From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman) Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 10:49:20 +0900 Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] ARM: shmobile: r8a7778: fix Ether device name In-Reply-To: <51B77F54.8030001@cogentembedded.com> References: <201306090123.24709.sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com> <20130611074850.GE10440@verge.net.au> <51B77F54.8030001@cogentembedded.com> Message-ID: <20130612014920.GC32725@verge.net.au> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jun 11, 2013 at 11:49:40PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Hello. > > On 06/11/2013 11:48 AM, Simon Horman wrote: > > >>While recasting commit 524219146a89aee5366326c225ccd71231419d89 (ARM: shmobile: > >>R8A7778: add Ether support), I made a typo in the platform device's name: used > >>underscore instead of hyphen. > > >>However, there's now patch merged to net-next.git renaming the platform device > >>from "sh-eth" to "r8a777x-ehter", so it makes the most sense to change the name > >>straight to that one. > > >>Signed-off-by: Sergei Shtylyov > > >>--- > >>The patch is atop of the 'renesas-next-20130607' tag of the 'renesas.git' tree > >>and the USB patches I have submitted earlier. > > >>Changes in version 2: > >>- changed the platform device's name as in the patch merged to 'net-next.git'; > >>- lowercased the SoC name in the subject. > > >Thanks, I have queued this up in the soc2 branch. > >My current plan is to let that branch sit in next for a few > >days and then send a pull-request for it to be included in v3.11. > > Could you then merge the BOCK-W Ether support too? The patch > currently has some offsets applying to 'renesas-next-20130611v2', > should I respin it? I think I should be able to take it as-is. And I should be able to do so today or tomorrow. I'll let you know if I need a re-spin after all.