From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: catalin.marinas@arm.com (Catalin Marinas)
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 17:56:21 +0100
Subject: Single zImage and A15/LPAE
In-Reply-To: <201305292351.41096.arnd@arndb.de>
References: <50735B75.8070109@wwwdotorg.org> <2274563.opVbLLPT1p@wuerfel>
 <20130529151555.GP17767@MacBook-Pro.local>
 <201305292351.41096.arnd@arndb.de>
Message-ID: <20130530165621.GL23631@arm.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 10:51:40PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 29 May 2013, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > I think to do this right, we need to treat ARMv7+LPAE as a separate
> > > architecture level, just like we treat ARMv6, ARMv7 as separate
> > > compatible architectures. BTW, is there an official name for that
> > > architecture?
> > 
> > The official is Large Physical Address Extension which is an extension
> > to ARMv7, so not a new architecture.
> 
> Ah, too bad. I had hoped there were still postfixes like v6K or v4T.
> I guess there is no complete list of ARMv7 extensions anywhere, right?

It's the ARM ARM, though not a list. With ARMv7 we moved away from
adding suffixes to the architecture number and introduced the CPUID
scheme to check for what's available on a CPU.

-- 
Catalin