From: peter.chen@freescale.com (Peter Chen)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] ARM: imx: clk-pllv3: move the timeout just before the comparison
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:47:18 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130715014717.GA23444@nchen-desktop> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130714183347.GJ12139@pengutronix.de>
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 08:33:47PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 08:58:48AM +0800, Peter Chen wrote:
> > It can let the timeout value be more precise.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Uwe Kleine-K?nig <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> Whoever applies this patch, can you make the ? an ? (or at least "oe")?
Oh, sorry.
>
> Peter, does this fix anything for you? Would be nice to mention that in
> the commit log.
The root cause of this PLL lock timeout problem is:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=137109340222931&w=2
If causes the jiffies is not precise sometimes. This commit is just an
improvement.
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Chen <peter.chen@freescale.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c | 3 ++-
> > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c
> > index a9fad5f..e2c026f 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/clk-pllv3.c
> > @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ struct clk_pllv3 {
> > static int clk_pllv3_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > {
> > struct clk_pllv3 *pll = to_clk_pllv3(hw);
> > - unsigned long timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(10);
> > + unsigned long timeout;
> > u32 val;
> >
> > val = readl_relaxed(pll->base);
> > @@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ static int clk_pllv3_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > val &= ~BM_PLL_POWER;
> > writel_relaxed(val, pll->base);
> >
> > + timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(10);
> > /* Wait for PLL to lock */
> > while (!(readl_relaxed(pll->base) & BM_PLL_LOCK))
> > if (time_after(jiffies, timeout))
> > --
> > 1.7.0.4
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K?nig |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
>
--
Best Regards,
Peter Chen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-15 1:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-14 0:58 [PATCH 1/1] ARM: imx: clk-pllv3: move the timeout just before the comparison Peter Chen
2013-07-14 18:33 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-07-15 1:47 ` Peter Chen [this message]
2013-07-15 1:53 ` Fabio Estevam
2013-07-15 6:36 ` Sascha Hauer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130715014717.GA23444@nchen-desktop \
--to=peter.chen@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).