From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: khali@linux-fr.org (Jean Delvare) Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 09:50:24 +0200 Subject: [lm-sensors] [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dt: t30 cardhu: add dt entry for lm90 In-Reply-To: <51DA6BD4.1040300@nvidia.com> References: <1372928979-26938-1-git-send-email-wni@nvidia.com> <1372928979-26938-2-git-send-email-wni@nvidia.com> <51D70483.70203@wwwdotorg.org> <51DA6BD4.1040300@nvidia.com> Message-ID: <20130708095024.041a6d57@endymion.delvare> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 8 Jul 2013 15:35:48 +0800, Wei Ni wrote: > On 07/06/2013 01:38 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > > On 07/04/2013 03:09 AM, Wei Ni wrote: > >> Enable thermal sensor lm90 for t30 cardhu. > > > >> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-cardhu.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30-cardhu.dtsi > > > >> + nct1008: nct1008 { > >> + compatible = "lm90,nct1008"; > > > > "lm90" isn't a valid vendor prefix. I believe the value you want is > > "onnn,nct1008". Same comment for patch 2/2. > > The lm90 doesn't support device tree very well. I doubt it, but if this is the case, then please fix it, instead of working the problem around in a different place. > In the DT, we need to > named as "lm90" so that the lm90 driver can be loaded, Not that I am an expert with regards to DT, but this doesn't make any sense to me. AFAIK DT is about devices, not which drivers handle them. > and we also need > to add "nct1008" to indicate this is the nct1008 device, so that the > lm90 driver can be loaded with the right i2c_device_id->driver_data. > > I set the " compatible = "lm90,nct1008" ", this is the simplest way, and > we doesn't need to change the lm90.c. There's no problem with changing the lm90 driver, if this is the right thing to do. -- Jean Delvare