From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2013 10:30:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH V10 0/4] PCIe support for Samsung Exynos5440 SoC
In-Reply-To: <20130621094723.312bc331@skate>
References: <003901ce6e50$03d039a0$0b70ace0$@samsung.com>
 <201306210931.58428.arnd@arndb.de> <20130621094723.312bc331@skate>
Message-ID: <201306211030.47440.arnd@arndb.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Friday 21 June 2013, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> I am by far not an expert on how to solve merge strategies and so on,
> but to avoid conflicts at Linus's level while merging the arm-soc and
> pci trees, it would be better if this Samsung PCIe driver could go
> through arm-soc (with Bjorn ACK, of course), so that Arnd/Olof can
> make sure the ordering is correct with regard to the of/pci changes and
> the mvebu/pci driver.

Yes, good point.

The alternative would be that Bjorn also takes the PCI branch dependencies
that are already in arm-soc into his tree. Either way works, but I agree
that what you suggest would be simpler.

	Arnd