From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: akpm@linux-foundation.org (Andrew Morton)
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 10:21:41 -0700
Subject: [PATCH -v11 resend 10/11] arm, change reboot_mode to use enum
 reboot_mode
In-Reply-To: <12642293.RmlRtOVM54@wuerfel>
References: <1370519244-49918-1-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com>
 <1370519244-49918-11-git-send-email-holt@sgi.com>
 <4169120.1k31YLDD12@wuerfel> <12642293.RmlRtOVM54@wuerfel>
Message-ID: <20130619102141.411c8e39.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:52:02 +0200 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:

> On Wednesday 19 June 2013 12:58:10 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 June 2013 06:47:23 Robin Holt wrote:
> > > Preparing to move the parsing of reboot= to generic kernel code
> > > forces the change in reboot_mode handling to use the enum.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
> > > To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
> > > Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > > Cc: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
> > > Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
> > > Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
> > > Cc: Guan Xuetao <gxt@mprc.pku.edu.cn>
> > > Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
> > > Cc: the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Arm Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
> > > Acked-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > 
> > Should we merge this through the arm-soc tree?
> > 
> > I'm getting a few conflicts with new platforms getting added
> > using the old interface.
> 
> Hmm, I realized after sending it that this patch depends on
> at least one other patch to add the 'enum'. Any suggestions
> for how to handle that?

This patchset gets a lot of rejects which I keep on fixing up.  Please
merge up early in the merge window and compile-test (and review) the
linux-next changes to make sure I didn't muck up the reject-fixing,
then we should be fine.