From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones)
Date: Thu, 23 May 2013 08:09:05 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: ab8500-ext: Don't register without
 initialisation data
In-Reply-To: <20130522174516.GT1627@sirena.org.uk>
References: <1369226853-16978-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
 <1369226853-16978-3-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org>
 <20130522155347.GJ1627@sirena.org.uk>
 <20130522165353.GB18714@gmail.com>
 <20130522174516.GT1627@sirena.org.uk>
Message-ID: <20130523070905.GD18714@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, 22 May 2013, Mark Brown wrote:

> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 05:53:53PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 22 May 2013, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > running or not, the worst that should happen is that the state can be
> > > read back.  I'd therefore expect the fix here to be in the board side
> > > code that enables the regulators.
> 
> > It's both.
> 
> > From the platform side we have stopped passing the external regulator
> > driver's constraints for Snowball:
> 
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/22/280
> 
> > All I've done here is stop the ext driver from crapping out with the
> > misleading error "Configuration error: size mismatch", because a)
> > it's not an error, it's expected and b) It's not a size mismatch,
> > instead we have chosen to keep the constraints back in the Snowball
> > (and u8505) case.
> 
> OK, so the regulator driver is buggy and insisting on having constraints
> passed in for every regulator then?

If that's not how it's meant to work then, yes.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog