linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Don't complain in gic_get_cpumask() if UP system
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 05:10:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130712121023.GB27430@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130712111322.GC3213@e102654-lin.cambridge.arm.com>

On 07/12, Javi Merino wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 12:39:33AM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > In a uniprocessor implementation the interrupt processor targets
> > registers are read-as-zero/write-ignored (RAZ/WI). Unfortunately
> > gic_get_cpumask() will print a critical message saying
> > 
> >  GIC CPU mask not found - kernel will fail to boot.
> > 
> > if these registers all read as zero, but there won't actually be
> > a problem on uniprocessor systems and the kernel will boot just
> > fine. Skip this check if we're running a UP kernel or if we
> > detect that the hardware only supports a single processor.
> > 
> > Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > ---
> > 
> > Maybe we should just drop the check entirely? It looks like it may
> > just be debug code that won't ever trigger in practice, even on the
> > 11MPCore that caused this code to be introduced.
> 
> I agree, we should drop the check.  It's annoying in uniprocessors and
> unlikely to be found in the real world unless your gic entry in the dt
> is wrong.
> 

Ok. How about this?

----8<-----
Subject: [PATCH v2] irqchip: gic: Don't complain in gic_get_cpumask()

In a uniprocessor implementation the interrupt processor targets
registers are read-as-zero/write-ignored (RAZ/WI). Unfortunately
gic_get_cpumask() will print a critical message saying

 GIC CPU mask not found - kernel will fail to boot.

if these registers all read as zero, but there won't actually be
a problem on uniprocessor systems and the kernel will boot just
fine. Remove this check because if you're on a multiprocessor
system it's unlikely to be printed unless your DT is wrong or
your hardware is broken.

Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Javi Merino <javi.merino@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
---
 drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index 19ceaa60..4fbcea9 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -368,9 +368,6 @@ static u8 gic_get_cpumask(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
 			break;
 	}
 
-	if (!mask)
-		pr_crit("GIC CPU mask not found - kernel will fail to boot.\n");
-
 	return mask;
 }
 
-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation



-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

  reply	other threads:[~2013-07-12 12:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-07-05 23:39 [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Don't complain in gic_get_cpumask() if UP system Stephen Boyd
2013-07-12 11:13 ` Javi Merino
2013-07-12 12:10   ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2013-07-17 21:53     ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-17 22:34       ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-17 22:36         ` Stephen Boyd
2013-07-17 22:53           ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-07-17 23:06             ` Stephen Boyd
2013-08-22 18:43               ` Stephen Boyd
2013-08-22 18:59                 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-23  4:35                   ` Stephen Boyd
2013-08-23  4:51                     ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-08-23  9:15                       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-07-20  7:27 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-07-23 17:01   ` Stephen Boyd
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-01-31  0:43 Stephen Boyd
2015-01-31  7:09 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-02-12  3:51   ` Nishanth Menon
2015-02-01 21:25 ` Stefan Agner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130712121023.GB27430@codeaurora.org \
    --to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).