From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Tue, 28 May 2013 17:48:03 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 20/39] usb: musb: ux500: move channel number knowledge into the driver In-Reply-To: <20130528162715.GB28253@arwen.pp.htv.fi> References: <1368611522-9984-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <1368611522-9984-21-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <20130528162715.GB28253@arwen.pp.htv.fi> Message-ID: <20130528164803.GA3012@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Felipe > > > For all ux500 based platforms the maximum number of end-points are used. > > > Move this knowledge into the driver so we can relinquish the burden from > > > platform data. This also removes quite a bit of complexity from the driver > > > and will aid us when we come to enable the driver for Device Tree. > > > > > > Cc: Felipe Balbi > > > Cc: linux-usb at vger.kernel.org > > > Acked-by: Linus Walleij > > > Acked-by: Fabio Baltieri > > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > > > > I guess this stuff is dependent on the stuff Fabio has recently sent to > > Felipe for the ux500 musb DMA so these musb patches should > > primarily go through his tree. > > > > It seems like the later changes to the platform code > > (arch/arm/mach-ux500) may be sufficiently orthogonal > > so it can be done out-of-order? > > > > I can't merge any of this without Felipes ACKs in any > > case. > > Do you want to take this yourself ? I haven't fully read the series yet, > but seems like this depends on the rest of the series. If you want to > take it, let me know I can ack the patches as soon as I'm done > reviewing. Yes that would be ideal, if you wouldn't mind. Kind regards, Lee -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog