[PATCH 1/8] video: atmel_lcdfb: fix platform data struct

[plagnioj@jcrosoft.com (Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD)]

On 08:39 Thu 30 May     , Richard Genoud wrote:
> 2013/5/29 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>:
> > On 19:44 Wed 29 May     , Richard Genoud wrote:
> >> 2013/5/29 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>:
> >> > On 16:36 Wed 29 May     , Richard Genoud wrote:
> >> >> 2013/4/11 Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>:
> >> >> > Today we mix pdata and drivers data in the struct atmel_lcdfb_info
> >> >> > Fix it and introduce a new struct atmel_lcdfb_pdata for platform data only
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
> >> >> > Cc: linux-fbdev at vger.kernel.org
> >> >> > Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> >> >> > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> >> >> > Cc: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
> >> >> > ---
> >> >> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261_devices.c    |    6 +-
> >> >> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263_devices.c    |    6 +-
> >> >> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45_devices.c    |    6 +-
> >> >> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9rl_devices.c     |    6 +-
> >> >> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9261ek.c        |    6 +-
> >> >> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9263ek.c        |    4 +-
> >> >> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9m10g45ek.c     |    4 +-
> >> >> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/board-sam9rlek.c         |    4 +-
> >> >> >  arch/arm/mach-at91/board.h                  |    4 +-
> >> >> >  arch/avr32/boards/atngw100/evklcd10x.c      |    6 +-
> >> >> >  arch/avr32/boards/atngw100/mrmt.c           |    4 +-
> >> >> >  arch/avr32/boards/atstk1000/atstk1000.h     |    2 +-
> >> >> >  arch/avr32/boards/atstk1000/setup.c         |    2 +-
> >> >> >  arch/avr32/boards/favr-32/setup.c           |    2 +-
> >> >> >  arch/avr32/boards/hammerhead/setup.c        |    2 +-
> >> >> >  arch/avr32/boards/merisc/display.c          |    2 +-
> >> >> >  arch/avr32/boards/mimc200/setup.c           |    4 +-
> >> >> >  arch/avr32/mach-at32ap/at32ap700x.c         |    8 +--
> >> >> >  arch/avr32/mach-at32ap/include/mach/board.h |    4 +-
> >> >> >  drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c                 |  104 +++++++++++++++++----------
> >> >> >  include/video/atmel_lcdc.h                  |   24 +------
> >> >> >  21 files changed, 109 insertions(+), 101 deletions(-)
> >> >> >
> >> >> [snip]
> >> >> > diff --git a/drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c b/drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c
> >> >> > index c1a2914..98733cd4 100644
> >> >> > --- a/drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c
> >> >> > +++ b/drivers/video/atmel_lcdfb.c
> >> >> > @@ -20,12 +20,45 @@
> >> >> >  #include <linux/gfp.h>
> >> >> >  #include <linux/module.h>
> >> >> >  #include <linux/platform_data/atmel.h>
> >> >> > +#include <video/of_display_timing.h>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >  #include <mach/cpu.h>
> >> >> >  #include <asm/gpio.h>
> >> >> >
> >> >> >  #include <video/atmel_lcdc.h>
> >> >> >
> >> >> > +struct atmel_lcdfb_config {
> >> >> > +       bool have_alt_pixclock;
> >> >> > +       bool have_hozval;
> >> >> > +       bool have_intensity_bit;
> >> >> > +};
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > + /* LCD Controller info data structure, stored in device platform_data */
> >> >> > +struct atmel_lcdfb_info {
> >> >> > +       spinlock_t              lock;
> >> >> > +       struct fb_info          *info;
> >> >> > +       void __iomem            *mmio;
> >> >> > +       int                     irq_base;
> >> >> > +       struct work_struct      task;
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +       unsigned int            smem_len;
> >> >> > +       struct platform_device  *pdev;
> >> >> > +       struct clk              *bus_clk;
> >> >> > +       struct clk              *lcdc_clk;
> >> >> > +
> >> >> > +       struct backlight_device *backlight;
> >> >> > +       u8                      bl_power;
> >> >> > +       bool                    lcdcon_pol_negative;
> >> >> I think lcdcon_pol_negative should be part of pdata, because it really
> >> >> depends on how the PWM is wired on the board.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > maybe but no one mainline use it on any pdata for non-dt boars
> >> > so I did not want to expose it
> >> Well, at least, I'm using it :)
> >> (and I guess that Andreas is using it also, otherwise he wouldn't have
> >> introduce it !)
> >
> > yes but pdata is for non-dt boards, for dt you can keep it in struct
> > atmel_lcdfb_info and add a property
> >
> > if non-dt boards want it my answer is I do not care switch to DT
> 
> ok (I use a full DT board based on sam9g35)
> 
> so I'll add something like
> sinfo->lcdcon_pol_negative = of_property_read_bool(display_np,
> "atmel,lcdcon-pwm-pulse-low");
> in /atmel_lcdfb.c
> 
> But I thought the goal of this patch was to separate driver data from
> platform specific data, and IMHO, lcdcon_pol_negative is a specificity
> of the platform.

You are right but as non one mainline use it as pdata I choose to drop it
and only keep it on the driver as we can still use it for DT

It's a way to force peopoe to switch to DT

Best Regards,
J.
> 
> Best regards,
> Richard.