From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: MTD EEPROM support and driver integration
Date: Sat, 6 Jul 2013 14:01:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130706120112.GA11069@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5811519.oHVuMujf0I@wuerfel>
Hi,
I'm not exactly sure on what happened to the previous mail that has been
sent empty, but anyway:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 11:18:00AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Saturday 06 July 2013 10:28:04 Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > a) like interrupts, regs, dmas, clocks, pinctrl, reset, pwm: fixed property names
> > >
> > > regmap = <&at25 0xstart 0xlen>;
> > > regmap-names = "mac-address";
> > >
> > > b) like gpio, regulator: variable property names
> > >
> > > mac-storage = <&at25 0xstart 0xlen>;
> > >
> > > It's unfortunate that we already have examples of both. They are largely
> > > equivalent, but the tendency is towards the first.
> >
> > I don't have a strong feeling for one against another, so whatever works
> > best. Both solutions will be a huge improvement anyway
> >
> > Just out of curiosity, is there any advantages besides having a fixed
> > property name to the first solution?
>
> I think it's mostly for consistency: trying to get most subsystems to
> do it the same way to make it easier for people to write dts files.
>
> A lesser point is that it simplifies the driver code if you don't
> have to pass a name.
So that leave us with mainly one path to achieve this goal:
- Add a regmap-mtd backend
- Add DT parsing code for regmap
- Move the EEPROM drivers from misc to mtd
What other option would we have?
I also thought about writing an EEPROM framework of its own, but the
line is really thin between a large EEPROM and say a small SPI
dataflash, which would make it pretty hard to choose between such a
framework and MTD.
Thanks,
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20130706/cc19dacb/attachment.sig>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-06 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-05 20:11 MTD EEPROM support and driver integration Maxime Ripard
2013-07-05 21:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-07-05 22:23 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-07-05 22:33 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-07-06 8:28 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-07-06 9:18 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-07-06 11:43 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-07-06 12:01 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2013-07-06 19:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-07-06 19:55 ` Jean Delvare
2013-07-07 7:15 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-07-08 8:36 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-08 21:04 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-07-08 8:34 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-08 20:25 ` Maxime Ripard
2013-07-09 14:55 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-11 17:05 ` Maxime Ripard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130706120112.GA11069@lukather \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).