From: mjg59@srcf.ucam.org (Matthew Garrett)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Documentation: arm: [U]EFI runtime services
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:38:01 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130627143801.GB12900@srcf.ucam.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130627090050.GC18151@rocoto.smurfnet.nu>
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 11:00:50AM +0200, Leif Lindholm wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 02:32:19AM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > We can probably get away with that now, but it does risk us ending up
> > with some firmware that expects to run in physical mode (boards designed
> > for Linux) and some firmware that expects to run in virtual mode (boards
> > designed for Windows). The degree of lockdown in the Windows ecosystem
> > at present means it's not a real problem at the moment, but if that ever
> > changes we're going to risk incompatibility.
>
> Is there anything preventing calling SetVirtualAddressMap() with a
> 1:1 map?
No, but we've seen bugs as a result on some x86 systems. As far as the
spec, though, you're fine.
--
Matthew Garrett | mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-27 14:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-06-25 18:10 [PATCH 0/4] arm: [U]EFI runtime services support Leif Lindholm
2013-06-25 18:11 ` [PATCH 1/4] Documentation: arm: [U]EFI runtime services Leif Lindholm
2013-06-25 18:46 ` Christopher Covington
2013-06-25 23:42 ` Stephen Warren
2013-06-26 13:20 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-26 13:53 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-06-26 13:59 ` Matt Fleming
2013-06-26 14:38 ` James Bottomley
2013-06-27 1:32 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-27 6:23 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-27 6:33 ` James Bottomley
2013-06-27 14:37 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-27 15:09 ` James Bottomley
2013-06-27 15:37 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-27 17:28 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-27 14:54 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-27 15:04 ` James Bottomley
2013-06-27 18:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-06-27 9:00 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-06-27 14:38 ` Matthew Garrett [this message]
2013-06-27 18:32 ` H. Peter Anvin
2013-06-26 18:32 ` Stephen Warren
2013-06-26 19:31 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-06-27 18:04 ` Stephen Warren
2013-06-27 20:11 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-26 13:13 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-26 14:04 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-06-26 14:35 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-27 14:22 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-30 3:21 ` Rob Landley
2013-06-25 18:11 ` [PATCH 2/4] x86: efi: break efi_lookup_mapped_addr out to generic code Leif Lindholm
2013-06-26 13:30 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-26 13:32 ` Matt Fleming
2013-06-26 14:11 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-06-26 14:40 ` Matt Fleming
2013-06-25 18:11 ` [PATCH 3/4] arm: Add [U]EFI runtime services support Leif Lindholm
2013-06-25 18:20 ` Matthew Garrett
2013-06-26 13:46 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-26 13:46 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-26 13:54 ` Matt Fleming
2013-06-26 14:15 ` Borislav Petkov
2013-06-26 14:35 ` Grant Likely
2013-06-26 14:22 ` Leif Lindholm
2013-06-25 18:11 ` [PATCH 4/4] init: efi: arm: enable (U)EFI runtime services on arm Leif Lindholm
2013-06-26 13:24 ` Grant Likely
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130627143801.GB12900@srcf.ucam.org \
--to=mjg59@srcf.ucam.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).