,
> .dt_compat = r8a73a4_boards_compat_dt,
Queued up for v3.11 in the boards-r8a73a4 branch of my renesas tree
on kernel.org. It is included in the renesas-next-20130515 tag of
that tree and should appear in linux-next in the not to distant future.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 10/20] ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 09/20] ARM: shmobile: r8a73a4: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-15 1:48 ` Simon Horman
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 11/20] ARM: shmobile: sh73a0: " Maxime Ripard
` (10 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for shmobile as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c
index 49de2d5..2a7a276 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
*/
#include <linux/irq.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/serial_sci.h>
@@ -142,7 +141,6 @@ static const char *r8a7790_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
};
DT_MACHINE_START(R8A7790_DT, "Generic R8A7790 (Flattened Device Tree)")
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_machine = r8a7790_add_standard_devices_dt,
.init_time = r8a7790_timer_init,
.dt_compat = r8a7790_boards_compat_dt,
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 10/20] ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 10/20] ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-15 1:48 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-05-15 1:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:43PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for shmobile as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c
> index 49de2d5..2a7a276 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-r8a7790.c
> @@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
> */
>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> #include <linux/serial_sci.h>
> @@ -142,7 +141,6 @@ static const char *r8a7790_boards_compat_dt[] __initdata = {
> };
>
> DT_MACHINE_START(R8A7790_DT, "Generic R8A7790 (Flattened Device Tree)")
> - .init_irq = irqchip_init,
> .init_machine = r8a7790_add_standard_devices_dt,
> .init_time = r8a7790_timer_init,
> .dt_compat = r8a7790_boards_compat_dt,
Queued up for v3.11 in the soc-r8a7790 branch of my renesas tree
on kernel.org. It is included in the renesas-next-20130515 tag of
that tree and should appear in linux-next in the not to distant future.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 11/20] ARM: shmobile: sh73a0: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 10/20] ARM: shmobile: r8a7790: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-15 1:48 ` Simon Horman
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 12/20] ARM: bcm281xx: " Maxime Ripard
` (9 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for shmobile as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c
index fdf3894..73dd75b 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/interrupt.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
@@ -1035,7 +1034,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(SH73A0_DT, "Generic SH73A0 (Flattened Device Tree)")
.map_io = sh73a0_map_io,
.init_early = sh73a0_init_delay,
.nr_irqs = NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_machine = sh73a0_add_standard_devices_dt,
.dt_compat = sh73a0_boards_compat_dt,
MACHINE_END
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 11/20] ARM: shmobile: sh73a0: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 11/20] ARM: shmobile: sh73a0: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-15 1:48 ` Simon Horman
0 siblings, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Simon Horman @ 2013-05-15 1:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:44PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for shmobile as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c
> index fdf3894..73dd75b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/setup-sh73a0.c
> @@ -22,7 +22,6 @@
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/irq.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> #include <linux/of_platform.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> @@ -1035,7 +1034,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(SH73A0_DT, "Generic SH73A0 (Flattened Device Tree)")
> .map_io = sh73a0_map_io,
> .init_early = sh73a0_init_delay,
> .nr_irqs = NR_IRQS_LEGACY,
> - .init_irq = irqchip_init,
> .init_machine = sh73a0_add_standard_devices_dt,
> .dt_compat = sh73a0_boards_compat_dt,
> MACHINE_END
Queued up for v3.11 in the soc-sh73a0 branch of my renesas tree
on kernel.org. It is included in the renesas-next-20130515 tag of
that tree and should appear in linux-next in the not to distant future.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 12/20] ARM: bcm281xx: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 11/20] ARM: shmobile: sh73a0: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 18:04 ` Christian Daudt
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 13/20] ARM: spear: " Maxime Ripard
` (8 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for bcm281xx as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Christian Daudt <csd@broadcom.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c
index 22e8421..2859932 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/device.h>
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/clocksource.h>
#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
@@ -54,7 +53,6 @@ static void __init board_init(void)
static const char * const bcm11351_dt_compat[] = { "bcm,bcm11351", NULL, };
DT_MACHINE_START(BCM11351_DT, "Broadcom Application Processor")
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = clocksource_of_init,
.init_machine = board_init,
.dt_compat = bcm11351_dt_compat,
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 12/20] ARM: bcm281xx: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 12/20] ARM: bcm281xx: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 18:04 ` Christian Daudt
0 siblings, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Christian Daudt @ 2013-05-14 18:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 13-05-14 08:38 AM, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for bcm281xx as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> Acked-by: Christian Daudt <csd@broadcom.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c
> index 22e8421..2859932 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-bcm/board_bcm.c
> @@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
> #include <linux/init.h>
> #include <linux/device.h>
> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> #include <linux/clocksource.h>
>
> #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
> @@ -54,7 +53,6 @@ static void __init board_init(void)
> static const char * const bcm11351_dt_compat[] = { "bcm,bcm11351", NULL, };
>
> DT_MACHINE_START(BCM11351_DT, "Broadcom Application Processor")
> - .init_irq = irqchip_init,
> .init_time = clocksource_of_init,
> .init_machine = board_init,
> .dt_compat = bcm11351_dt_compat,
Applied.
Thanks,
csd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 13/20] ARM: spear: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 12/20] ARM: bcm281xx: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 14/20] ARM: msm: " Maxime Ripard
` (7 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for spear as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
---
arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1310.c | 2 --
arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1340.c | 2 --
arch/arm/mach-spear/spear300.c | 2 --
arch/arm/mach-spear/spear310.c | 2 --
arch/arm/mach-spear/spear320.c | 2 --
arch/arm/mach-spear/spear6xx.c | 2 --
6 files changed, 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1310.c b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1310.c
index 9eaac2c..7ad0030 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1310.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1310.c
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "SPEAr1310: " fmt
#include <linux/amba/pl022.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/pata_arasan_cf_data.h>
#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
@@ -60,7 +59,6 @@ static void __init spear1310_map_io(void)
DT_MACHINE_START(SPEAR1310_DT, "ST SPEAr1310 SoC with Flattened Device Tree")
.smp = smp_ops(spear13xx_smp_ops),
.map_io = spear1310_map_io,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = spear13xx_timer_init,
.init_machine = spear1310_dt_init,
.restart = spear_restart,
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1340.c b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1340.c
index a04a7fe..3fb6834 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1340.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear1340.c
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
#include <linux/amba/serial.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
#include "generic.h"
#include <mach/spear.h>
@@ -155,7 +154,6 @@ static const char * const spear1340_dt_board_compat[] = {
DT_MACHINE_START(SPEAR1340_DT, "ST SPEAr1340 SoC with Flattened Device Tree")
.smp = smp_ops(spear13xx_smp_ops),
.map_io = spear13xx_map_io,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = spear13xx_timer_init,
.init_machine = spear1340_dt_init,
.restart = spear_restart,
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear300.c b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear300.c
index bac56e8..b52e48f 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear300.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear300.c
@@ -14,7 +14,6 @@
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "SPEAr300: " fmt
#include <linux/amba/pl08x.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
#include "generic.h"
@@ -212,7 +211,6 @@ static void __init spear300_map_io(void)
DT_MACHINE_START(SPEAR300_DT, "ST SPEAr300 SoC with Flattened Device Tree")
.map_io = spear300_map_io,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = spear3xx_timer_init,
.init_machine = spear300_dt_init,
.restart = spear_restart,
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear310.c b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear310.c
index 6ffbc63..ed2029d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear310.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear310.c
@@ -15,7 +15,6 @@
#include <linux/amba/pl08x.h>
#include <linux/amba/serial.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
#include "generic.h"
@@ -254,7 +253,6 @@ static void __init spear310_map_io(void)
DT_MACHINE_START(SPEAR310_DT, "ST SPEAr310 SoC with Flattened Device Tree")
.map_io = spear310_map_io,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = spear3xx_timer_init,
.init_machine = spear310_dt_init,
.restart = spear_restart,
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear320.c b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear320.c
index 6eb3eec..bf634b3 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear320.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear320.c
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
#include <linux/amba/pl022.h>
#include <linux/amba/pl08x.h>
#include <linux/amba/serial.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
#include <asm/mach/map.h>
@@ -269,7 +268,6 @@ static void __init spear320_map_io(void)
DT_MACHINE_START(SPEAR320_DT, "ST SPEAr320 SoC with Flattened Device Tree")
.map_io = spear320_map_io,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = spear3xx_timer_init,
.init_machine = spear320_dt_init,
.restart = spear_restart,
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear6xx.c b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear6xx.c
index ec8eefb..8b0295a 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear6xx.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-spear/spear6xx.c
@@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
#include <linux/amba/pl08x.h>
#include <linux/clk.h>
#include <linux/err.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
@@ -423,7 +422,6 @@ static const char *spear600_dt_board_compat[] = {
DT_MACHINE_START(SPEAR600_DT, "ST SPEAr600 (Flattened Device Tree)")
.map_io = spear6xx_map_io,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = spear6xx_timer_init,
.init_machine = spear600_dt_init,
.restart = spear_restart,
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 14/20] ARM: msm: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 13/20] ARM: spear: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-15 17:12 ` David Brown
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 15/20] ARM: mvebu: " Maxime Ripard
` (6 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for msm as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8660.c | 2 --
arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8960.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8660.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8660.c
index 7dcfc53..492f5cd 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8660.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8660.c
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
*/
#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/of.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
@@ -44,7 +43,6 @@ static const char *msm8x60_fluid_match[] __initdata = {
DT_MACHINE_START(MSM_DT, "Qualcomm MSM (Flattened Device Tree)")
.smp = smp_ops(msm_smp_ops),
.map_io = msm_map_msm8x60_io,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_machine = msm8x60_dt_init,
.init_late = msm8x60_init_late,
.init_time = msm_dt_timer_init,
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8960.c b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8960.c
index 7301936..bb55309 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8960.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8960.c
@@ -11,7 +11,6 @@
*/
#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
@@ -31,7 +30,6 @@ static const char * const msm8960_dt_match[] __initconst = {
DT_MACHINE_START(MSM8960_DT, "Qualcomm MSM (Flattened Device Tree)")
.smp = smp_ops(msm_smp_ops),
.map_io = msm_map_msm8960_io,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = msm_dt_timer_init,
.init_machine = msm_dt_init,
.dt_compat = msm8960_dt_match,
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 14/20] ARM: msm: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 14/20] ARM: msm: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-15 17:12 ` David Brown
0 siblings, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: David Brown @ 2013-05-15 17:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:47PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for msm as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8660.c | 2 --
> arch/arm/mach-msm/board-dt-8960.c | 2 --
> 2 files changed, 4 deletions(-)
I've replaced the patch in my msm-cleanup tree with this one. I'll
push this out once the support goes into the arm soc tree.
David
--
sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 15/20] ARM: mvebu: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 14/20] ARM: msm: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-19 20:17 ` Jason Cooper
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 16/20] ARM: mxs: " Maxime Ripard
` (5 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for mvebu as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
---
arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c
index 42a4cb3..c04fed8 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
#include <linux/clk/mvebu.h>
#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
#include <linux/mbus.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <asm/hardware/cache-l2x0.h>
#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
#include <asm/mach/map.h>
@@ -96,7 +95,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(ARMADA_XP_DT, "Marvell Armada 370/XP (Device Tree)")
.init_machine = armada_370_xp_dt_init,
.map_io = armada_370_xp_map_io,
.init_early = armada_370_xp_init_early,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = armada_370_xp_timer_and_clk_init,
.restart = mvebu_restart,
.dt_compat = armada_370_xp_dt_compat,
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 15/20] ARM: mvebu: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 15/20] ARM: mvebu: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-19 20:17 ` Jason Cooper
0 siblings, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Jason Cooper @ 2013-05-19 20:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:48PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for mvebu as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> Acked-by: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-mvebu/armada-370-xp.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
Applied to mvebu/cleanup
thx,
Jason.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 16/20] ARM: mxs: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 15/20] ARM: mvebu: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-17 1:53 ` Shawn Guo
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 17/20] ARM: sirf: " Maxime Ripard
` (4 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for mxs as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c
index 5b62b64..66fe810 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-mxs/mach-mxs.c
@@ -19,7 +19,6 @@
#include <linux/err.h>
#include <linux/gpio.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/irqchip/mxs.h>
#include <linux/micrel_phy.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
@@ -435,7 +434,6 @@ static const char *mxs_dt_compat[] __initdata = {
DT_MACHINE_START(MXS, "Freescale MXS (Device Tree)")
.map_io = debug_ll_io_init,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.handle_irq = icoll_handle_irq,
.init_time = mxs_timer_init,
.init_machine = mxs_machine_init,
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 16/20] ARM: mxs: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 16/20] ARM: mxs: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-17 1:53 ` Shawn Guo
0 siblings, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Shawn Guo @ 2013-05-17 1:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 05:38:49PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for mxs as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Applied, thanks.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread
* [PATCH 17/20] ARM: sirf: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 16/20] ARM: mxs: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 18/20] ARM: vexpress: " Maxime Ripard
` (3 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for sirf as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Barry Song <Baohua.Song@csr.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-prima2/common.c | 4 ----
1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-prima2/common.c b/arch/arm/mach-prima2/common.c
index 4f94cd8..a9f475c 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-prima2/common.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-prima2/common.c
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
#include <linux/clocksource.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/kernel.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <asm/sizes.h>
#include <asm/mach-types.h>
#include <asm/mach/arch.h>
@@ -55,7 +54,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(ATLAS6_DT, "Generic ATLAS6 (Flattened Device Tree)")
/* Maintainer: Barry Song <baohua.song@csr.com> */
.nr_irqs = 128,
.map_io = sirfsoc_map_io,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = sirfsoc_init_time,
.init_machine = sirfsoc_mach_init,
.init_late = sirfsoc_init_late,
@@ -74,7 +72,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(PRIMA2_DT, "Generic PRIMA2 (Flattened Device Tree)")
/* Maintainer: Barry Song <baohua.song@csr.com> */
.nr_irqs = 128,
.map_io = sirfsoc_map_io,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = sirfsoc_init_time,
.dma_zone_size = SZ_256M,
.init_machine = sirfsoc_mach_init,
@@ -94,7 +91,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(MARCO_DT, "Generic MARCO (Flattened Device Tree)")
/* Maintainer: Barry Song <baohua.song@csr.com> */
.smp = smp_ops(sirfsoc_smp_ops),
.map_io = sirfsoc_map_io,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = sirfsoc_init_time,
.init_machine = sirfsoc_mach_init,
.init_late = sirfsoc_init_late,
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 18/20] ARM: vexpress: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 17/20] ARM: sirf: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 19/20] ARM: virt: " Maxime Ripard
` (2 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for vexpress as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Acked-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c
index 8802030..d601697 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-vexpress/v2m.c
@@ -9,7 +9,6 @@
#include <linux/clocksource.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/of_address.h>
#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
#include <linux/of_irq.h>
@@ -458,7 +457,6 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(VEXPRESS_DT, "ARM-Versatile Express")
.smp = smp_ops(vexpress_smp_ops),
.map_io = v2m_dt_map_io,
.init_early = v2m_dt_init_early,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_time = v2m_dt_timer_init,
.init_machine = v2m_dt_init,
MACHINE_END
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 19/20] ARM: virt: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 18/20] ARM: vexpress: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 20/20] ARM: vt8500: " Maxime Ripard
2013-05-15 12:55 ` [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Arnd Bergmann
20 siblings, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for virt as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-virt/virt.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-virt/virt.c b/arch/arm/mach-virt/virt.c
index 061f283..bdf05f4 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-virt/virt.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-virt/virt.c
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@
* along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/of_irq.h>
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
@@ -39,7 +38,6 @@ static const char *virt_dt_match[] = {
extern struct smp_operations virt_smp_ops;
DT_MACHINE_START(VIRT, "Dummy Virtual Machine")
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_machine = virt_init,
.smp = smp_ops(virt_smp_ops),
.dt_compat = virt_dt_match,
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 20/20] ARM: vt8500: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 19/20] ARM: virt: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-14 15:38 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-05-15 18:52 ` Tony Prisk
2013-05-15 12:55 ` [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Arnd Bergmann
20 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-14 15:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
declaration for vt8500 as well.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
index 1dd281e..70a5ac9 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
@@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
#include <linux/clocksource.h>
#include <linux/io.h>
-#include <linux/irqchip.h>
#include <linux/pm.h>
#include <asm/mach-types.h>
@@ -178,7 +177,6 @@ static const char * const vt8500_dt_compat[] = {
DT_MACHINE_START(WMT_DT, "VIA/Wondermedia SoC (Device Tree Support)")
.dt_compat = vt8500_dt_compat,
.map_io = vt8500_map_io,
- .init_irq = irqchip_init,
.init_machine = vt8500_init,
.init_time = clocksource_of_init,
.restart = vt8500_restart,
--
1.8.1.2
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCH 20/20] ARM: vt8500: Remove init_irq declaration in machine description
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 20/20] ARM: vt8500: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-15 18:52 ` Tony Prisk
2013-05-16 8:18 ` Maxime Ripard
0 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Tony Prisk @ 2013-05-15 18:52 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On 15/05/13 03:38, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Commit ebafed7a ("ARM: irq: Call irqchip_init if no init_irq function is
> specified") removed the need to explictly setup the init_irq field in
> the machine description when using only irqchip_init. Remove that
> declaration for vt8500 as well.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
> index 1dd281e..70a5ac9 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-vt8500/vt8500.c
> @@ -20,7 +20,6 @@
>
> #include <linux/clocksource.h>
> #include <linux/io.h>
> -#include <linux/irqchip.h>
> #include <linux/pm.h>
>
> #include <asm/mach-types.h>
> @@ -178,7 +177,6 @@ static const char * const vt8500_dt_compat[] = {
> DT_MACHINE_START(WMT_DT, "VIA/Wondermedia SoC (Device Tree Support)")
> .dt_compat = vt8500_dt_compat,
> .map_io = vt8500_map_io,
> - .init_irq = irqchip_init,
> .init_machine = vt8500_init,
> .init_time = clocksource_of_init,
> .restart = vt8500_restart,
I don't have any plans to touch this driver, so please send direct to
arm-soc as Arnd
requested.
Acked-by: Tony Prisk <linux@prisktech.co.nz>
Regards
Tony Prisk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread
* [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls
2013-05-14 15:38 [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Maxime Ripard
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2013-05-14 15:38 ` [PATCH 20/20] ARM: vt8500: " Maxime Ripard
@ 2013-05-15 12:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-16 8:18 ` Maxime Ripard
20 siblings, 1 reply; 45+ messages in thread
From: Arnd Bergmann @ 2013-05-15 12:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
On Tuesday 14 May 2013, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> This is a splitted up version of the patch I previously sent to
> remove the explicit declaration of irqchip_init as the init_irq callback in
> the machine descriptions.
>
> Since it was a pretty tricky patch to merge, since it was touching a lot of
> different platforms, I splitted it for each platforms, and rebased it on top
> of 3.10-rc1.
>
> The best way to merge it is probably that each one of us take into their tree
> the patches that are relevant for our architecture and send them to arm-soc
> later on.
Sounds good to me. I'm sure that some platform maintainers will fail to
apply this though. Could you send whatever remains as a separate branch
in a couple of weeks so we can directly apply it to next/cleanup?
Arnd
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread* [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls
2013-05-15 12:55 ` [PATCHv2 00/20] Cleanup irqchip_init calls Arnd Bergmann
@ 2013-05-16 8:18 ` Maxime Ripard
0 siblings, 0 replies; 45+ messages in thread
From: Maxime Ripard @ 2013-05-16 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hi Arnd,
Le 15/05/2013 14:55, Arnd Bergmann a ?crit :
> On Tuesday 14 May 2013, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>> This is a splitted up version of the patch I previously sent to
>> remove the explicit declaration of irqchip_init as the init_irq callback in
>> the machine descriptions.
>>
>> Since it was a pretty tricky patch to merge, since it was touching a lot of
>> different platforms, I splitted it for each platforms, and rebased it on top
>> of 3.10-rc1.
>>
>> The best way to merge it is probably that each one of us take into their tree
>> the patches that are relevant for our architecture and send them to arm-soc
>> later on.
>
> Sounds good to me. I'm sure that some platform maintainers will fail to
> apply this though. Could you send whatever remains as a separate branch
> in a couple of weeks so we can directly apply it to next/cleanup?
Ok, I will.
Thanks,
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 45+ messages in thread