From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: morten.rasmussen@arm.com (Morten Rasmussen) Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 16:56:58 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 11/14] sched: filter task pull request In-Reply-To: References: <1366910611-20048-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> <1366910611-20048-12-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20130522155658.GB4935@e103034-lin> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 11:00:58AM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote: > Part of this patch is missing, the fix below is needed > > @@ -3497,7 +3497,9 @@ static bool is_buddy_full(int cpu) > static bool is_my_buddy(int cpu, int buddy) > { > int my_buddy = per_cpu(sd_pack_buddy, cpu); > - return (my_buddy == -1) || (buddy == my_buddy); > + > + return ((sysctl_sched_packing_mode == SCHED_PACKING_FULL) && > + ((my_buddy == -1) || (buddy == my_buddy))); > } > > static bool is_light_task(struct task_struct *p) > > > On 25 April 2013 19:23, Vincent Guittot wrote: > > Only CPUs that participates to the packing effort can pull tasks on a busiest > > group. > > > > Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot > > --- > > kernel/sched/fair.c | 14 ++++++++++++-- > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c > > index 28f8ea7..6f63fb9 100644 > > --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c > > +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c > > @@ -3494,6 +3494,12 @@ static bool is_buddy_full(int cpu) > > return (sum * 1024 >= period * 1000); > > } > > > > +static bool is_my_buddy(int cpu, int buddy) > > +{ > > + int my_buddy = per_cpu(sd_pack_buddy, cpu); > > + return (my_buddy == -1) || (buddy == my_buddy); > > +} Would it make sense to change the function name to something like is_packing_target() and only have one argument? is_my_buddy() is only used with the same variable for both arguments like below. > > + > > static bool is_light_task(struct task_struct *p) > > { > > /* A light task runs less than 20% in average */ > > @@ -4688,8 +4694,8 @@ static inline void update_sg_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env, > > > > /* Bias balancing toward cpus of our domain */ > > if (local_group) { > > - if (idle_cpu(i) && !first_idle_cpu && > > - cpumask_test_cpu(i, sched_group_mask(group))) { > > + if (is_my_buddy(i, i) && idle_cpu(i) && !first_idle_cpu > > + && cpumask_test_cpu(i, sched_group_mask(group))) { > > first_idle_cpu = 1; > > balance_cpu = i; > > } > > @@ -4817,6 +4823,10 @@ static void update_plb_buddy(int cpu, int *balance, struct sd_lb_stats *sds, > > > > /* Get my new buddy */ > > buddy = per_cpu(sd_pack_buddy, cpu); > > + > > + /* This CPU doesn't act for agressive packing */ > > + if (buddy != cpu) > > + sds->busiest = 0; sds->busiest is a pointer, so I think it should be assigned to NULL instead of 0. Morten > > } > > > > /** > > -- > > 1.7.9.5 > > >