From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 01:27:24 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 2/6] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove board-omap4panda.c In-Reply-To: References: <20130612163124.GD8164@atomide.com> <20130612171407.GM8164@atomide.com> <51B98F1E.1000006@ti.com> <51B99B07.1050806@ti.com> <51BEBDCD.3060104@ti.com> <87ppvlqhyy.fsf@lebrac.rtp-net.org> Message-ID: <20130617082724.GI20992@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Ming Lei [130617 01:22]: > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Arnaud Patard > wrote: > > Sricharan R writes: > > > > I hoped to have missed some mails and that people were testing pandabard > > support with full support but given what I see, the ethernet support is > > not there yet. This thread is about removing the non-DT boot. I see some > > contradiction here. Please, look again at what Thomas said in the IGEP thread: > > breaking existing support is bad and removing non-DT boot for panda with > > not-working ethernet would exactly to that. > > +1 > > Even no any USB support on Sricharan's setting. That's also related to the auxclk. Let's see what Mike says before we start adding back any legacy hacks for it. > > Yeah, I'm aware that some extra patches are being developped like the > > omap clocks one: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2541331/ but they > > don't seem to be in -next. So, again, please, wait that all needed bits > > are merged mainline before killing non-DT support (or provide 'mixed' > > support like what is/was done on kirkwood) > > Agree, please don't be too quick, :-) Too quick? The basic DT based booting has been working for a few years now to some extent on omaps :) Regards, Tony