[PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs

[PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs

[Yadwinder Singh Brar]

This patch series does the following:

 1) Unifies the clk strutures  and registration function used for PLL35xx &
    PLL36xx, to factor out possible common code.

 2) Defines a common rate_table which will contain recommended p, m, s and k
    values for supported rates that needs to be changed for changing
    corresponding PLL's rate

 3) Adds set_rate() and round_rate() clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx

changes since v6:
	- Splited the patch adding samsung_clk_register_pll() into definition
	addition, SoC specific migration and cleanup patches.
	- Addressed some NIT comments.

changes since v5:
	- Corrected to use rate table as specified in UM for exynos5250 epll.
	- Took care of exynos5420 as well, as new exynos5420 clk driver came in
	while rebasing on latest Kgene's for-next.

	Since we spilted 1st patch into 2 different patches,
	can we expect "reviewed-by" again for the same? 

changes since v4:
	- Defined common samsung samsung_clk_register_pll() to register a list
	of PLL and used a struct samsung_pll_clock for passing intialisation
	data instead of passing as arguments. Now passing LOCK as well as CON0
	offset as intialisation data.
	- Calculated length of rate table while registering PLL instead of
	getting it as intialisation data.

changes since v3:
	- Used __clk_lookup() instead of adding alias for mout_vpllsrc
	- Added check for changing only M value in samsung_pll36xx_set_rate()
	- Modified samsung_pll35xx_mp_change() & samsung_pll35xx_set_rate()
	to improve readabilty.
	- Made the input rate_table as __init_data which is to be provided while
	registering PLL and made a copy of that table while registering, so
	that if multiple tables are their, they can be freed after getting the
	P, M, S, K setting values from required one.

changes since v2:
	- Added new patch to reorder the MUX registration for mout_vpllsrc MUX
	before the PLL registrations. And to add the alias for the mout_vpllsrc MUX.
        - Added a check to confirm parent rate while registrating the PLL
	rate tables.

changes since v1:
	- removed sorting and bsearch
	- modified the definition of struct "samsung_pll_rate_table"
	- added generic round_rate()
	- rectified the ops assignment for "rate table passed as NULL

Is rebased on branch kgene's "for-next"
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git/log/?h=for-next

Vikas Sajjan (3):
  clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL36xx
  clk: samsung: Reorder MUX registration for mout_vpllsrc
  clk: samsung: Add EPLL and VPLL freq table for exynos5250 SoC

Yadwinder Singh Brar (8):
  clk: samsung: Introduce a common samsung_clk_pll struct
  clk: samsung: Define a common samsung_clk_register_pll()
  clk: samsung: Migrate exynos5250 to use common
    samsung_clk_register_pll()
  clk: samsung: Migrate exynos4 to use common
    samsung_clk_register_pll()
  clk: samsung: Migrate exynos5420 to use common
    samsung_clk_register_pll()
  clk: samsung: Remove unused pll registeration code for pll35xx and
    pll36xx
  clk: samsung: Add support to register rate_table for samsung plls
  clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL35xx

 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c    |   40 +++--
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c |  101 +++++++++--
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c |   86 ++++++---
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c        |  339 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h        |   38 ++++-
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h            |   53 ++++++
 6 files changed, 519 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)

[PATCH v7 01/11] clk: samsung: Introduce a common samsung_clk_pll struct

[Yadwinder Singh Brar]

This patch unifies clk strutures used for PLL35xx & PLL36xx and
adding an extra member lock_reg, so that common code can be factored out.

Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c |   30 ++++++++++++------------------
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
index 89135f6..8224bde 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
@@ -13,6 +13,14 @@
 #include "clk.h"
 #include "clk-pll.h"
 
+struct samsung_clk_pll {
+	struct clk_hw		hw;
+	void __iomem		*lock_reg;
+	void __iomem		*con_reg;
+};
+
+#define to_clk_pll(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct samsung_clk_pll, hw)
+
 /*
  * PLL35xx Clock Type
  */
@@ -24,17 +32,10 @@
 #define PLL35XX_PDIV_SHIFT      (8)
 #define PLL35XX_SDIV_SHIFT      (0)
 
-struct samsung_clk_pll35xx {
-	struct clk_hw		hw;
-	const void __iomem	*con_reg;
-};
-
-#define to_clk_pll35xx(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct samsung_clk_pll35xx, hw)
-
 static unsigned long samsung_pll35xx_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 				unsigned long parent_rate)
 {
-	struct samsung_clk_pll35xx *pll = to_clk_pll35xx(hw);
+	struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw);
 	u32 mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, pll_con;
 	u64 fvco = parent_rate;
 
@@ -56,7 +57,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll35xx_clk_ops = {
 struct clk * __init samsung_clk_register_pll35xx(const char *name,
 			const char *pname, const void __iomem *con_reg)
 {
-	struct samsung_clk_pll35xx *pll;
+	struct samsung_clk_pll *pll;
 	struct clk *clk;
 	struct clk_init_data init;
 
@@ -100,17 +101,10 @@ struct clk * __init samsung_clk_register_pll35xx(const char *name,
 #define PLL36XX_PDIV_SHIFT	(8)
 #define PLL36XX_SDIV_SHIFT	(0)
 
-struct samsung_clk_pll36xx {
-	struct clk_hw		hw;
-	const void __iomem	*con_reg;
-};
-
-#define to_clk_pll36xx(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct samsung_clk_pll36xx, hw)
-
 static unsigned long samsung_pll36xx_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 				unsigned long parent_rate)
 {
-	struct samsung_clk_pll36xx *pll = to_clk_pll36xx(hw);
+	struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw);
 	u32 mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, kdiv, pll_con0, pll_con1;
 	u64 fvco = parent_rate;
 
@@ -135,7 +129,7 @@ static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll36xx_clk_ops = {
 struct clk * __init samsung_clk_register_pll36xx(const char *name,
 			const char *pname, const void __iomem *con_reg)
 {
-	struct samsung_clk_pll36xx *pll;
+	struct samsung_clk_pll *pll;
 	struct clk *clk;
 	struct clk_init_data init;
 
-- 
1.7.0.4

[PATCH v7 02/11] clk: samsung: Define a common samsung_clk_register_pll()

[Yadwinder Singh Brar]

This patch defines a common samsung_clk_register_pll()
Since pll2550 & pll35xx and pll2650 & pll36xx have exactly same clk ops
implementation, added pll2550 and pll2650 also.

Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c |   70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h |    7 ++++
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h     |   48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 125 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
index 8224bde..f20af69 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ struct samsung_clk_pll {
 	struct clk_hw		hw;
 	void __iomem		*lock_reg;
 	void __iomem		*con_reg;
+	enum samsung_pll_type	type;
 };
 
 #define to_clk_pll(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct samsung_clk_pll, hw)
@@ -411,3 +412,72 @@ struct clk * __init samsung_clk_register_pll2550x(const char *name,
 
 	return clk;
 }
+
+static void __init _samsung_clk_register_pll(struct samsung_pll_clock *pll_clk,
+						void __iomem *base)
+{
+	struct samsung_clk_pll *pll;
+	struct clk *clk;
+	struct clk_init_data init;
+	int ret;
+
+	pll = kzalloc(sizeof(*pll), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!pll) {
+		pr_err("%s: could not allocate pll clk %s\n",
+			__func__, pll_clk->name);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	init.name = pll_clk->name;
+	init.flags = pll_clk->flags;
+	init.parent_names = &pll_clk->parent_name;
+	init.num_parents = 1;
+
+	switch (pll_clk->type) {
+	/* clk_ops for 35xx and 2550 are similar */
+	case pll_35xx:
+	case pll_2550:
+		init.ops = &samsung_pll35xx_clk_ops;
+		break;
+	/* clk_ops for 36xx and 2650 are similar */
+	case pll_36xx:
+	case pll_2650:
+		init.ops = &samsung_pll36xx_clk_ops;
+		break;
+	default:
+		pr_warn("%s: Unknown pll type for pll clk %s\n",
+			__func__, pll_clk->name);
+	}
+
+	pll->hw.init = &init;
+	pll->type = pll_clk->type;
+	pll->lock_reg = base + pll_clk->lock_offset;
+	pll->con_reg = base + pll_clk->con_offset;
+
+	clk = clk_register(NULL, &pll->hw);
+	if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
+		pr_err("%s: failed to register pll clock %s : %ld\n",
+			__func__, pll_clk->name, PTR_ERR(clk));
+		kfree(pll);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	samsung_clk_add_lookup(clk, pll_clk->id);
+
+	if (!pll_clk->alias)
+		return;
+
+	ret = clk_register_clkdev(clk, pll_clk->alias, pll_clk->dev_name);
+	if (ret)
+		pr_err("%s: failed to register lookup for %s : %d",
+			__func__, pll_clk->name, ret);
+}
+
+void __init samsung_clk_register_pll(struct samsung_pll_clock *pll_list,
+				unsigned int nr_pll, void __iomem *base)
+{
+	int cnt;
+
+	for (cnt = 0; cnt < nr_pll; cnt++)
+		_samsung_clk_register_pll(&pll_list[cnt], base);
+}
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
index f33786e..0d86bf0 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
@@ -12,6 +12,13 @@
 #ifndef __SAMSUNG_CLK_PLL_H
 #define __SAMSUNG_CLK_PLL_H
 
+enum samsung_pll_type {
+	pll_35xx,
+	pll_36xx,
+	pll_2550,
+	pll_2650,
+};
+
 enum pll45xx_type {
 	pll_4500,
 	pll_4502,
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
index e4ad6ea..d834395 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <linux/clk-provider.h>
 #include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
+#include "clk-pll.h"
 
 /**
  * struct samsung_clock_alias: information about mux clock
@@ -258,6 +259,51 @@ struct samsung_clk_reg_dump {
 	u32	value;
 };
 
+/**
+ * struct samsung_pll_clock: information about pll clock
+ * @id: platform specific id of the clock.
+ * @dev_name: name of the device to which this clock belongs.
+ * @name: name of this pll clock.
+ * @parent_name: name of the parent clock.
+ * @flags: optional flags for basic clock.
+ * @con_offset: offset of the register for configuring the PLL.
+ * @lock_offset: offset of the register for locking the PLL.
+ * @type: Type of PLL to be registered.
+ * @alias: optional clock alias name to be assigned to this clock.
+ */
+struct samsung_pll_clock {
+	unsigned int		id;
+	const char		*dev_name;
+	const char		*name;
+	const char		*parent_name;
+	unsigned long		flags;
+	int			con_offset;
+	int			lock_offset;
+	enum samsung_pll_type	type;
+	const char              *alias;
+};
+
+#define __PLL(_typ, _id, _dname, _name, _pname, _flags, _lock, _con, _alias) \
+	{								\
+		.id		= _id,					\
+		.type		= _typ,					\
+		.dev_name	= _dname,				\
+		.name		= _name,				\
+		.parent_name	= _pname,				\
+		.flags		= CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,			\
+		.con_offset	= _con,					\
+		.lock_offset	= _lock,				\
+		.alias		= _alias,				\
+	}
+
+#define PLL(_typ, _id, _name, _pname, _lock, _con)			\
+	__PLL(_typ, _id, NULL, _name, _pname, CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,	\
+		_lock, _con, NULL)
+
+#define PLL_A(_typ, _id, _name, _pname, _lock, _con, _alias)		\
+	__PLL(_typ, _id, NULL, _name, _pname, CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,	\
+		_lock, _con, _alias)
+
 extern void __init samsung_clk_init(struct device_node *np, void __iomem *base,
 		unsigned long nr_clks, unsigned long *rdump,
 		unsigned long nr_rdump, unsigned long *soc_rdump,
@@ -281,6 +327,8 @@ extern void __init samsung_clk_register_div(struct samsung_div_clock *clk_list,
 		unsigned int nr_clk);
 extern void __init samsung_clk_register_gate(
 		struct samsung_gate_clock *clk_list, unsigned int nr_clk);
+extern void __init samsung_clk_register_pll(struct samsung_pll_clock *pll_list,
+		unsigned int nr_clk, void __iomem *base);
 
 extern unsigned long _get_rate(const char *clk_name);
 
-- 
1.7.0.4

[PATCH v7 03/11] clk: samsung: Migrate exynos5250 to use common samsung_clk_register_pll()

[Yadwinder Singh Brar]

This patch migrates exynos5250 pll registeration to use common
samsung_clk_register_pll() by intialising table of PLLs and adding PLLs to
unique id list of clocks.

Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c |   60 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
index f6e3031..4027c69 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
@@ -17,11 +17,22 @@
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
 
 #include "clk.h"
-#include "clk-pll.h"
 
+#define APLL_LOCK		0x0
+#define APLL_CON0		0x100
 #define SRC_CPU			0x200
 #define DIV_CPU0		0x500
+#define MPLL_LOCK		0x4000
+#define MPLL_CON0		0x4100
 #define SRC_CORE1		0x4204
+#define CPLL_LOCK		0x10020
+#define EPLL_LOCK		0x10030
+#define VPLL_LOCK		0x10040
+#define GPLL_LOCK		0x10050
+#define CPLL_CON0		0x10120
+#define EPLL_CON0		0x10130
+#define VPLL_CON0		0x10140
+#define GPLL_CON0		0x10150
 #define SRC_TOP0		0x10210
 #define SRC_TOP1		0x10214
 #define SRC_TOP2		0x10218
@@ -61,10 +72,18 @@
 #define GATE_IP_FSYS		0x10944
 #define GATE_IP_PERIC		0x10950
 #define GATE_IP_PERIS		0x10960
+#define BPLL_LOCK		0x20010
+#define BPLL_CON0		0x20110
 #define SRC_CDREX		0x20200
 #define PLL_DIV2_SEL		0x20a24
 #define GATE_IP_DISP1		0x10928
 
+/* list of PLLs to be registered */
+enum exynos5250_plls {
+	apll, mpll, cpll, epll, vpll, gpll, bpll,
+	nr_plls			/* number of PLLs */
+};
+
 /*
  * Let each supported clock get a unique id. This id is used to lookup the clock
  * for device tree based platforms. The clocks are categorized into three
@@ -81,7 +100,8 @@ enum exynos5250_clks {
 	none,
 
 	/* core clocks */
-	fin_pll,
+	fin_pll, fout_apll, fout_mpll, fout_bpll, fout_gpll, fout_cpll,
+	fout_epll, fout_vpll,
 
 	/* gate for special clocks (sclk) */
 	sclk_cam_bayer = 128, sclk_cam0, sclk_cam1, sclk_gscl_wa, sclk_gscl_wb,
@@ -475,6 +495,23 @@ static struct samsung_gate_clock exynos5250_gate_clks[] __initdata = {
 	GATE(g3d, "g3d", "aclk_400_g3d", GATE_IP_G3D, 0, 0, 0),
 };
 
+struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos5250_plls[nr_plls] = {
+	[apll] = PLL_A(pll_35xx, fout_apll, "fout_apll", "fin_pll", APLL_LOCK,
+		APLL_CON0, "fout_apll"),
+	[mpll] = PLL_A(pll_35xx, fout_mpll, "fout_mpll", "fin_pll", MPLL_LOCK,
+		MPLL_CON0, "fout_mpll"),
+	[bpll] = PLL(pll_35xx, fout_bpll, "fout_bpll", "fin_pll", BPLL_LOCK,
+		BPLL_CON0),
+	[gpll] = PLL(pll_35xx, fout_gpll, "fout_gpll", "fin_pll", GPLL_LOCK,
+		GPLL_CON0),
+	[cpll] = PLL(pll_35xx, fout_cpll, "fout_cpll", "fin_pll", CPLL_LOCK,
+		CPLL_CON0),
+	[epll] = PLL(pll_36xx, fout_epll, "fout_epll", "fin_pll", EPLL_LOCK,
+		EPLL_CON0),
+	[vpll] = PLL(pll_36xx, fout_vpll, "fout_vpll", "mout_vpllsrc",
+		VPLL_LOCK, VPLL_CON0),
+};
+
 static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "samsung,clock-xxti", .data = (void *)0, },
 	{ },
@@ -484,7 +521,6 @@ static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = {
 static void __init exynos5250_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
 {
 	void __iomem *reg_base;
-	struct clk *apll, *mpll, *epll, *vpll, *bpll, *gpll, *cpll;
 
 	if (np) {
 		reg_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
@@ -500,22 +536,8 @@ static void __init exynos5250_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
 	samsung_clk_of_register_fixed_ext(exynos5250_fixed_rate_ext_clks,
 			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_fixed_rate_ext_clks),
 			ext_clk_match);
-
-	apll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_apll", "fin_pll",
-			reg_base + 0x100);
-	mpll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_mpll", "fin_pll",
-			reg_base + 0x4100);
-	bpll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_bpll", "fin_pll",
-			reg_base + 0x20110);
-	gpll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_gpll", "fin_pll",
-			reg_base + 0x10150);
-	cpll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_cpll", "fin_pll",
-			reg_base + 0x10120);
-	epll = samsung_clk_register_pll36xx("fout_epll", "fin_pll",
-			reg_base + 0x10130);
-	vpll = samsung_clk_register_pll36xx("fout_vpll", "mout_vpllsrc",
-			reg_base + 0x10140);
-
+	samsung_clk_register_pll(exynos5250_plls, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_plls),
+					reg_base);
 	samsung_clk_register_fixed_rate(exynos5250_fixed_rate_clks,
 			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_fixed_rate_clks));
 	samsung_clk_register_fixed_factor(exynos5250_fixed_factor_clks,
-- 
1.7.0.4

[PATCH v7 04/11] clk: samsung: Migrate exynos4 to use common samsung_clk_register_pll()

[Yadwinder Singh Brar]

This patch migrates exynos4 pll registeration to use common
samsung_clk_register_pll() by intialising table of PLLs.

Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c |   40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 1 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c
index 50af410..f2c2156 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
 
 #include "clk.h"
-#include "clk-pll.h"
 
 /* Exynos4 clock controller register offsets */
 #define SRC_LEFTBUS		0x4200
@@ -97,12 +96,14 @@
 #define GATE_IP_PERIL		0xc950
 #define E4210_GATE_IP_PERIR	0xc960
 #define GATE_BLOCK		0xc970
+#define E4X12_MPLL_LOCK		0x10008
 #define E4X12_MPLL_CON0		0x10108
 #define SRC_DMC			0x10200
 #define SRC_MASK_DMC		0x10300
 #define DIV_DMC0		0x10500
 #define DIV_DMC1		0x10504
 #define GATE_IP_DMC		0x10900
+#define APLL_LOCK		0x14000
 #define APLL_CON0		0x14100
 #define E4210_MPLL_CON0		0x14108
 #define SRC_CPU			0x14200
@@ -121,6 +122,12 @@ enum exynos4_soc {
 	EXYNOS4X12,
 };
 
+/* list of PLLs to be registered */
+enum exynos4_plls {
+	apll, mpll, epll, vpll,
+	nr_plls			/* number of PLLs */
+};
+
 /*
  * Let each supported clock get a unique id. This id is used to lookup the clock
  * for device tree based platforms. The clocks are categorized into three
@@ -990,6 +997,17 @@ static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = {
 	{},
 };
 
+struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos4_plls[nr_plls] = {
+	[apll] = PLL_A(pll_35xx, fout_apll, "fout_apll", "fin_pll", APLL_LOCK,
+		APLL_CON0, "fout_apll"),
+	[mpll] = PLL_A(pll_35xx, fout_mpll, "fout_mpll", "fin_pll",
+		E4X12_MPLL_LOCK, E4X12_MPLL_CON0, "fout_mpll"),
+	[epll] = PLL_A(pll_36xx, fout_epll, "fout_epll", "fin_pll", EPLL_LOCK,
+		EPLL_CON0, "fout_epll"),
+	[vpll] = PLL_A(pll_36xx, fout_vpll, "fout_vpll", "fin_pll", VPLL_LOCK,
+		VPLL_CON0, "fout_vpll"),
+};
+
 /* register exynos4 clocks */
 void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, enum exynos4_soc exynos4_soc, void __iomem *reg_base, unsigned long xom)
 {
@@ -1026,22 +1044,16 @@ void __init exynos4_clk_init(struct device_node *np, enum exynos4_soc exynos4_so
 					reg_base + EPLL_CON0, pll_4600);
 		vpll = samsung_clk_register_pll46xx("fout_vpll", "mout_vpllsrc",
 					reg_base + VPLL_CON0, pll_4650c);
+
+		samsung_clk_add_lookup(apll, fout_apll);
+		samsung_clk_add_lookup(mpll, fout_mpll);
+		samsung_clk_add_lookup(epll, fout_epll);
+		samsung_clk_add_lookup(vpll, fout_vpll);
 	} else {
-		apll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_apll", "fin_pll",
-					reg_base + APLL_CON0);
-		mpll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_mpll", "fin_pll",
-					reg_base + E4X12_MPLL_CON0);
-		epll = samsung_clk_register_pll36xx("fout_epll", "fin_pll",
-					reg_base + EPLL_CON0);
-		vpll = samsung_clk_register_pll36xx("fout_vpll", "fin_pll",
-					reg_base + VPLL_CON0);
+		samsung_clk_register_pll(exynos4_plls,
+					ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4_plls), reg_base);
 	}
 
-	samsung_clk_add_lookup(apll, fout_apll);
-	samsung_clk_add_lookup(mpll, fout_mpll);
-	samsung_clk_add_lookup(epll, fout_epll);
-	samsung_clk_add_lookup(vpll, fout_vpll);
-
 	samsung_clk_register_fixed_rate(exynos4_fixed_rate_clks,
 			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos4_fixed_rate_clks));
 	samsung_clk_register_mux(exynos4_mux_clks,
-- 
1.7.0.4

[PATCH v7 05/11] clk: samsung: Migrate exynos5420 to use common samsung_clk_register_pll()

[Yadwinder Singh Brar]

This patch migrates exynos5420 pll registeration to use common
samsung_clk_register_pll() by intialising table of PLLs and adding PLLs to
unique id list of clocks.

Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c |   86 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
 1 files changed, 58 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
index 68a96cb..3ea6b4f 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
@@ -17,13 +17,30 @@
 #include <linux/of_address.h>
 
 #include "clk.h"
-#include "clk-pll.h"
 
+#define APLL_LOCK		0x0
+#define APLL_CON0		0x100
 #define SRC_CPU			0x200
 #define DIV_CPU0		0x500
 #define DIV_CPU1		0x504
 #define GATE_BUS_CPU		0x700
 #define GATE_SCLK_CPU		0x800
+#define CPLL_LOCK		0x10020
+#define DPLL_LOCK		0x10030
+#define EPLL_LOCK		0x10040
+#define RPLL_LOCK		0x10050
+#define IPLL_LOCK		0x10060
+#define SPLL_LOCK		0x10070
+#define VPLL_LOCK		0x10070
+#define MPLL_LOCK		0x10090
+#define CPLL_CON0		0x10120
+#define DPLL_CON0		0x10128
+#define EPLL_CON0		0x10130
+#define RPLL_CON0		0x10140
+#define IPLL_CON0		0x10150
+#define SPLL_CON0		0x10160
+#define VPLL_CON0		0x10170
+#define MPLL_CON0		0x10180
 #define SRC_TOP0		0x10200
 #define SRC_TOP1		0x10204
 #define SRC_TOP2		0x10208
@@ -75,15 +92,27 @@
 #define GATE_TOP_SCLK_MAU	0x1083c
 #define GATE_TOP_SCLK_FSYS	0x10840
 #define GATE_TOP_SCLK_PERIC	0x10850
+#define BPLL_LOCK		0x20010
+#define BPLL_CON0		0x20110
 #define SRC_CDREX		0x20200
+#define KPLL_LOCK		0x28000
+#define KPLL_CON0		0x28100
 #define SRC_KFC			0x28200
 #define DIV_KFC0		0x28500
 
+/* list of PLLs */
+enum exynos5420_plls {
+	apll, cpll, dpll, epll, rpll, ipll, spll, vpll, mpll,
+	bpll, kpll,
+	nr_plls			/* number of PLLs */
+};
+
 enum exynos5420_clks {
 	none,
 
 	/* core clocks */
-	fin_pll,
+	fin_pll,  fout_apll, fout_cpll, fout_dpll, fout_epll, fout_rpll,
+	fout_ipll, fout_spll, fout_vpll, fout_mpll, fout_bpll, fout_kpll,
 
 	/* gate for special clocks (sclk) */
 	sclk_uart0 = 128, sclk_uart1, sclk_uart2, sclk_uart3, sclk_mmc0,
@@ -698,6 +727,31 @@ struct samsung_gate_clock exynos5420_gate_clks[] __initdata = {
 	GATE(smmu_mscl2, "smmu_mscl2", "aclk400_mscl", GATE_IP_MSCL, 10, 0, 0),
 };
 
+struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos5420_plls[nr_plls] = {
+	[apll] = PLL(pll_2550, fout_apll, "fout_apll", "fin_pll", APLL_LOCK,
+		APLL_CON0),
+	[cpll] = PLL(pll_2550, fout_mpll, "fout_mpll", "fin_pll", MPLL_LOCK,
+		MPLL_CON0),
+	[dpll] = PLL(pll_2550, fout_dpll, "fout_dpll", "fin_pll", DPLL_LOCK,
+		DPLL_CON0),
+	[epll] = PLL(pll_2650, fout_epll, "fout_epll", "fin_pll", EPLL_LOCK,
+		EPLL_CON0),
+	[rpll] = PLL(pll_2650, fout_rpll, "fout_rpll", "fin_pll", RPLL_LOCK,
+		RPLL_CON0),
+	[ipll] = PLL(pll_2550, fout_ipll, "fout_ipll", "fin_pll", IPLL_LOCK,
+		IPLL_CON0),
+	[spll] = PLL(pll_2550, fout_spll, "fout_spll", "fin_pll", SPLL_LOCK,
+		SPLL_CON0),
+	[vpll] = PLL(pll_2550, fout_vpll, "fout_vpll", "fin_pll", VPLL_LOCK,
+		VPLL_CON0),
+	[mpll] = PLL(pll_2550, fout_mpll, "fout_mpll", "fin_pll", MPLL_LOCK,
+		MPLL_CON0),
+	[bpll] = PLL(pll_2550, fout_bpll, "fout_bpll", "fin_pll", BPLL_LOCK,
+		BPLL_CON0),
+	[kpll] = PLL(pll_2550, fout_kpll, "fout_kpll", "fin_pll", KPLL_LOCK,
+		KPLL_CON0),
+};
+
 static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-oscclk", .data = (void *)0, },
 	{ },
@@ -707,8 +761,6 @@ static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = {
 void __init exynos5420_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
 {
 	void __iomem *reg_base;
-	struct clk *apll, *bpll, *cpll, *dpll, *epll, *ipll, *kpll, *mpll;
-	struct clk *rpll, *spll, *vpll;
 
 	if (np) {
 		reg_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
@@ -724,30 +776,8 @@ void __init exynos5420_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
 	samsung_clk_of_register_fixed_ext(exynos5420_fixed_rate_ext_clks,
 			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5420_fixed_rate_ext_clks),
 			ext_clk_match);
-
-	apll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_apll", "fin_pll",
-			reg_base + 0x100);
-	bpll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_bpll", "fin_pll",
-			reg_base + 0x20110);
-	cpll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_cpll", "fin_pll",
-			reg_base + 0x10120);
-	dpll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_dpll", "fin_pll",
-			reg_base + 0x10128);
-	epll = samsung_clk_register_pll36xx("fout_epll", "fin_pll",
-			reg_base + 0x10130);
-	ipll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_ipll", "fin_pll",
-			reg_base + 0x10150);
-	kpll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_kpll", "fin_pll",
-			reg_base + 0x28100);
-	mpll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_mpll", "fin_pll",
-			reg_base + 0x10180);
-	rpll = samsung_clk_register_pll36xx("fout_rpll", "fin_pll",
-			reg_base + 0x10140);
-	spll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_spll", "fin_pll",
-			reg_base + 0x10160);
-	vpll = samsung_clk_register_pll35xx("fout_vpll", "fin_pll",
-			reg_base + 0x10170);
-
+	samsung_clk_register_pll(exynos5420_plls, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5420_plls),
+					reg_base);
 	samsung_clk_register_fixed_rate(exynos5420_fixed_rate_clks,
 			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5420_fixed_rate_clks));
 	samsung_clk_register_fixed_factor(exynos5420_fixed_factor_clks,
-- 
1.7.0.4

[PATCH v7 06/11] clk: samsung: Remove unused pll registeration code for pll35xx and pll36xx

[Yadwinder Singh Brar]

This patch removes samsung_clk_register_pll35xx() and
samsung_clk_register_pll36xx() registaration functions as users migrated to
new samsung_clk_register_pll().

Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c |   70 -----------------------------------------
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h |    4 --
 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
index f20af69..7d5bea8 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
@@ -55,41 +55,6 @@ static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll35xx_clk_ops = {
 	.recalc_rate = samsung_pll35xx_recalc_rate,
 };
 
-struct clk * __init samsung_clk_register_pll35xx(const char *name,
-			const char *pname, const void __iomem *con_reg)
-{
-	struct samsung_clk_pll *pll;
-	struct clk *clk;
-	struct clk_init_data init;
-
-	pll = kzalloc(sizeof(*pll), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!pll) {
-		pr_err("%s: could not allocate pll clk %s\n", __func__, name);
-		return NULL;
-	}
-
-	init.name = name;
-	init.ops = &samsung_pll35xx_clk_ops;
-	init.flags = CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE;
-	init.parent_names = &pname;
-	init.num_parents = 1;
-
-	pll->hw.init = &init;
-	pll->con_reg = con_reg;
-
-	clk = clk_register(NULL, &pll->hw);
-	if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
-		pr_err("%s: failed to register pll clock %s\n", __func__,
-				name);
-		kfree(pll);
-	}
-
-	if (clk_register_clkdev(clk, name, NULL))
-		pr_err("%s: failed to register lookup for %s", __func__, name);
-
-	return clk;
-}
-
 /*
  * PLL36xx Clock Type
  */
@@ -127,41 +92,6 @@ static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll36xx_clk_ops = {
 	.recalc_rate = samsung_pll36xx_recalc_rate,
 };
 
-struct clk * __init samsung_clk_register_pll36xx(const char *name,
-			const char *pname, const void __iomem *con_reg)
-{
-	struct samsung_clk_pll *pll;
-	struct clk *clk;
-	struct clk_init_data init;
-
-	pll = kzalloc(sizeof(*pll), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!pll) {
-		pr_err("%s: could not allocate pll clk %s\n", __func__, name);
-		return NULL;
-	}
-
-	init.name = name;
-	init.ops = &samsung_pll36xx_clk_ops;
-	init.flags = CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE;
-	init.parent_names = &pname;
-	init.num_parents = 1;
-
-	pll->hw.init = &init;
-	pll->con_reg = con_reg;
-
-	clk = clk_register(NULL, &pll->hw);
-	if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
-		pr_err("%s: failed to register pll clock %s\n", __func__,
-				name);
-		kfree(pll);
-	}
-
-	if (clk_register_clkdev(clk, name, NULL))
-		pr_err("%s: failed to register lookup for %s", __func__, name);
-
-	return clk;
-}
-
 /*
  * PLL45xx Clock Type
  */
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
index 0d86bf0..1536f27 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
@@ -31,10 +31,6 @@ enum pll46xx_type {
 	pll_4650c,
 };
 
-extern struct clk * __init samsung_clk_register_pll35xx(const char *name,
-			const char *pname, const void __iomem *con_reg);
-extern struct clk * __init samsung_clk_register_pll36xx(const char *name,
-			const char *pname, const void __iomem *con_reg);
 extern struct clk * __init samsung_clk_register_pll45xx(const char *name,
 			const char *pname, const void __iomem *con_reg,
 			enum pll45xx_type type);
-- 
1.7.0.4

[PATCH v7 07/11] clk: samsung: Add support to register rate_table for samsung plls

[Yadwinder Singh Brar]

This patch defines a common rate_table which will contain recommended p, m, s,
k values for supported rates that needs to be changed for changing
corresponding PLL's rate.

Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c    |    8 ++++----
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c |   14 +++++++-------
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c |   22 +++++++++++-----------
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c        |   19 ++++++++++++++++++-
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h        |   27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h            |   13 ++++++++-----
 6 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c
index f2c2156..c270eb0 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c
@@ -999,13 +999,13 @@ static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = {
 
 struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos4_plls[nr_plls] = {
 	[apll] = PLL_A(pll_35xx, fout_apll, "fout_apll", "fin_pll", APLL_LOCK,
-		APLL_CON0, "fout_apll"),
+		APLL_CON0, "fout_apll", NULL),
 	[mpll] = PLL_A(pll_35xx, fout_mpll, "fout_mpll", "fin_pll",
-		E4X12_MPLL_LOCK, E4X12_MPLL_CON0, "fout_mpll"),
+		E4X12_MPLL_LOCK, E4X12_MPLL_CON0, "fout_mpll", NULL),
 	[epll] = PLL_A(pll_36xx, fout_epll, "fout_epll", "fin_pll", EPLL_LOCK,
-		EPLL_CON0, "fout_epll"),
+		EPLL_CON0, "fout_epll", NULL),
 	[vpll] = PLL_A(pll_36xx, fout_vpll, "fout_vpll", "fin_pll", VPLL_LOCK,
-		VPLL_CON0, "fout_vpll"),
+		VPLL_CON0, "fout_vpll", NULL),
 };
 
 /* register exynos4 clocks */
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
index 4027c69..623ae44 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
@@ -497,19 +497,19 @@ static struct samsung_gate_clock exynos5250_gate_clks[] __initdata = {
 
 struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos5250_plls[nr_plls] = {
 	[apll] = PLL_A(pll_35xx, fout_apll, "fout_apll", "fin_pll", APLL_LOCK,
-		APLL_CON0, "fout_apll"),
+		APLL_CON0, "fout_apll", NULL),
 	[mpll] = PLL_A(pll_35xx, fout_mpll, "fout_mpll", "fin_pll", MPLL_LOCK,
-		MPLL_CON0, "fout_mpll"),
+		MPLL_CON0, "fout_mpll", NULL),
 	[bpll] = PLL(pll_35xx, fout_bpll, "fout_bpll", "fin_pll", BPLL_LOCK,
-		BPLL_CON0),
+		BPLL_CON0, NULL),
 	[gpll] = PLL(pll_35xx, fout_gpll, "fout_gpll", "fin_pll", GPLL_LOCK,
-		GPLL_CON0),
+		GPLL_CON0, NULL),
 	[cpll] = PLL(pll_35xx, fout_cpll, "fout_cpll", "fin_pll", CPLL_LOCK,
-		CPLL_CON0),
+		CPLL_CON0, NULL),
 	[epll] = PLL(pll_36xx, fout_epll, "fout_epll", "fin_pll", EPLL_LOCK,
-		EPLL_CON0),
+		EPLL_CON0, NULL),
 	[vpll] = PLL(pll_36xx, fout_vpll, "fout_vpll", "mout_vpllsrc",
-		VPLL_LOCK, VPLL_CON0),
+		VPLL_LOCK, VPLL_CON0, NULL),
 };
 
 static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = {
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
index 3ea6b4f..86dfc64 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c
@@ -729,27 +729,27 @@ struct samsung_gate_clock exynos5420_gate_clks[] __initdata = {
 
 struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos5420_plls[nr_plls] = {
 	[apll] = PLL(pll_2550, fout_apll, "fout_apll", "fin_pll", APLL_LOCK,
-		APLL_CON0),
+		APLL_CON0, NULL),
 	[cpll] = PLL(pll_2550, fout_mpll, "fout_mpll", "fin_pll", MPLL_LOCK,
-		MPLL_CON0),
+		MPLL_CON0, NULL),
 	[dpll] = PLL(pll_2550, fout_dpll, "fout_dpll", "fin_pll", DPLL_LOCK,
-		DPLL_CON0),
+		DPLL_CON0, NULL),
 	[epll] = PLL(pll_2650, fout_epll, "fout_epll", "fin_pll", EPLL_LOCK,
-		EPLL_CON0),
+		EPLL_CON0, NULL),
 	[rpll] = PLL(pll_2650, fout_rpll, "fout_rpll", "fin_pll", RPLL_LOCK,
-		RPLL_CON0),
+		RPLL_CON0, NULL),
 	[ipll] = PLL(pll_2550, fout_ipll, "fout_ipll", "fin_pll", IPLL_LOCK,
-		IPLL_CON0),
+		IPLL_CON0, NULL),
 	[spll] = PLL(pll_2550, fout_spll, "fout_spll", "fin_pll", SPLL_LOCK,
-		SPLL_CON0),
+		SPLL_CON0, NULL),
 	[vpll] = PLL(pll_2550, fout_vpll, "fout_vpll", "fin_pll", VPLL_LOCK,
-		VPLL_CON0),
+		VPLL_CON0, NULL),
 	[mpll] = PLL(pll_2550, fout_mpll, "fout_mpll", "fin_pll", MPLL_LOCK,
-		MPLL_CON0),
+		MPLL_CON0, NULL),
 	[bpll] = PLL(pll_2550, fout_bpll, "fout_bpll", "fin_pll", BPLL_LOCK,
-		BPLL_CON0),
+		BPLL_CON0, NULL),
 	[kpll] = PLL(pll_2550, fout_kpll, "fout_kpll", "fin_pll", KPLL_LOCK,
-		KPLL_CON0),
+		KPLL_CON0, NULL),
 };
 
 static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = {
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
index 7d5bea8..adc0659 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
@@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ struct samsung_clk_pll {
 	void __iomem		*lock_reg;
 	void __iomem		*con_reg;
 	enum samsung_pll_type	type;
+	unsigned int		rate_count;
+	const struct samsung_pll_rate_table *rate_table;
 };
 
 #define to_clk_pll(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct samsung_clk_pll, hw)
@@ -349,7 +351,7 @@ static void __init _samsung_clk_register_pll(struct samsung_pll_clock *pll_clk,
 	struct samsung_clk_pll *pll;
 	struct clk *clk;
 	struct clk_init_data init;
-	int ret;
+	int ret, len;
 
 	pll = kzalloc(sizeof(*pll), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!pll) {
@@ -363,6 +365,21 @@ static void __init _samsung_clk_register_pll(struct samsung_pll_clock *pll_clk,
 	init.parent_names = &pll_clk->parent_name;
 	init.num_parents = 1;
 
+	if (pll_clk->rate_table) {
+		/* find count of rates in rate_table */
+		for (len = 0; pll_clk->rate_table[len].rate != 0; )
+			len++;
+
+		pll->rate_count = len;
+		pll->rate_table = kmemdup(pll_clk->rate_table,
+					pll->rate_count *
+					sizeof(struct samsung_pll_rate_table),
+					GFP_KERNEL);
+		WARN(!pll->rate_table,
+			"%s: could not allocate rate table for %s\n",
+			__func__, pll_clk->name);
+	}
+
 	switch (pll_clk->type) {
 	/* clk_ops for 35xx and 2550 are similar */
 	case pll_35xx:
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
index 1536f27..95ae23d 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
@@ -19,6 +19,33 @@ enum samsung_pll_type {
 	pll_2650,
 };
 
+#define PLL_35XX_RATE(_rate, _m, _p, _s)			\
+	{							\
+		.rate	=	(_rate),				\
+		.mdiv	=	(_m),				\
+		.pdiv	=	(_p),				\
+		.sdiv	=	(_s),				\
+	}
+
+#define PLL_36XX_RATE(_rate, _m, _p, _s, _k)			\
+	{							\
+		.rate	=	(_rate),				\
+		.mdiv	=	(_m),				\
+		.pdiv	=	(_p),				\
+		.sdiv	=	(_s),				\
+		.kdiv	=	(_k),				\
+	}
+
+/* NOTE: Rate table should be kept sorted in descending order. */
+
+struct samsung_pll_rate_table {
+	unsigned int rate;
+	unsigned int pdiv;
+	unsigned int mdiv;
+	unsigned int sdiv;
+	unsigned int kdiv;
+};
+
 enum pll45xx_type {
 	pll_4500,
 	pll_4502,
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
index d834395..4a003d7 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
@@ -280,10 +280,12 @@ struct samsung_pll_clock {
 	int			con_offset;
 	int			lock_offset;
 	enum samsung_pll_type	type;
+	const struct samsung_pll_rate_table *rate_table;
 	const char              *alias;
 };
 
-#define __PLL(_typ, _id, _dname, _name, _pname, _flags, _lock, _con, _alias) \
+#define __PLL(_typ, _id, _dname, _name, _pname, _flags, _lock, _con,	\
+		_rtable, _alias)					\
 	{								\
 		.id		= _id,					\
 		.type		= _typ,					\
@@ -293,16 +295,17 @@ struct samsung_pll_clock {
 		.flags		= CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,			\
 		.con_offset	= _con,					\
 		.lock_offset	= _lock,				\
+		.rate_table	= _rtable,				\
 		.alias		= _alias,				\
 	}
 
-#define PLL(_typ, _id, _name, _pname, _lock, _con)			\
+#define PLL(_typ, _id, _name, _pname, _lock, _con, _rtable)	\
 	__PLL(_typ, _id, NULL, _name, _pname, CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,	\
-		_lock, _con, NULL)
+		_lock, _con, _rtable, _name)
 
-#define PLL_A(_typ, _id, _name, _pname, _lock, _con, _alias)		\
+#define PLL_A(_typ, _id, _name, _pname, _lock, _con, _alias, _rtable) \
 	__PLL(_typ, _id, NULL, _name, _pname, CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE,	\
-		_lock, _con, _alias)
+		_lock, _con, _rtable, _alias)
 
 extern void __init samsung_clk_init(struct device_node *np, void __iomem *base,
 		unsigned long nr_clks, unsigned long *rdump,
-- 
1.7.0.4

[PATCH v7 08/11] clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL35xx

[Yadwinder Singh Brar]

This patch add set_rate() and round_rate() for PLL35xx

Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c |  105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
index adc0659..b5c8b15 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
@@ -24,16 +24,51 @@ struct samsung_clk_pll {
 
 #define to_clk_pll(_hw) container_of(_hw, struct samsung_clk_pll, hw)
 
+static const struct samsung_pll_rate_table *samsung_get_pll_settings(
+				struct samsung_clk_pll *pll, unsigned long rate)
+{
+	const struct samsung_pll_rate_table  *rate_table = pll->rate_table;
+	int i;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < pll->rate_count; i++) {
+		if (rate == rate_table[i].rate)
+			return &rate_table[i];
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+static long samsung_pll_round_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
+			unsigned long drate, unsigned long *prate)
+{
+	struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw);
+	const struct samsung_pll_rate_table *rate_table = pll->rate_table;
+	int i;
+
+	/* Assumming rate_table is in descending order */
+	for (i = 0; i < pll->rate_count; i++) {
+		if (drate >= rate_table[i].rate)
+			return rate_table[i].rate;
+	}
+
+	/* return minimum supported value */
+	return rate_table[i - 1].rate;
+}
+
 /*
  * PLL35xx Clock Type
  */
+/* Maximum lock time can be 270 * PDIV cycles */
+#define PLL35XX_LOCK_FACTOR	(270)
 
 #define PLL35XX_MDIV_MASK       (0x3FF)
 #define PLL35XX_PDIV_MASK       (0x3F)
 #define PLL35XX_SDIV_MASK       (0x7)
+#define PLL35XX_LOCK_STAT_MASK	(0x1)
 #define PLL35XX_MDIV_SHIFT      (16)
 #define PLL35XX_PDIV_SHIFT      (8)
 #define PLL35XX_SDIV_SHIFT      (0)
+#define PLL35XX_LOCK_STAT_SHIFT	(29)
 
 static unsigned long samsung_pll35xx_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 				unsigned long parent_rate)
@@ -53,8 +88,73 @@ static unsigned long samsung_pll35xx_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	return (unsigned long)fvco;
 }
 
+static inline bool samsung_pll35xx_mp_change(
+		const struct samsung_pll_rate_table *rate, u32 pll_con)
+{
+	u32 old_mdiv, old_pdiv;
+
+	old_mdiv = (pll_con >> PLL35XX_MDIV_SHIFT) & PLL35XX_MDIV_MASK;
+	old_pdiv = (pll_con >> PLL35XX_PDIV_SHIFT) & PLL35XX_PDIV_MASK;
+
+	return (rate->mdiv != old_mdiv || rate->pdiv != old_pdiv);
+}
+
+static int samsung_pll35xx_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate,
+					unsigned long prate)
+{
+	struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw);
+	const struct samsung_pll_rate_table *rate;
+	u32 tmp;
+
+	/* Get required rate settings from table */
+	rate = samsung_get_pll_settings(pll, drate);
+	if (!rate) {
+		pr_err("%s: Invalid rate : %lu for pll clk %s\n", __func__,
+			drate, __clk_get_name(hw->clk));
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	tmp = __raw_readl(pll->con_reg);
+
+	if (!(samsung_pll35xx_mp_change(rate, tmp))) {
+		/* If only s change, change just s value only*/
+		tmp &= ~(PLL35XX_SDIV_MASK << PLL35XX_SDIV_SHIFT);
+		tmp |= rate->sdiv << PLL35XX_SDIV_SHIFT;
+		__raw_writel(tmp, pll->con_reg);
+
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	/* Set PLL lock time. */
+	__raw_writel(rate->pdiv * PLL35XX_LOCK_FACTOR,
+			pll->lock_reg);
+
+	/* Change PLL PMS values */
+	tmp &= ~((PLL35XX_MDIV_MASK << PLL35XX_MDIV_SHIFT) |
+			(PLL35XX_PDIV_MASK << PLL35XX_PDIV_SHIFT) |
+			(PLL35XX_SDIV_MASK << PLL35XX_SDIV_SHIFT));
+	tmp |= (rate->mdiv << PLL35XX_MDIV_SHIFT) |
+			(rate->pdiv << PLL35XX_PDIV_SHIFT) |
+			(rate->sdiv << PLL35XX_SDIV_SHIFT);
+	__raw_writel(tmp, pll->con_reg);
+
+	/* wait_lock_time */
+	do {
+		cpu_relax();
+		tmp = __raw_readl(pll->con_reg);
+	} while (!(tmp & (PLL35XX_LOCK_STAT_MASK
+				<< PLL35XX_LOCK_STAT_SHIFT)));
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll35xx_clk_ops = {
 	.recalc_rate = samsung_pll35xx_recalc_rate,
+	.round_rate = samsung_pll_round_rate,
+	.set_rate = samsung_pll35xx_set_rate,
+};
+
+static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll35xx_clk_min_ops = {
+	.recalc_rate = samsung_pll35xx_recalc_rate,
 };
 
 /*
@@ -384,7 +484,10 @@ static void __init _samsung_clk_register_pll(struct samsung_pll_clock *pll_clk,
 	/* clk_ops for 35xx and 2550 are similar */
 	case pll_35xx:
 	case pll_2550:
-		init.ops = &samsung_pll35xx_clk_ops;
+		if (!pll->rate_table)
+			init.ops = &samsung_pll35xx_clk_min_ops;
+		else
+			init.ops = &samsung_pll35xx_clk_ops;
 		break;
 	/* clk_ops for 36xx and 2650 are similar */
 	case pll_36xx:
-- 
1.7.0.4

[PATCH v7 09/11] clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL36xx

[Yadwinder Singh Brar]

From: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@linaro.org>

This patch adds set_rate and round_rate clk_ops for PLL36xx

Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c |   79 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
index b5c8b15..66cb1cb 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
@@ -160,6 +160,8 @@ static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll35xx_clk_min_ops = {
 /*
  * PLL36xx Clock Type
  */
+/* Maximum lock time can be 3000 * PDIV cycles */
+#define PLL36XX_LOCK_FACTOR    (3000)
 
 #define PLL36XX_KDIV_MASK	(0xFFFF)
 #define PLL36XX_MDIV_MASK	(0x1FF)
@@ -168,6 +170,8 @@ static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll35xx_clk_min_ops = {
 #define PLL36XX_MDIV_SHIFT	(16)
 #define PLL36XX_PDIV_SHIFT	(8)
 #define PLL36XX_SDIV_SHIFT	(0)
+#define PLL36XX_KDIV_SHIFT	(0)
+#define PLL36XX_LOCK_STAT_SHIFT	(29)
 
 static unsigned long samsung_pll36xx_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 				unsigned long parent_rate)
@@ -190,8 +194,78 @@ static unsigned long samsung_pll36xx_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
 	return (unsigned long)fvco;
 }
 
+static inline bool samsung_pll36xx_mpk_change(
+	const struct samsung_pll_rate_table *rate, u32 pll_con0, u32 pll_con1)
+{
+	u32 old_mdiv, old_pdiv, old_kdiv;
+
+	old_mdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL36XX_MDIV_SHIFT) & PLL36XX_MDIV_MASK;
+	old_pdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL36XX_PDIV_SHIFT) & PLL36XX_PDIV_MASK;
+	old_kdiv = (pll_con1 >> PLL36XX_KDIV_SHIFT) & PLL36XX_KDIV_MASK;
+
+	return (rate->mdiv != old_mdiv || rate->pdiv != old_pdiv ||
+		rate->kdiv != old_kdiv);
+}
+
+static int samsung_pll36xx_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long drate,
+					unsigned long parent_rate)
+{
+	struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw);
+	u32 tmp, pll_con0, pll_con1;
+	const struct samsung_pll_rate_table *rate;
+
+	rate = samsung_get_pll_settings(pll, drate);
+	if (!rate) {
+		pr_err("%s: Invalid rate : %lu for pll clk %s\n", __func__,
+			drate, __clk_get_name(hw->clk));
+		return -EINVAL;
+	}
+
+	pll_con0 = __raw_readl(pll->con_reg);
+	pll_con1 = __raw_readl(pll->con_reg + 4);
+
+	if (!(samsung_pll36xx_mpk_change(rate, pll_con0, pll_con1))) {
+		/* If only s change, change just s value only*/
+		pll_con0 &= ~(PLL36XX_SDIV_MASK << PLL36XX_SDIV_SHIFT);
+		pll_con0 |= (rate->sdiv << PLL36XX_SDIV_SHIFT);
+		__raw_writel(pll_con0, pll->con_reg);
+
+		return 0;
+	}
+
+	/* Set PLL lock time. */
+	__raw_writel(rate->pdiv * PLL36XX_LOCK_FACTOR, pll->lock_reg);
+
+	 /* Change PLL PMS values */
+	pll_con0 &= ~((PLL36XX_MDIV_MASK << PLL36XX_MDIV_SHIFT) |
+			(PLL36XX_PDIV_MASK << PLL36XX_PDIV_SHIFT) |
+			(PLL36XX_SDIV_MASK << PLL36XX_SDIV_SHIFT));
+	pll_con0 |= (rate->mdiv << PLL36XX_MDIV_SHIFT) |
+			(rate->pdiv << PLL36XX_PDIV_SHIFT) |
+			(rate->sdiv << PLL36XX_SDIV_SHIFT);
+	__raw_writel(pll_con0, pll->con_reg);
+
+	pll_con1 &= ~(PLL36XX_KDIV_MASK << PLL36XX_KDIV_SHIFT);
+	pll_con1 |= rate->kdiv << PLL36XX_KDIV_SHIFT;
+	__raw_writel(pll_con1, pll->con_reg + 4);
+
+	/* wait_lock_time */
+	do {
+		cpu_relax();
+		tmp = __raw_readl(pll->con_reg);
+	} while (!(tmp & (1 << PLL36XX_LOCK_STAT_SHIFT)));
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll36xx_clk_ops = {
 	.recalc_rate = samsung_pll36xx_recalc_rate,
+	.set_rate = samsung_pll36xx_set_rate,
+	.round_rate = samsung_pll_round_rate,
+};
+
+static const struct clk_ops samsung_pll36xx_clk_min_ops = {
+	.recalc_rate = samsung_pll36xx_recalc_rate,
 };
 
 /*
@@ -492,7 +566,10 @@ static void __init _samsung_clk_register_pll(struct samsung_pll_clock *pll_clk,
 	/* clk_ops for 36xx and 2650 are similar */
 	case pll_36xx:
 	case pll_2650:
-		init.ops = &samsung_pll36xx_clk_ops;
+		if (!pll->rate_table)
+			init.ops = &samsung_pll36xx_clk_min_ops;
+		else
+			init.ops = &samsung_pll36xx_clk_ops;
 		break;
 	default:
 		pr_warn("%s: Unknown pll type for pll clk %s\n",
-- 
1.7.0.4

[PATCH v7 10/11] clk: samsung: Reorder MUX registration for mout_vpllsrc

[Yadwinder Singh Brar]

From: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@linaro.org>

While trying to get rate of "mout_vpllsrc" MUX (parent) for registering the
"fout_vpll" (child), we found get rate was failing.

So this patch moves the mout_vpllsrc MUX out of the existing common list
and registers the mout_vpllsrc MUX before the PLL registrations.

Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
index 623ae44..492d119 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
@@ -233,6 +233,10 @@ static struct samsung_fixed_factor_clock exynos5250_fixed_factor_clks[] __initda
 	FFACTOR(none, "fout_bplldiv2", "fout_bpll", 1, 2, 0),
 };
 
+static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5250_pll_pmux_clks[] __initdata = {
+	MUX(none, "mout_vpllsrc", mout_vpllsrc_p, SRC_TOP2, 0, 1),
+};
+
 static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5250_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
 	MUX(none, "mout_apll", mout_apll_p, SRC_CPU, 0, 1),
 	MUX(none, "mout_cpu", mout_cpu_p, SRC_CPU, 16, 1),
@@ -240,7 +244,6 @@ static struct samsung_mux_clock exynos5250_mux_clks[] __initdata = {
 	MUX(none, "sclk_mpll", mout_mpll_p, SRC_CORE1, 8, 1),
 	MUX(none, "mout_bpll_fout", mout_bpll_fout_p, PLL_DIV2_SEL, 0, 1),
 	MUX(none, "sclk_bpll", mout_bpll_p, SRC_CDREX, 0, 1),
-	MUX(none, "mout_vpllsrc", mout_vpllsrc_p, SRC_TOP2, 0, 1),
 	MUX(none, "sclk_vpll", mout_vpll_p, SRC_TOP2, 16, 1),
 	MUX(none, "sclk_epll", mout_epll_p, SRC_TOP2, 12, 1),
 	MUX(none, "sclk_cpll", mout_cpll_p, SRC_TOP2, 8, 1),
@@ -536,6 +539,8 @@ static void __init exynos5250_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
 	samsung_clk_of_register_fixed_ext(exynos5250_fixed_rate_ext_clks,
 			ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_fixed_rate_ext_clks),
 			ext_clk_match);
+	samsung_clk_register_mux(exynos5250_pll_pmux_clks,
+				ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_pll_pmux_clks));
 	samsung_clk_register_pll(exynos5250_plls, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_plls),
 					reg_base);
 	samsung_clk_register_fixed_rate(exynos5250_fixed_rate_clks,
-- 
1.7.0.4

[PATCH v7 11/11] clk: samsung: Add EPLL and VPLL freq table for exynos5250 SoC

[Yadwinder Singh Brar]

From: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@linaro.org>

Adds the EPLL and VPLL freq table for exynos5250 SoC.

Signed-off-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar@samsung.com>
---
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c |   38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h            |    2 +
 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
index 492d119..2aabecb 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c
@@ -498,6 +498,29 @@ static struct samsung_gate_clock exynos5250_gate_clks[] __initdata = {
 	GATE(g3d, "g3d", "aclk_400_g3d", GATE_IP_G3D, 0, 0, 0),
 };
 
+static __initdata struct samsung_pll_rate_table vpll_24mhz_tbl[] = {
+	/* sorted in descending order */
+	/* PLL_36XX_RATE(rate, m, p, s, k) */
+	PLL_36XX_RATE(266000000, 266, 3, 3, 0),
+	/* Not in UM, but need for eDP on snow */
+	PLL_36XX_RATE(70500000, 94, 2, 4, 0),
+	{ },
+};
+
+static __initdata struct samsung_pll_rate_table epll_24mhz_tbl[] = {
+	/* sorted in descending order */
+	/* PLL_36XX_RATE(rate, m, p, s, k) */
+	PLL_36XX_RATE(192000000, 64, 2, 2, 0),
+	PLL_36XX_RATE(180633600, 90, 3, 2, 20762),
+	PLL_36XX_RATE(180000000, 90, 3, 2, 0),
+	PLL_36XX_RATE(73728000, 98, 2, 4, 19923),
+	PLL_36XX_RATE(67737600, 90, 2, 4, 20762),
+	PLL_36XX_RATE(49152000, 98, 3, 4, 19923),
+	PLL_36XX_RATE(45158400, 90, 3, 4, 20762),
+	PLL_36XX_RATE(32768000, 131, 3, 5, 4719),
+	{ },
+};
+
 struct __initdata samsung_pll_clock exynos5250_plls[nr_plls] = {
 	[apll] = PLL_A(pll_35xx, fout_apll, "fout_apll", "fin_pll", APLL_LOCK,
 		APLL_CON0, "fout_apll", NULL),
@@ -524,6 +547,8 @@ static __initdata struct of_device_id ext_clk_match[] = {
 static void __init exynos5250_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
 {
 	void __iomem *reg_base;
+	struct clk *vpllsrc;
+	unsigned long fin_pll_rate, mout_vpllsrc_rate = 0;
 
 	if (np) {
 		reg_base = of_iomap(np, 0);
@@ -541,6 +566,19 @@ static void __init exynos5250_clk_init(struct device_node *np)
 			ext_clk_match);
 	samsung_clk_register_mux(exynos5250_pll_pmux_clks,
 				ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_pll_pmux_clks));
+
+	fin_pll_rate = _get_rate("fin_pll");
+
+	if (fin_pll_rate == 24 * MHZ)
+		exynos5250_plls[epll].rate_table = epll_24mhz_tbl;
+
+	vpllsrc = __clk_lookup("mout_vpllsrc");
+	if (vpllsrc)
+		mout_vpllsrc_rate = clk_get_rate(vpllsrc);
+
+	if (mout_vpllsrc_rate == 24 * MHZ)
+		exynos5250_plls[vpll].rate_table =  vpll_24mhz_tbl;
+
 	samsung_clk_register_pll(exynos5250_plls, ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5250_plls),
 					reg_base);
 	samsung_clk_register_fixed_rate(exynos5250_fixed_rate_clks,
diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
index 4a003d7..d459ef7 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h
@@ -40,6 +40,8 @@ struct samsung_clock_alias {
 		.alias		= a,				\
 	}
 
+#define MHZ (1000 * 1000)
+
 /**
  * struct samsung_fixed_rate_clock: information about fixed-rate clock
  * @id: platform specific id of the clock.
-- 
1.7.0.4

[PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs

[Tomasz Figa]

Hi Yadwinder, Vikas,

On Tuesday 11 of June 2013 15:01:05 Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote:
> This patch series does the following:
> 
>  1) Unifies the clk strutures  and registration function used for PLL35xx
> & PLL36xx, to factor out possible common code.
> 
>  2) Defines a common rate_table which will contain recommended p, m, s
> and k values for supported rates that needs to be changed for changing
> corresponding PLL's rate
> 
>  3) Adds set_rate() and round_rate() clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx
> 
> changes since v6:
> 	- Splited the patch adding samsung_clk_register_pll() into definition
> 	addition, SoC specific migration and cleanup patches.
> 	- Addressed some NIT comments.

This version looks good to me. Thanks for your work on improving this 
series again!

Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Tomasz

> changes since v5:
> 	- Corrected to use rate table as specified in UM for exynos5250 epll.
> 	- Took care of exynos5420 as well, as new exynos5420 clk driver came in
> 	while rebasing on latest Kgene's for-next.
> 
> 	Since we spilted 1st patch into 2 different patches,
> 	can we expect "reviewed-by" again for the same?
> 
> changes since v4:
> 	- Defined common samsung samsung_clk_register_pll() to register a list
> 	of PLL and used a struct samsung_pll_clock for passing intialisation
> 	data instead of passing as arguments. Now passing LOCK as well as CON0
> 	offset as intialisation data.
> 	- Calculated length of rate table while registering PLL instead of
> 	getting it as intialisation data.
> 
> changes since v3:
> 	- Used __clk_lookup() instead of adding alias for mout_vpllsrc
> 	- Added check for changing only M value in samsung_pll36xx_set_rate()
> 	- Modified samsung_pll35xx_mp_change() & samsung_pll35xx_set_rate()
> 	to improve readabilty.
> 	- Made the input rate_table as __init_data which is to be provided 
while
> registering PLL and made a copy of that table while registering, so that
> if multiple tables are their, they can be freed after getting the P, M,
> S, K setting values from required one.
> 
> changes since v2:
> 	- Added new patch to reorder the MUX registration for mout_vpllsrc MUX
> 	before the PLL registrations. And to add the alias for the mout_vpllsrc
> MUX. - Added a check to confirm parent rate while registrating the PLL
> rate tables.
> 
> changes since v1:
> 	- removed sorting and bsearch
> 	- modified the definition of struct "samsung_pll_rate_table"
> 	- added generic round_rate()
> 	- rectified the ops assignment for "rate table passed as NULL
> 
> Is rebased on branch kgene's "for-next"
> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git/log/
> ?h=for-next
> 
> Vikas Sajjan (3):
>   clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL36xx
>   clk: samsung: Reorder MUX registration for mout_vpllsrc
>   clk: samsung: Add EPLL and VPLL freq table for exynos5250 SoC
> 
> Yadwinder Singh Brar (8):
>   clk: samsung: Introduce a common samsung_clk_pll struct
>   clk: samsung: Define a common samsung_clk_register_pll()
>   clk: samsung: Migrate exynos5250 to use common
>     samsung_clk_register_pll()
>   clk: samsung: Migrate exynos4 to use common
>     samsung_clk_register_pll()
>   clk: samsung: Migrate exynos5420 to use common
>     samsung_clk_register_pll()
>   clk: samsung: Remove unused pll registeration code for pll35xx and
>     pll36xx
>   clk: samsung: Add support to register rate_table for samsung plls
>   clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL35xx
> 
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c    |   40 +++--
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c |  101 +++++++++--
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c |   86 ++++++---
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c        |  339
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h       
> |   38 ++++-
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h            |   53 ++++++
>  6 files changed, 519 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)

[PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs

[Yadwinder Singh Brar]

Hi Tomasz,

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hi Yadwinder, Vikas,
>
> On Tuesday 11 of June 2013 15:01:05 Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote:
>> This patch series does the following:
>>
>>  1) Unifies the clk strutures  and registration function used for PLL35xx
>> & PLL36xx, to factor out possible common code.
>>
>>  2) Defines a common rate_table which will contain recommended p, m, s
>> and k values for supported rates that needs to be changed for changing
>> corresponding PLL's rate
>>
>>  3) Adds set_rate() and round_rate() clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx
>>
>> changes since v6:
>>       - Splited the patch adding samsung_clk_register_pll() into definition
>>       addition, SoC specific migration and cleanup patches.
>>       - Addressed some NIT comments.
>
> This version looks good to me. Thanks for your work on improving this
> series again!
>
> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
>

Thanks for helping to improve this series.

Thanks,
Yadwinder

> Best regards,
> Tomasz
>
>> changes since v5:
>>       - Corrected to use rate table as specified in UM for exynos5250 epll.
>>       - Took care of exynos5420 as well, as new exynos5420 clk driver came in
>>       while rebasing on latest Kgene's for-next.
>>
>>       Since we spilted 1st patch into 2 different patches,
>>       can we expect "reviewed-by" again for the same?
>>
>> changes since v4:
>>       - Defined common samsung samsung_clk_register_pll() to register a list
>>       of PLL and used a struct samsung_pll_clock for passing intialisation
>>       data instead of passing as arguments. Now passing LOCK as well as CON0
>>       offset as intialisation data.
>>       - Calculated length of rate table while registering PLL instead of
>>       getting it as intialisation data.
>>
>> changes since v3:
>>       - Used __clk_lookup() instead of adding alias for mout_vpllsrc
>>       - Added check for changing only M value in samsung_pll36xx_set_rate()
>>       - Modified samsung_pll35xx_mp_change() & samsung_pll35xx_set_rate()
>>       to improve readabilty.
>>       - Made the input rate_table as __init_data which is to be provided
> while
>> registering PLL and made a copy of that table while registering, so that
>> if multiple tables are their, they can be freed after getting the P, M,
>> S, K setting values from required one.
>>
>> changes since v2:
>>       - Added new patch to reorder the MUX registration for mout_vpllsrc MUX
>>       before the PLL registrations. And to add the alias for the mout_vpllsrc
>> MUX. - Added a check to confirm parent rate while registrating the PLL
>> rate tables.
>>
>> changes since v1:
>>       - removed sorting and bsearch
>>       - modified the definition of struct "samsung_pll_rate_table"
>>       - added generic round_rate()
>>       - rectified the ops assignment for "rate table passed as NULL
>>
>> Is rebased on branch kgene's "for-next"
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git/log/
>> ?h=for-next
>>
>> Vikas Sajjan (3):
>>   clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL36xx
>>   clk: samsung: Reorder MUX registration for mout_vpllsrc
>>   clk: samsung: Add EPLL and VPLL freq table for exynos5250 SoC
>>
>> Yadwinder Singh Brar (8):
>>   clk: samsung: Introduce a common samsung_clk_pll struct
>>   clk: samsung: Define a common samsung_clk_register_pll()
>>   clk: samsung: Migrate exynos5250 to use common
>>     samsung_clk_register_pll()
>>   clk: samsung: Migrate exynos4 to use common
>>     samsung_clk_register_pll()
>>   clk: samsung: Migrate exynos5420 to use common
>>     samsung_clk_register_pll()
>>   clk: samsung: Remove unused pll registeration code for pll35xx and
>>     pll36xx
>>   clk: samsung: Add support to register rate_table for samsung plls
>>   clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL35xx
>>
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c    |   40 +++--
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c |  101 +++++++++--
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c |   86 ++++++---
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c        |  339
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
>> |   38 ++++-
>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h            |   53 ++++++
>>  6 files changed, 519 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs

[Vikas Sajjan]

Hi Mr. Kim,

On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Yadwinder Singh Brar
<yadi.brar01@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Tomasz,
>
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> wrote:
>> Hi Yadwinder, Vikas,
>>
>> On Tuesday 11 of June 2013 15:01:05 Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote:
>>> This patch series does the following:
>>>
>>>  1) Unifies the clk strutures  and registration function used for PLL35xx
>>> & PLL36xx, to factor out possible common code.
>>>
>>>  2) Defines a common rate_table which will contain recommended p, m, s
>>> and k values for supported rates that needs to be changed for changing
>>> corresponding PLL's rate
>>>
>>>  3) Adds set_rate() and round_rate() clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx
>>>
>>> changes since v6:
>>>       - Splited the patch adding samsung_clk_register_pll() into definition
>>>       addition, SoC specific migration and cleanup patches.
>>>       - Addressed some NIT comments.
>>
>> This version looks good to me. Thanks for your work on improving this
>> series again!
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
>>


Can you apply this series..


>
> Thanks for helping to improve this series.
>
> Thanks,
> Yadwinder
>
>> Best regards,
>> Tomasz
>>
>>> changes since v5:
>>>       - Corrected to use rate table as specified in UM for exynos5250 epll.
>>>       - Took care of exynos5420 as well, as new exynos5420 clk driver came in
>>>       while rebasing on latest Kgene's for-next.
>>>
>>>       Since we spilted 1st patch into 2 different patches,
>>>       can we expect "reviewed-by" again for the same?
>>>
>>> changes since v4:
>>>       - Defined common samsung samsung_clk_register_pll() to register a list
>>>       of PLL and used a struct samsung_pll_clock for passing intialisation
>>>       data instead of passing as arguments. Now passing LOCK as well as CON0
>>>       offset as intialisation data.
>>>       - Calculated length of rate table while registering PLL instead of
>>>       getting it as intialisation data.
>>>
>>> changes since v3:
>>>       - Used __clk_lookup() instead of adding alias for mout_vpllsrc
>>>       - Added check for changing only M value in samsung_pll36xx_set_rate()
>>>       - Modified samsung_pll35xx_mp_change() & samsung_pll35xx_set_rate()
>>>       to improve readabilty.
>>>       - Made the input rate_table as __init_data which is to be provided
>> while
>>> registering PLL and made a copy of that table while registering, so that
>>> if multiple tables are their, they can be freed after getting the P, M,
>>> S, K setting values from required one.
>>>
>>> changes since v2:
>>>       - Added new patch to reorder the MUX registration for mout_vpllsrc MUX
>>>       before the PLL registrations. And to add the alias for the mout_vpllsrc
>>> MUX. - Added a check to confirm parent rate while registrating the PLL
>>> rate tables.
>>>
>>> changes since v1:
>>>       - removed sorting and bsearch
>>>       - modified the definition of struct "samsung_pll_rate_table"
>>>       - added generic round_rate()
>>>       - rectified the ops assignment for "rate table passed as NULL
>>>
>>> Is rebased on branch kgene's "for-next"
>>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git/log/
>>> ?h=for-next
>>>
>>> Vikas Sajjan (3):
>>>   clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL36xx
>>>   clk: samsung: Reorder MUX registration for mout_vpllsrc
>>>   clk: samsung: Add EPLL and VPLL freq table for exynos5250 SoC
>>>
>>> Yadwinder Singh Brar (8):
>>>   clk: samsung: Introduce a common samsung_clk_pll struct
>>>   clk: samsung: Define a common samsung_clk_register_pll()
>>>   clk: samsung: Migrate exynos5250 to use common
>>>     samsung_clk_register_pll()
>>>   clk: samsung: Migrate exynos4 to use common
>>>     samsung_clk_register_pll()
>>>   clk: samsung: Migrate exynos5420 to use common
>>>     samsung_clk_register_pll()
>>>   clk: samsung: Remove unused pll registeration code for pll35xx and
>>>     pll36xx
>>>   clk: samsung: Add support to register rate_table for samsung plls
>>>   clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL35xx
>>>
>>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c    |   40 +++--
>>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c |  101 +++++++++--
>>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c |   86 ++++++---
>>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c        |  339
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
>>> |   38 ++++-
>>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h            |   53 ++++++
>>>  6 files changed, 519 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs

[Tomasz Figa]

On Friday 21 of June 2013 10:18:01 Vikas Sajjan wrote:
> Hi Mr. Kim,
> 
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Yadwinder Singh Brar
> 
> <yadi.brar01@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Tomasz,
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> 
wrote:
> >> Hi Yadwinder, Vikas,
> >> 
> >> On Tuesday 11 of June 2013 15:01:05 Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote:
> >>> This patch series does the following:
> >>>  1) Unifies the clk strutures  and registration function used for
> >>>  PLL35xx>>> 
> >>> & PLL36xx, to factor out possible common code.
> >>> 
> >>>  2) Defines a common rate_table which will contain recommended p, m,
> >>>  s
> >>> 
> >>> and k values for supported rates that needs to be changed for
> >>> changing
> >>> corresponding PLL's rate
> >>> 
> >>>  3) Adds set_rate() and round_rate() clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx
> >>> 
> >>> changes since v6:
> >>>       - Splited the patch adding samsung_clk_register_pll() into
> >>>       definition
> >>>       addition, SoC specific migration and cleanup patches.
> >>>       - Addressed some NIT comments.
> >> 
> >> This version looks good to me. Thanks for your work on improving this
> >> series again!
> >> 
> >> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> 
> Can you apply this series..

I think we need at least Mike's (clk subsystem maintainer) ACK here.

Mike, do you have any objections?

Best regards,
Tomasz

> > Thanks for helping to improve this series.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Yadwinder
> > 
> >> Best regards,
> >> Tomasz
> >> 
> >>> changes since v5:
> >>>       - Corrected to use rate table as specified in UM for
> >>>       exynos5250 epll.
> >>>       - Took care of exynos5420 as well, as new exynos5420 clk
> >>>       driver came in
> >>>       while rebasing on latest Kgene's for-next.
> >>>       
> >>>       Since we spilted 1st patch into 2 different patches,
> >>>       can we expect "reviewed-by" again for the same?
> >>> 
> >>> changes since v4:
> >>>       - Defined common samsung samsung_clk_register_pll() to
> >>>       register a list
> >>>       of PLL and used a struct samsung_pll_clock for passing
> >>>       intialisation
> >>>       data instead of passing as arguments. Now passing LOCK as well
> >>>       as CON0
> >>>       offset as intialisation data.
> >>>       - Calculated length of rate table while registering PLL
> >>>       instead of
> >>>       getting it as intialisation data.
> >>> 
> >>> changes since v3:
> >>>       - Used __clk_lookup() instead of adding alias for mout_vpllsrc
> >>>       - Added check for changing only M value in
> >>>       samsung_pll36xx_set_rate()
> >>>       - Modified samsung_pll35xx_mp_change() &
> >>>       samsung_pll35xx_set_rate()
> >>>       to improve readabilty.
> >>>       - Made the input rate_table as __init_data which is to be
> >>>       provided
> >> 
> >> while
> >> 
> >>> registering PLL and made a copy of that table while registering, so
> >>> that if multiple tables are their, they can be freed after getting
> >>> the P, M, S, K setting values from required one.
> >>> 
> >>> changes since v2:
> >>>       - Added new patch to reorder the MUX registration for
> >>>       mout_vpllsrc MUX
> >>>       before the PLL registrations. And to add the alias for the
> >>>       mout_vpllsrc
> >>> 
> >>> MUX. - Added a check to confirm parent rate while registrating the
> >>> PLL
> >>> rate tables.
> >>> 
> >>> changes since v1:
> >>>       - removed sorting and bsearch
> >>>       - modified the definition of struct "samsung_pll_rate_table"
> >>>       - added generic round_rate()
> >>>       - rectified the ops assignment for "rate table passed as NULL
> >>> 
> >>> Is rebased on branch kgene's "for-next"
> >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
> >>> /log/ ?h=for-next
> >>> 
> >>> Vikas Sajjan (3):
> >>>   clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL36xx
> >>>   clk: samsung: Reorder MUX registration for mout_vpllsrc
> >>>   clk: samsung: Add EPLL and VPLL freq table for exynos5250 SoC
> >>> 
> >>> Yadwinder Singh Brar (8):
> >>>   clk: samsung: Introduce a common samsung_clk_pll struct
> >>>   clk: samsung: Define a common samsung_clk_register_pll()
> >>>   clk: samsung: Migrate exynos5250 to use common
> >>>   
> >>>     samsung_clk_register_pll()
> >>>   
> >>>   clk: samsung: Migrate exynos4 to use common
> >>>   
> >>>     samsung_clk_register_pll()
> >>>   
> >>>   clk: samsung: Migrate exynos5420 to use common
> >>>   
> >>>     samsung_clk_register_pll()
> >>>   
> >>>   clk: samsung: Remove unused pll registeration code for pll35xx and
> >>>   
> >>>     pll36xx
> >>>   
> >>>   clk: samsung: Add support to register rate_table for samsung plls
> >>>   clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL35xx
> >>>  
> >>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c    |   40 +++--
> >>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c |  101 +++++++++--
> >>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c |   86 ++++++---
> >>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c        |  339
> >>> 
> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
> >>> 
> >>> |   38 ++++-
> >>>  
> >>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h            |   53 ++++++
> >>>  6 files changed, 519 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> --
> >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> >> linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to
> >> majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to
> > majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs

[Mike Turquette]

Quoting Tomasz Figa (2013-06-21 00:09:27)
> On Friday 21 of June 2013 10:18:01 Vikas Sajjan wrote:
> > Hi Mr. Kim,
> > 
> > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Yadwinder Singh Brar
> > 
> > <yadi.brar01@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Tomasz,
> > > 
> > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:30 PM, Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com> 
> wrote:
> > >> Hi Yadwinder, Vikas,
> > >> 
> > >> On Tuesday 11 of June 2013 15:01:05 Yadwinder Singh Brar wrote:
> > >>> This patch series does the following:
> > >>>  1) Unifies the clk strutures  and registration function used for
> > >>>  PLL35xx>>> 
> > >>> & PLL36xx, to factor out possible common code.
> > >>> 
> > >>>  2) Defines a common rate_table which will contain recommended p, m,
> > >>>  s
> > >>> 
> > >>> and k values for supported rates that needs to be changed for
> > >>> changing
> > >>> corresponding PLL's rate
> > >>> 
> > >>>  3) Adds set_rate() and round_rate() clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx
> > >>> 
> > >>> changes since v6:
> > >>>       - Splited the patch adding samsung_clk_register_pll() into
> > >>>       definition
> > >>>       addition, SoC specific migration and cleanup patches.
> > >>>       - Addressed some NIT comments.
> > >> 
> > >> This version looks good to me. Thanks for your work on improving this
> > >> series again!
> > >> 
> > >> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>
> > 
> > Can you apply this series..
> 
> I think we need at least Mike's (clk subsystem maintainer) ACK here.
> 
> Mike, do you have any objections?

Acked-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>

Or I can take this through the clk tree. Either way is fine.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> Best regards,
> Tomasz
> 
> > > Thanks for helping to improve this series.
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Yadwinder
> > > 
> > >> Best regards,
> > >> Tomasz
> > >> 
> > >>> changes since v5:
> > >>>       - Corrected to use rate table as specified in UM for
> > >>>       exynos5250 epll.
> > >>>       - Took care of exynos5420 as well, as new exynos5420 clk
> > >>>       driver came in
> > >>>       while rebasing on latest Kgene's for-next.
> > >>>       
> > >>>       Since we spilted 1st patch into 2 different patches,
> > >>>       can we expect "reviewed-by" again for the same?
> > >>> 
> > >>> changes since v4:
> > >>>       - Defined common samsung samsung_clk_register_pll() to
> > >>>       register a list
> > >>>       of PLL and used a struct samsung_pll_clock for passing
> > >>>       intialisation
> > >>>       data instead of passing as arguments. Now passing LOCK as well
> > >>>       as CON0
> > >>>       offset as intialisation data.
> > >>>       - Calculated length of rate table while registering PLL
> > >>>       instead of
> > >>>       getting it as intialisation data.
> > >>> 
> > >>> changes since v3:
> > >>>       - Used __clk_lookup() instead of adding alias for mout_vpllsrc
> > >>>       - Added check for changing only M value in
> > >>>       samsung_pll36xx_set_rate()
> > >>>       - Modified samsung_pll35xx_mp_change() &
> > >>>       samsung_pll35xx_set_rate()
> > >>>       to improve readabilty.
> > >>>       - Made the input rate_table as __init_data which is to be
> > >>>       provided
> > >> 
> > >> while
> > >> 
> > >>> registering PLL and made a copy of that table while registering, so
> > >>> that if multiple tables are their, they can be freed after getting
> > >>> the P, M, S, K setting values from required one.
> > >>> 
> > >>> changes since v2:
> > >>>       - Added new patch to reorder the MUX registration for
> > >>>       mout_vpllsrc MUX
> > >>>       before the PLL registrations. And to add the alias for the
> > >>>       mout_vpllsrc
> > >>> 
> > >>> MUX. - Added a check to confirm parent rate while registrating the
> > >>> PLL
> > >>> rate tables.
> > >>> 
> > >>> changes since v1:
> > >>>       - removed sorting and bsearch
> > >>>       - modified the definition of struct "samsung_pll_rate_table"
> > >>>       - added generic round_rate()
> > >>>       - rectified the ops assignment for "rate table passed as NULL
> > >>> 
> > >>> Is rebased on branch kgene's "for-next"
> > >>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/kgene/linux-samsung.git
> > >>> /log/ ?h=for-next
> > >>> 
> > >>> Vikas Sajjan (3):
> > >>>   clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL36xx
> > >>>   clk: samsung: Reorder MUX registration for mout_vpllsrc
> > >>>   clk: samsung: Add EPLL and VPLL freq table for exynos5250 SoC
> > >>> 
> > >>> Yadwinder Singh Brar (8):
> > >>>   clk: samsung: Introduce a common samsung_clk_pll struct
> > >>>   clk: samsung: Define a common samsung_clk_register_pll()
> > >>>   clk: samsung: Migrate exynos5250 to use common
> > >>>   
> > >>>     samsung_clk_register_pll()
> > >>>   
> > >>>   clk: samsung: Migrate exynos4 to use common
> > >>>   
> > >>>     samsung_clk_register_pll()
> > >>>   
> > >>>   clk: samsung: Migrate exynos5420 to use common
> > >>>   
> > >>>     samsung_clk_register_pll()
> > >>>   
> > >>>   clk: samsung: Remove unused pll registeration code for pll35xx and
> > >>>   
> > >>>     pll36xx
> > >>>   
> > >>>   clk: samsung: Add support to register rate_table for samsung plls
> > >>>   clk: samsung: Add set_rate() clk_ops for PLL35xx
> > >>>  
> > >>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c    |   40 +++--
> > >>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c |  101 +++++++++--
> > >>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c |   86 ++++++---
> > >>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c        |  339
> > >>> 
> > >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------- drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.h
> > >>> 
> > >>> |   38 ++++-
> > >>>  
> > >>>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk.h            |   53 ++++++
> > >>>  6 files changed, 519 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-)
> > >> 
> > >> --
> > >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > >> linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to
> > >> majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> > >> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > 
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > > linux-samsung-soc" in the body of a message to
> > > majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> > > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs

[Kukjin Kim]

On 06/22/13 01:31, Mike Turquette wrote:
>
> Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
>
> Or I can take this through the clk tree. Either way is fine.
>
Mike, please go ahead taking this series into the clk tree for 3.11.

Thanks,
- Kukjin

[PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs

[Mike Turquette]

Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-06-24 08:02:39)
> On 06/22/13 01:31, Mike Turquette wrote:
> >
> > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
> >
> > Or I can take this through the clk tree. Either way is fine.
> >
> Mike, please go ahead taking this series into the clk tree for 3.11.

Actually it might be better for you to take it. Patch #5 relies on
drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c which only exists in the samsung
tree.  It was introduced by commit 1609027f, "clk: exynos5420: register
clocks using common clock framework".

And these patches need to be applied with some fuzz to the clk tree due
to other changes which are not in my tree and only present in yours.

The best two options are either for you to take this series or it can be
rebased on top of clk-next, after which I'll apply it.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> Thanks,
> - Kukjin

[PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs

[Kukjin Kim]

Mike Turquette wrote:
> 
> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-06-24 08:02:39)
> > On 06/22/13 01:31, Mike Turquette wrote:
> > >
> > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
> > >
> > > Or I can take this through the clk tree. Either way is fine.
> > >
> > Mike, please go ahead taking this series into the clk tree for 3.11.
> 
> Actually it might be better for you to take it. Patch #5 relies on
> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c which only exists in the samsung
> tree.  It was introduced by commit 1609027f, "clk: exynos5420: register
> clocks using common clock framework".
> 
Yes, you're right. It depends on soc-exynos5420 stuff in samsung tree.

> And these patches need to be applied with some fuzz to the clk tree due
> to other changes which are not in my tree and only present in yours.
> 
> The best two options are either for you to take this series or it can be
> rebased on top of clk-next, after which I'll apply it.
> 
Let me try to send this series via samsung tree for v3.11 but I'm not sure because it's a little bit late for arm-soc tree.

Thanks for your ack, just note I will send to arm-soc tonight in my time.

- Kukjin

[PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs

[Yadwinder Singh Brar]

Hi Kukjin / Mike,

On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> Mike Turquette wrote:
>>
>> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-06-24 08:02:39)
>> > On 06/22/13 01:31, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
>> > >
>> > > Or I can take this through the clk tree. Either way is fine.
>> > >
>> > Mike, please go ahead taking this series into the clk tree for 3.11.
>>
>> Actually it might be better for you to take it. Patch #5 relies on
>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c which only exists in the samsung
>> tree.  It was introduced by commit 1609027f, "clk: exynos5420: register
>> clocks using common clock framework".
>>
> Yes, you're right. It depends on soc-exynos5420 stuff in samsung tree.
>
>> And these patches need to be applied with some fuzz to the clk tree due
>> to other changes which are not in my tree and only present in yours.
>>
>> The best two options are either for you to take this series or it can be
>> rebased on top of clk-next, after which I'll apply it.
>>
> Let me try to send this series via samsung tree for v3.11 but I'm not sure because it's a little bit late for arm-soc tree.
>
> Thanks for your ack, just note I will send to arm-soc tonight in my time.
>

Can we get this series merge now in any of trees.
Please let me if its required to rebase it.

Regards,
Yadwinder

[PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs

[Vikas Sajjan]

Hi Kukjin / Mike,

Can you apply this series

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Yadwinder Singh Brar
<yadi.brar01@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Kukjin / Mike,
>
> On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
>> Mike Turquette wrote:
>>>
>>> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-06-24 08:02:39)
>>> > On 06/22/13 01:31, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
>>> > >
>>> > > Or I can take this through the clk tree. Either way is fine.
>>> > >
>>> > Mike, please go ahead taking this series into the clk tree for 3.11.
>>>
>>> Actually it might be better for you to take it. Patch #5 relies on
>>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c which only exists in the samsung
>>> tree.  It was introduced by commit 1609027f, "clk: exynos5420: register
>>> clocks using common clock framework".
>>>
>> Yes, you're right. It depends on soc-exynos5420 stuff in samsung tree.
>>
>>> And these patches need to be applied with some fuzz to the clk tree due
>>> to other changes which are not in my tree and only present in yours.
>>>
>>> The best two options are either for you to take this series or it can be
>>> rebased on top of clk-next, after which I'll apply it.
>>>
>> Let me try to send this series via samsung tree for v3.11 but I'm not sure because it's a little bit late for arm-soc tree.
>>
>> Thanks for your ack, just note I will send to arm-soc tonight in my time.
>>
>
> Can we get this series merge now in any of trees.
> Please let me if its required to rebase it.
>
> Regards,
> Yadwinder

[PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs

[Mike Turquette]

Quoting Vikas Sajjan (2013-07-21 23:15:27)
> Hi Kukjin / Mike,
> 
> Can you apply this series

Let me apply this to see if the dependencies are taken care of now. If
so I'll just take it through the clk tree.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Yadwinder Singh Brar
> <yadi.brar01@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Kukjin / Mike,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> >> Mike Turquette wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-06-24 08:02:39)
> >>> > On 06/22/13 01:31, Mike Turquette wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Or I can take this through the clk tree. Either way is fine.
> >>> > >
> >>> > Mike, please go ahead taking this series into the clk tree for 3.11.
> >>>
> >>> Actually it might be better for you to take it. Patch #5 relies on
> >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c which only exists in the samsung
> >>> tree.  It was introduced by commit 1609027f, "clk: exynos5420: register
> >>> clocks using common clock framework".
> >>>
> >> Yes, you're right. It depends on soc-exynos5420 stuff in samsung tree.
> >>
> >>> And these patches need to be applied with some fuzz to the clk tree due
> >>> to other changes which are not in my tree and only present in yours.
> >>>
> >>> The best two options are either for you to take this series or it can be
> >>> rebased on top of clk-next, after which I'll apply it.
> >>>
> >> Let me try to send this series via samsung tree for v3.11 but I'm not sure because it's a little bit late for arm-soc tree.
> >>
> >> Thanks for your ack, just note I will send to arm-soc tonight in my time.
> >>
> >
> > Can we get this series merge now in any of trees.
> > Please let me if its required to rebase it.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Yadwinder

[PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs

[Vikas Sajjan]

Hi Mike,

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> wrote:
> Quoting Vikas Sajjan (2013-07-21 23:15:27)
>> Hi Kukjin / Mike,
>>
>> Can you apply this series
>
> Let me apply this to see if the dependencies are taken care of now. If
> so I'll just take it through the clk tree.
>

Any updates on this series.
I could NOT see them at
http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/mturquette/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/clk-next


> Regards,
> Mike
>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Yadwinder Singh Brar
>> <yadi.brar01@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Kukjin / Mike,
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
>> >> Mike Turquette wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-06-24 08:02:39)
>> >>> > On 06/22/13 01:31, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Or I can take this through the clk tree. Either way is fine.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > Mike, please go ahead taking this series into the clk tree for 3.11.
>> >>>
>> >>> Actually it might be better for you to take it. Patch #5 relies on
>> >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c which only exists in the samsung
>> >>> tree.  It was introduced by commit 1609027f, "clk: exynos5420: register
>> >>> clocks using common clock framework".
>> >>>
>> >> Yes, you're right. It depends on soc-exynos5420 stuff in samsung tree.
>> >>
>> >>> And these patches need to be applied with some fuzz to the clk tree due
>> >>> to other changes which are not in my tree and only present in yours.
>> >>>
>> >>> The best two options are either for you to take this series or it can be
>> >>> rebased on top of clk-next, after which I'll apply it.
>> >>>
>> >> Let me try to send this series via samsung tree for v3.11 but I'm not sure because it's a little bit late for arm-soc tree.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for your ack, just note I will send to arm-soc tonight in my time.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Can we get this series merge now in any of trees.
>> > Please let me if its required to rebase it.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Yadwinder

[PATCH v7 00/11] Add generic set_rate clk_ops for PLL35xx and PLL36xx for samsung SoCs

[Mike Turquette]

Quoting Vikas Sajjan (2013-07-30 06:13:04)
> Hi Mike,
> 
> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:56 AM, Mike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org> wrote:
> > Quoting Vikas Sajjan (2013-07-21 23:15:27)
> >> Hi Kukjin / Mike,
> >>
> >> Can you apply this series
> >
> > Let me apply this to see if the dependencies are taken care of now. If
> > so I'll just take it through the clk tree.
> >
> 
> Any updates on this series.
> I could NOT see them at
> http://git.linaro.org/gitweb?p=people/mturquette/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/clk-next

You should see it now.

Regards,
Mike

> 
> 
> > Regards,
> > Mike
> >
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 7:10 PM, Yadwinder Singh Brar
> >> <yadi.brar01@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > Hi Kukjin / Mike,
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com> wrote:
> >> >> Mike Turquette wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Quoting Kukjin Kim (2013-06-24 08:02:39)
> >> >>> > On 06/22/13 01:31, Mike Turquette wrote:
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > Acked-by: Mike Turquette<mturquette@linaro.org>
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > > Or I can take this through the clk tree. Either way is fine.
> >> >>> > >
> >> >>> > Mike, please go ahead taking this series into the clk tree for 3.11.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Actually it might be better for you to take it. Patch #5 relies on
> >> >>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5420.c which only exists in the samsung
> >> >>> tree.  It was introduced by commit 1609027f, "clk: exynos5420: register
> >> >>> clocks using common clock framework".
> >> >>>
> >> >> Yes, you're right. It depends on soc-exynos5420 stuff in samsung tree.
> >> >>
> >> >>> And these patches need to be applied with some fuzz to the clk tree due
> >> >>> to other changes which are not in my tree and only present in yours.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> The best two options are either for you to take this series or it can be
> >> >>> rebased on top of clk-next, after which I'll apply it.
> >> >>>
> >> >> Let me try to send this series via samsung tree for v3.11 but I'm not sure because it's a little bit late for arm-soc tree.
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks for your ack, just note I will send to arm-soc tonight in my time.
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> > Can we get this series merge now in any of trees.
> >> > Please let me if its required to rebase it.
> >> >
> >> > Regards,
> >> > Yadwinder