From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 08:35:07 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: ux500: register LP5521 LEDs in the device tree In-Reply-To: References: <1369210331-18545-1-git-send-email-linus.walleij@stericsson.com> <20130603081805.GC3370@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20130604073507.GL3370@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 03 Jun 2013, Bryan Wu wrote: > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 1:18 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Fri, 31 May 2013, Bryan Wu wrote: > > > >> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 1:12 AM, Linus Walleij > >> wrote: > >> > From: Linus Walleij > >> > > >> > Based on pending device tree support in the LP55xx drivers > >> > we can add the correct LED and channel configuration from the > >> > ux500 device tree for all HREF variants. > >> > > >> > Cc: Milo Kim > >> > Cc: Bryan Wu > >> > Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij > >> > --- > >> > arch/arm/boot/dts/href.dtsi | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------ > >> > 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > >> > > >> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/href.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/href.dtsi > >> > index 62523f6..e315429 100644 > >> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/href.dtsi > >> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/href.dtsi > >> > @@ -63,16 +63,42 @@ > >> > }; > >> > > >> > i2c at 80128000 { > >> > - lp5521 at 0x33 { > >> > - compatible = "lp5521"; > >> > + lp5521 at 33 { > >> > >> Is this right, I guess it should be still "lp5521 at 0x33", although it's > >> just a name. > > > > What makes you say that Bryan? > > > > All other nodes drop the '0x', as it's implied. > > > > But I still got this in this patch > " bh1780 at 0x29 {" > > which is not changed. So which one should be the right? The one without the '0x' is correct. If there are any of these left over that Linus hasn't fixed yet, I'm happy to fix. -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog