From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lsorense@csclub.uwaterloo.ca (Lennart Sorensen) Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 14:55:15 -0400 Subject: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1)) In-Reply-To: <20130606172810.GE14209@lukather> References: <1370469574.18839.33.camel@localhost> <1370475609.20454.44.camel@localhost> <20130606172810.GE14209@lukather> Message-ID: <20130606185515.GA11182@csclub.uwaterloo.ca> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 07:28:10PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > I should also add that Allwinner not only talked to us already, but also > expressed interest in doing actual modern kernel development (like using > "recently" introduced kernel frameworks, like the clk framework). > > I've received patches from them already for private reviews, they began > to show up on the kernel mailing lists, they asked to be CCed on the > patches I send upstream, they're even the one that reached out to me > when the early support for their chips was released. So, like Olof said, > they aren't in a vacuum, they are very aware of the mainline kernel and > speak a decent english. > > So yes, Allwinner has an evil vendor tree (c), with a solution similar yet > inferior (because not generic enough) to the device tree, but they show > interest on going down the mainline road. Well I hope they get there soon, because they sure have some very nice chip designs at amazing prices. -- Len Sorensen