From: s.hauer@pengutronix.de (Sascha Hauer)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: clock framework: Don't disable a clock already enabled by boot loader?
Date: Sat, 25 May 2013 01:00:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130524230021.GF31135@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <519F60CA.6090302@de.bosch.com>
Hi Dirk,
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 02:44:58PM +0200, Dirk Behme wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we register a clock using clk_register_clkdev() etc already enabled
> by a boot loader. We are doing only the clk_register_clkdev(), but
> no clock_enable() etc on this clock.
>
> With this, enable_count for this clock is zero, while in fact it's
> already on. I.e. the kernel doesn't know that it is on.
>
> This results in
>
> late_initcall(clk_disable_unused())
>
> disabling this clock because the kernel thinks it's unused.
>
> Is this the intended behavior?
Yes, and it's great since after this point the hardware state is in sync
with the enable counter.
> Is there a way to let the kernel know
> "the clock is enabled already, set enable_count != 0"? Or is the
> only way to do this correctly calling clock_enable() on an already
> enabled clock?
You could set the CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED flag in the clock, but I suggest to
just clk_get/clk_enable the clock in the driver using it.
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-05-24 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-24 12:44 clock framework: Don't disable a clock already enabled by boot loader? Dirk Behme
2013-05-24 23:00 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2013-05-25 5:59 ` Dirk Behme
2013-05-25 6:54 ` Shawn Guo
2013-05-25 7:16 ` Dirk Behme
2013-05-25 11:17 ` Shawn Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130524230021.GF31135@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).