linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] dmatest: do not allow to interrupt ongoing tests
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 06:15:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130607004525.GH23045@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130605171001.GC26663@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>

On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 06:10:01PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 08:11:07AM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 23:55 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote: 
> > > On Thu, 23 May 2013, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > 
> > > > When user interrupts ongoing transfers the dmatest may end up with console
> > > > lockup, oops, or data mismatch. This patch prevents user to abort any ongoing
> > > > test.
> > > 
> > > Personally I would be against such a change. What about interrupting the 
> > > test with rmmod?
> > >  Is it still possible after this your patch or not? If not 
> > > - this doesn't seem like a good idea to me. Why don't we just fix those 
> > > bugs, that you're describing?
> > 
> > The behaviour of the module is returned to the same page by this patch
> > as it was before (w/o debugfs).
> > 
> > The user can interrupt tests by rmmod, but it will take time up to
> > timeout.
> > 
> > I appreciate if you can do a deeper analysis of what happened in
> > case Will reported.
> 
> Did this query hold up the application of this patch? I'd really like to see
> *something* in 3.10, otherwise dmatest will be broken.
I though we had some data corruption on subsequent tests, or was that different
one?

--
~Vinod

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-06-07  0:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-05-23 11:29 [PATCH] dmatest: do not allow to interrupt ongoing tests Andy Shevchenko
     [not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.1305242353210.7187@axis700.grange>
2013-05-27  7:11   ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-05 17:10     ` Will Deacon
2013-06-05 17:25       ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2013-06-05 17:33         ` Andy Shevchenko
2013-06-07  0:45       ` Vinod Koul [this message]
2013-06-07  8:44         ` Will Deacon
2013-06-07 20:45 ` Vinod Koul

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130607004525.GH23045@intel.com \
    --to=vinod.koul@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).