From: ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com (Ezequiel Garcia)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v7 11/22] PCI: mvebu: Adapt to the new device tree layout
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 17:22:03 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130709202201.GC2340@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAErSpo5uhDRWNnEvTewU=RnV7VW_em=PbvyQZh2PkEy8pCsGwg@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:50:47PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:41:13PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote:
> >> From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> >>
> >> The new device tree layout encodes the window's target ID and attribute
> >> in the PCIe controller node's ranges property. This allows to parse
> >> such entries to obtain such information and use the recently introduced
> >> MBus API to create the windows, instead of using the current name based
> >> scheme.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>
> >> ---
> >> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/mvebu-pci.txt | 145 ++++++++++++++++-----
> >> drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c | 113 +++++++++++-----
> >> 2 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
> >
> > After my conversation with tglx a few days ago [1], I'm even more
> > inclined to push patches like this to the correct maintainers. However,
> > looking at how this patch fits into the series, it may be better if we
> > take it through mvebu/arm-soc with your Ack.
> >
> > It depends on the patches before it, and the patches after it depend on
> > it. Unless I'm reading this wrong, I would have a branch that you would
> > pull and base this patch on, which I would then pull and base the rest
> > of the series on. Reshuffling the series to alleviate this wouldn't work
> > in this case. :-/
> >
> > Are you ok with that? (fwiw, the code changes are isolated to
> > pci-mvebu.c)
>
> Yep, that makes sense to me. With dependencies both ways, it just
> seems much simpler to have you push it via mvebu/arm-soc.
>
> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>
Great, Thanks!
Arnd, Jason (Gunthorpe):
So, how does this look? If there isn't anything left, would you mind
acking this so Jason (Cooper) can queue it somewhere?
Thanks!
--
Ezequiel Garc?a, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-09 20:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-09 16:41 [PATCH v7 00/22] MBus DT binding: The return of PCIe Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 01/22] memory: mvebu-devbus: Remove address decoding window workaround Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 02/22] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add new API for window creation Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 03/22] ARM: kirkwood: Move to ID based MBus " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 04/22] ARM: mv78xx0: Move to ID based " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 05/22] ARM: orion5x: " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 06/22] ARM: dove: " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 07/22] bus: mvebu-mbus: Factor out initialization details Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 08/22] bus: mvebu-mbus: Introduce device tree binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 09/22] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add static window allocation to the DT binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 10/22] bus: mvebu-mbus: Add new API for the PCIe memory and IO aperture Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 11/22] PCI: mvebu: Adapt to the new device tree layout Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 18:20 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-09 18:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2013-07-09 18:54 ` Jason Cooper
2013-07-09 20:22 ` Ezequiel Garcia [this message]
2013-07-09 19:07 ` Stephen Warren
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 12/22] bus: mvebu-mbus: Remove the no longer used name-based API Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 13/22] bus: mvebu-mbus: Remove name -> target, attribute mapping tables Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 14/22] bus: mvebu-mbus: Update main description Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 15/22] bus: mvebu-mbus: Factorize Armada 370/XP data structures Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 16/22] ARM: mvebu: Remove the harcoded BootROM window allocation Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 17/22] ARM: mvebu: Initialize MBus using the DT binding Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 18/22] ARM: mvebu: Use the preprocessor on Armada 370/XP device tree files Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 19/22] ARM: mvebu: Add MBus to Armada 370/XP device tree Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 20/22] ARM: mvebu: Add BootROM " Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 21/22] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada 370/XP DeviceBus device tree nodes Ezequiel Garcia
2013-07-09 16:41 ` [PATCH v7 22/22] ARM: mvebu: Relocate Armada 370/XP PCIe " Ezequiel Garcia
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130709202201.GC2340@localhost \
--to=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox