* [PATCH v2] clk: implement clk_unregister
@ 2013-06-03 8:24 Jiada Wang
2013-06-03 8:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-06-11 20:13 ` Mike Turquette
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jiada Wang @ 2013-06-03 8:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Currently clk_unregister is unimplemented, it is required in case
sub modules want actually remove clk device registered by clk_register.
This patch adds the implementation of clk_unregiser.
Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>
---
drivers/clk/clk.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
index 934cfd1..0b9e13c 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
@@ -342,6 +342,25 @@ out:
return ret;
}
+ /**
+ * clk_debug_unregister - remove a clk node from the debugfs clk tree
+ * @clk: the clk being removed from the debugfs clk tree
+ *
+ * Dynamically removes a clk and all it's children clk nodes from the
+ * debugfs clk tree if clk->dentry points to debugfs created by
+ * clk_debug_register in __clk_init.
+ *
+ * Caller must hold prepare_lock.
+ *
+ */
+static void clk_debug_unregister(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ if (!clk || !clk->dentry)
+ return;
+
+ debugfs_remove_recursive(clk->dentry);
+}
+
/**
* clk_debug_reparent - reparent clk node in the debugfs clk tree
* @clk: the clk being reparented
@@ -432,6 +451,9 @@ static inline int clk_debug_register(struct clk *clk) { return 0; }
static inline void clk_debug_reparent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *new_parent)
{
}
+static inline void clk_debug_unregister(struct clk *clk)
+{
+}
#endif
/* caller must hold prepare_lock */
@@ -1790,9 +1812,42 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_register);
* clk_unregister - unregister a currently registered clock
* @clk: clock to unregister
*
- * Currently unimplemented.
*/
-void clk_unregister(struct clk *clk) {}
+void clk_unregister(struct clk *clk)
+{
+ int i;
+
+ if (!clk)
+ return;
+
+ mutex_lock(&prepare_lock);
+ if (clk->prepare_count) {
+ pr_debug("%s: can't unregister clk %s, it is prepared\n",
+ __func__, clk->name);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ if (!hlist_empty(&clk->children)) {
+ pr_debug("%s: clk %s has registered children\n",
+ __func__, clk->name);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ clk_debug_unregister(clk);
+
+ hlist_del_init(&clk->child_node);
+
+ kfree(clk->parents);
+ i = clk->num_parents;
+ while (--i >= 0)
+ kfree(clk->parent_names[i]);
+ kfree(clk->parent_names);
+ kfree(clk->name);
+ kfree(clk);
+out:
+ mutex_unlock(&prepare_lock);
+ return;
+}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_unregister);
static void devm_clk_release(struct device *dev, void *res)
--
1.8.1.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] clk: implement clk_unregister
2013-06-03 8:24 [PATCH v2] clk: implement clk_unregister Jiada Wang
@ 2013-06-03 8:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-06-11 20:13 ` Mike Turquette
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Uwe Kleine-König @ 2013-06-03 8:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:24:15PM +0900, Jiada Wang wrote:
> Currently clk_unregister is unimplemented, it is required in case
> sub modules want actually remove clk device registered by clk_register.
> This patch adds the implementation of clk_unregiser.
s/unregiser/unregister/
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2] clk: implement clk_unregister
2013-06-03 8:24 [PATCH v2] clk: implement clk_unregister Jiada Wang
2013-06-03 8:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König
@ 2013-06-11 20:13 ` Mike Turquette
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mike Turquette @ 2013-06-11 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-arm-kernel
Quoting Jiada Wang (2013-06-03 01:24:15)
> Currently clk_unregister is unimplemented, it is required in case
> sub modules want actually remove clk device registered by clk_register.
> This patch adds the implementation of clk_unregiser.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiada Wang <jiada_wang@mentor.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> index 934cfd1..0b9e13c 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c
> @@ -342,6 +342,25 @@ out:
> return ret;
> }
>
> + /**
> + * clk_debug_unregister - remove a clk node from the debugfs clk tree
> + * @clk: the clk being removed from the debugfs clk tree
> + *
> + * Dynamically removes a clk and all it's children clk nodes from the
> + * debugfs clk tree if clk->dentry points to debugfs created by
> + * clk_debug_register in __clk_init.
> + *
> + * Caller must hold prepare_lock.
> + *
> + */
> +static void clk_debug_unregister(struct clk *clk)
> +{
> + if (!clk || !clk->dentry)
> + return;
> +
> + debugfs_remove_recursive(clk->dentry);
> +}
> +
> /**
> * clk_debug_reparent - reparent clk node in the debugfs clk tree
> * @clk: the clk being reparented
> @@ -432,6 +451,9 @@ static inline int clk_debug_register(struct clk *clk) { return 0; }
> static inline void clk_debug_reparent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *new_parent)
> {
> }
> +static inline void clk_debug_unregister(struct clk *clk)
> +{
> +}
> #endif
>
> /* caller must hold prepare_lock */
> @@ -1790,9 +1812,42 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_register);
> * clk_unregister - unregister a currently registered clock
> * @clk: clock to unregister
> *
> - * Currently unimplemented.
> */
> -void clk_unregister(struct clk *clk) {}
> +void clk_unregister(struct clk *clk)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + if (!clk)
> + return;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&prepare_lock);
> + if (clk->prepare_count) {
> + pr_debug("%s: can't unregister clk %s, it is prepared\n",
> + __func__, clk->name);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + if (!hlist_empty(&clk->children)) {
> + pr_debug("%s: clk %s has registered children\n",
> + __func__, clk->name);
> + goto out;
> + }
We could migrate the children to the orphan list instead of leaving the
clock in place. Maybe something like:
struct clk *child;
/* reparent all children to the orphan list */
hlist_for_each_entry(child, &clk->children, child_node)
clk_set_parent(child, NULL);
What do you think? Does this cause any issues in your module
load/unload testing?
Regards,
Mike
> +
> + clk_debug_unregister(clk);
> +
> + hlist_del_init(&clk->child_node);
> +
> + kfree(clk->parents);
> + i = clk->num_parents;
> + while (--i >= 0)
> + kfree(clk->parent_names[i]);
> + kfree(clk->parent_names);
> + kfree(clk->name);
> + kfree(clk);
> +out:
> + mutex_unlock(&prepare_lock);
> + return;
> +}
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_unregister);
>
> static void devm_clk_release(struct device *dev, void *res)
> --
> 1.8.1.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-06-11 20:13 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-06-03 8:24 [PATCH v2] clk: implement clk_unregister Jiada Wang
2013-06-03 8:32 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-06-11 20:13 ` Mike Turquette
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).