linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: linux@arm.linux.org.uk (Russell King - ARM Linux)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Seg fault occurs when running statically compiled binary from kernel using call_usermodehelper
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2013 19:52:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130710185200.GX24642@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130710163410.GA30514@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 05:34:11PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> Ok, I've finally got to the bottom of this, but I'm not sure on the best way
> to fix it.

I don't think you have!  You need to look back at the older ARM kernels
to really get to the bottom of this...

> The issue is that libc expects r0 to contain a function pointer
> to be invoked at exit (rtld_fini), to clean up after a dynamic linker. If
> this pointer is NULL, then it is ignored. We actually zero this pointer in
> our ELF_PLAT_INIT macro.
> 
> At the same time, we have this strange code called next from the ARM ELF
> loader:
> 
> 	regs->ARM_r2 = stack[2];	/* r2 (envp) */			\
> 	regs->ARM_r1 = stack[1];	/* r1 (argv) */			\
> 	regs->ARM_r0 = stack[0];	/* r0 (argc) */			\
> 
> which puts argc into r0.

You're sort of right.  It dates from the days when we had a.out binaries,
those required argc, argv and envp in r0/r1/r2 - and ARM kernels carried
this hack in  binfmt_aout.c to make it work in conjunction with the above:

static int load_aout_binary(struct linux_binprm * bprm)
{
...
        start_thread(regs, ex.a_entry, current->mm->start_stack);
#ifndef __arm__
        return 0;
#else
        return regs->ARM_r0;
#endif
}

ELF, on the other hand, never had that hack - ELF has always been zero
in r0, and it's always retrieved the argc/argv/envp off the stack.

As the above hack got dropped from the kernel (I don't think it ever made
it into mainline), I think we should be safe getting rid of this
initialization of regs->ARM_r0 to r2, leaving them all as zeros.

We should probably also remove the selection of HAVE_AOUT from
arch/arm/Kconfig too as this definitely won't work with any recent
kernel (certainly not without binfmt_aout.c hacked in the above way.)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-07-10 18:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <CAOiN93mGTu9w9rVNCrbbH1sccXY9VJhaCmg+dS7Rk9mMgKHBaA@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found] ` <CAOiN93=Nx77RkbNuEJMV617MjV5+GmorF0G3vyLy1SwQcuCs+g@mail.gmail.com>
2013-07-10 10:42   ` Seg fault occurs when running statically compiled binary from kernel using call_usermodehelper Ashish Sangwan
2013-07-10 16:34     ` Will Deacon
2013-07-10 18:09       ` Dave Martin
2013-07-10 18:52       ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2013-07-11 10:54         ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130710185200.GX24642@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).