From: peter.chen@freescale.com (Peter Chen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: imx: clk-pllv3: change wait method for PLL lock
Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 11:33:07 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130607033306.GC21641@nchen-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130607025320.GA21641@nchen-desktop>
On Fri, Jun 07, 2013 at 10:53:20AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 02:16:47PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> > Hello
> >
> > [added jstultz to Cc:]
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 06, 2013 at 02:55:26PM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > > For tickless system, the jiffies may be updated long time (>20ms).
> > ... may not be updated for a long time ... ?
> >
> > > At high loading system, the current waiting method will cause waiting
> > > timeout, and cause a kernel dump at below case.
> > > After timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(10),
> > > the timer interrupt occurs, it updates jiffies (eg, + 2 jiffies),
> > > then return back from interrupt, the time between above operations
> > > are tiny, the PLL is still not locked, but the timeout condition is satisfied.
> > Hmm, I admit I didn't follow the tickless stuff, but still I wonder if
> > the analysis is right. I thought on tickless jiffies are updated as
> > before by the boot cpu that cannot run in tickless mode?
> >
> > Anyhow, this only affects the commit log, not the problem.
> >
>
> I add jiffies print at irq_exit (kernel/softirq.c), and it
> is not updated every jiffies.
Oh, I have not considered cpu idle condition. I think this
problem may occur the condition that irq and softirq consume
too much time.
> Meanwhile, I ran out this PLL Lock timeout issue with
> iperf test using usb ethernet gadget at current code (v3.5.7 kernel).
> After using udelay, this issue is disappeared.
>
> --
>
> Best Regards,
> Peter Chen
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-07 3:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-06 6:55 [PATCH 1/1] ARM: imx: clk-pllv3: change wait method for PLL lock Peter Chen
2013-06-06 9:21 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-07 3:28 ` Peter Chen
2013-06-06 12:16 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-06-07 2:53 ` Peter Chen
2013-06-07 3:33 ` Peter Chen [this message]
2013-06-07 7:49 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-06-07 16:47 ` John Stultz
2013-06-13 13:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130607033306.GC21641@nchen-desktop \
--to=peter.chen@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox