From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette) Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 16:05:16 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ARM : omap3 : fix wrong container_of in clock36xx.c In-Reply-To: <1368805886-26085-1-git-send-email-jp.francois@cynove.com> References: <1368805886-26085-1-git-send-email-jp.francois@cynove.com> Message-ID: <20130529230516.6058.74417@quantum> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Quoting Jean-Philippe Francois (2013-05-17 08:51:26) > omap36xx_pwrdn_clk_enable_with_hsdiv_restore expects the parent hw of the clock > to be a clk_hw_omap. However, looking at cclock3xxx_data.c, all concerned clock > have parent defined as clk_divider. > Fix the function to use clk_divider. > Tested with 3.9 on dm3730. > > Signed-off-by: Jean-Philippe Fran??ois > > Index: b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock36xx.c > =================================================================== > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock36xx.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock36xx.c > @@ -20,11 +20,12 @@ > > #include > #include > +#include > #include > > #include "clock.h" > #include "clock36xx.h" > - > +#define to_clk_divider(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct clk_divider, hw) > > /** > * omap36xx_pwrdn_clk_enable_with_hsdiv_restore - enable clocks suffering > @@ -39,29 +40,28 @@ > */ > int omap36xx_pwrdn_clk_enable_with_hsdiv_restore(struct clk_hw *clk) > { > - struct clk_hw_omap *parent; > + struct clk_divider *parent; > struct clk_hw *parent_hw; > - u32 dummy_v, orig_v, clksel_shift; > + u32 dummy_v, orig_v; > int ret; > > /* Clear PWRDN bit of HSDIVIDER */ > ret = omap2_dflt_clk_enable(clk); > > parent_hw = __clk_get_hw(__clk_get_parent(clk->clk)); > - parent = to_clk_hw_omap(parent_hw); > + parent = to_clk_divider(parent_hw); Peaking inside of clock structures was OK back in the legacy clock days, and even if the clocks are the same type (clk_hw_omap), but having omap code dig into clk-divider structures is pretty gross. How about reentrantly calling clk_set_rate here to achieve the same effect? /* kick parent's clksel register after toggling PWRDN bit */ struct clk *parent = clk_get_parent(clk->clk); unsigned long parent_rate = clk_get_rate(parent); clk_set_rate(parent, parent_rate/2); clk_set_rate(parent, parent_rate); Regards, Mike > > /* Restore the dividers */ > if (!ret) { > - clksel_shift = __ffs(parent->clksel_mask); > - orig_v = __raw_readl(parent->clksel_reg); > + orig_v = __raw_readl(parent->reg); > dummy_v = orig_v; > > /* Write any other value different from the Read value */ > - dummy_v ^= (1 << clksel_shift); > - __raw_writel(dummy_v, parent->clksel_reg); > + dummy_v ^= (1 << parent->shift); > + __raw_writel(dummy_v, parent->reg); > > /* Write the original divider */ > - __raw_writel(orig_v, parent->clksel_reg); > + __raw_writel(orig_v, parent->reg); > } > > return ret;