linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com (Ezequiel Garcia)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 05/12] ARM: mvebu: Remove the harcoded BootROM window allocation
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 17:02:42 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130618200240.GB2470@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130618195111.GC6578@obsidianresearch.com>

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 01:51:11PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 04:43:31PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> 
> > > I think some kind of test is needed here. As I understand it the SMP
> > > startup uses a trampoline in the boot rom and the boot rom *must* be
> > > mapped to 0xfff00000 ?
> 
> > Yes, that's my understanding as well, but I will do some testing since
> > it should be interesting...
> 
> If it is like the earlier chips you will also have the choice of
> something based at 0, there is a register bit that sets the reset
> address.
>  
> > > Verifying the DT is setup this way and aborting if it is not seems
> > > like a good idea..
> 
> > I have no problem doing that, but to me it sounds as it's the
> > responsability of the one that writes the DT, no?
> 
> Having the kernel enforce that the DT node is present and at the right
> location, I think, is helpful for the bootloader folks to ensure they
> write correct DTs.
>

Granted. But then I wonder... why do we bother to put the BootROM in the
DT window if we're going to check for a fixed address it in any case?

> > Maybe this is a requirement for this SoC, but not for another...
> > so, why should the kernel *check* for that?
> 
> The function was called armada_xp_smp_prepare_cpus - all Armada XP's
> will work like this..
> 

Right. Silly objection.

-- 
Ezequiel Garc?a, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com

  reply	other threads:[~2013-06-18 20:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-18 11:25 [PATCH v3 00/12] MBus device tree binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] bus: mvebu-mbus: Factor out initialization details Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] bus: mvebu-mbus: Introduce device tree binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 16:14   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 17:12     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 17:16       ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:34     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 21:45       ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 18:52         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 19:08           ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 19:29             ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 19:37               ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-18 17:46   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 18:24     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 18:39       ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 18:44         ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 18:47           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 18:59             ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 19:10               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 19:27                 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 20:49                   ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 20:55                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 21:10                       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] ARM: mvebu: Initialize MBus using " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] ARM: mvebu: Remove the harcoded BootROM window allocation Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 17:39   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 19:43     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 19:51       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 20:02         ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2013-06-18 20:10           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 20:39             ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 10:02     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 16:58       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 17:58         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 18:03           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 18:17             ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] memory: mvebu-devbus: Remove address decoding window workaround Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:39   ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-18 12:17     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 12:33       ` Jason Cooper
2013-06-18 12:48         ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] ARM: mvebu: Use the preprocessor on Armada 370/XP device tree files Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] ARM: mvebu: Add MBus to Armada 370/XP device tree Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] ARM: mvebu: Add BootROM " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada 370/XP DeviceBus device tree nodes Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 16:16   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 22:09     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 22:14       ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 12:03       ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada 370 PCIe " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 16:29   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 17:15     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 17:18       ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 17:21         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2013-06-18 18:22           ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 19:02             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-18 21:20               ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:40                 ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 12:06                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 21:35   ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 11:12     ` Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-19 12:11       ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-19 16:53         ` Jason Gunthorpe
2013-06-19 18:55           ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-18 11:25 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada XP " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-06-18 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] MBus device tree binding Sebastian Hesselbarth
2013-06-18 13:07   ` Ezequiel Garcia

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130618200240.GB2470@localhost \
    --to=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).