From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com (Ezequiel Garcia) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 17:22:03 -0300 Subject: [PATCH v7 11/22] PCI: mvebu: Adapt to the new device tree layout In-Reply-To: References: <1373388084-29520-1-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> <1373388084-29520-12-git-send-email-ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com> <20130709182026.GJ11908@titan.lakedaemon.net> Message-ID: <20130709202201.GC2340@localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 12:50:47PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Jason Cooper wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:41:13PM -0300, Ezequiel Garcia wrote: > >> From: Thomas Petazzoni > >> > >> The new device tree layout encodes the window's target ID and attribute > >> in the PCIe controller node's ranges property. This allows to parse > >> such entries to obtain such information and use the recently introduced > >> MBus API to create the windows, instead of using the current name based > >> scheme. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni > >> --- > >> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/mvebu-pci.txt | 145 ++++++++++++++++----- > >> drivers/pci/host/pci-mvebu.c | 113 +++++++++++----- > >> 2 files changed, 193 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) > > > > After my conversation with tglx a few days ago [1], I'm even more > > inclined to push patches like this to the correct maintainers. However, > > looking at how this patch fits into the series, it may be better if we > > take it through mvebu/arm-soc with your Ack. > > > > It depends on the patches before it, and the patches after it depend on > > it. Unless I'm reading this wrong, I would have a branch that you would > > pull and base this patch on, which I would then pull and base the rest > > of the series on. Reshuffling the series to alleviate this wouldn't work > > in this case. :-/ > > > > Are you ok with that? (fwiw, the code changes are isolated to > > pci-mvebu.c) > > Yep, that makes sense to me. With dependencies both ways, it just > seems much simpler to have you push it via mvebu/arm-soc. > > Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas > Great, Thanks! Arnd, Jason (Gunthorpe): So, how does this look? If there isn't anything left, would you mind acking this so Jason (Cooper) can queue it somewhere? Thanks! -- Ezequiel Garc?a, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android Engineering http://free-electrons.com