From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: sameo@linux.intel.com (Samuel Ortiz)
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 01:56:44 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] mfd: twl4030-power: Split from twl-core into a
 dedicated module
In-Reply-To: <1369921916-7435-2-git-send-email-florian.vaussard@epfl.ch>
References: <1369921916-7435-1-git-send-email-florian.vaussard@epfl.ch>
 <1369921916-7435-2-git-send-email-florian.vaussard@epfl.ch>
Message-ID: <20130617235644.GB7998@zurbaran>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

Hi Florian,

On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 03:51:54PM +0200, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> For now, the call to twl4030-power is hard-wired inside twl-core.
> To ease the future transition to DT, make twl4030-power as a
> separate module, like what is already done for twl4030-audio
> and others.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@epfl.ch>
> ---
>  drivers/mfd/twl-core.c      |   12 ++++++---
>  drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c |   54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  include/linux/i2c/twl.h     |    1 -
>  3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Looks good, I only have one comment:

> +static struct platform_driver twl4030_power_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name	= "twl4030_power",
> +		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
> +	},
> +	.probe		= twl4030_power_probe,
> +	.remove		= twl4030_power_remove,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init twl4030_power_init(void)
> +{
> +	return platform_driver_register(&twl4030_power_driver);
>  }
> +subsys_initcall(twl4030_power_init);
> +
> +static void __exit twl4030_power_exit(void)
> +{
> +	platform_driver_unregister(&twl4030_power_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(twl4030_power_exit);
Please use module_platform_driver() here.

Cheers,
Samuel.

-- 
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/