[PATCH v4 0/7] support Hisilicon SoC

[mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette)]

Quoting Olof Johansson (2013-06-13 12:58:01)
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 06:29:47PM +0200, Heiko St?bner wrote:
> > Am Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2013, 22:01:42 schrieb Olof Johansson:
> > > On Sat, Jun 08, 2013 at 10:47:16PM +0800, Haojian Zhuang wrote:
> > > > Changelog:
> > > > v4:
> > > > 1. Add clk gate with HIWORD mask for Rockchip.
> > > > 2. Update comments and code of HIWORD flags for mux/divider.
> > > > 3. Append a mux without HIWORD mask in Hisilicon 3620.
> > > > 4. Fix the pinmux setting in Hi4511.
> > > > 
> > > > v3:
> > > > 1. Use clk_register_mux_table().
> > > > 
> > > > v2:
> > > > 1. Reuse mux & divider driver. So append CLK_MUX_HIWORD_MASK &
> > > > CLK_DIVIDER_HIWORD_MASK for Hi3620 SoC.
> > > > 2. Fix system timer running too fast because wrong divider is choosen.
> > > > 3. Remove .init_irq in DT machine descriptor.
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > I had some comments on the last two patches. I also haven't seen any acks
> > > from Mike on any of the clock changes, which would be needed before we can
> > > pick them up. He might want to merge them into his tree as well, if so
> > > we'll have to setup a shared branch.
> > 
> > Also, if anything unexpected happens to the main hisilicon support, could you 
> > or Mike pick up the HIWORD_MASK patches anyway (if they are acceptable), 
> > because they're needed for the Rockchip stuff too.
> 
> Ok, that definitely means a topic branch would be a good idea. Mike, can you
> collect these branches on a topic that we can just pull in as a dependency
> then, please? Assuming you're happy with them, of course.

Do you mean s/branches/patches/ ?

I've pulled patches #1-#3 into clk-next, but I'd like a couple of rounds
through linux-next before I state that a given commit is stable. So
maybe early next week (it's still Saturday for me) I'll push out a
clk-for-3.11 branch that will have the hiword patches in them and the
sha1's will not change.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -Olof