From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni) Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:17:12 +0200 Subject: v3.10 - big endian core support In-Reply-To: <51E3CE41.5010807@codethink.co.uk> References: <20130712134726.0a909165@skate> <51DFEF75.8080600@codethink.co.uk> <20130714215325.GB7382@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com> <51E3ACD0.8040209@codethink.co.uk> <20130715103658.068ac6b7@skate> <51E3CE41.5010807@codethink.co.uk> Message-ID: <20130715151712.69f2cf8d@skate> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Dear Ben Dooks, On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:26:09 +0100, Ben Dooks wrote: > I've pushed out two new branches on git.baserock.org/delta/linux.git > as: > baserock/311/be/core-v2 > baserock/311/be/atags-v2 I've tested baserock/311/be/core-v2, after rebasing it on top of 3.11-rc1. I've tested the following combination on an Armada XP board: little endian ARM, big endian ARM, little endian Thumb2 and big endian Thumb2. They all worked fine. There were minor conflicts in arch/arm/kernel/sleep.S and arch/arm/mach-mvebu/headsmp.S when doing the rebase on top of 3.11-rc1, but nothing major. Ben, do you have the time to rebase on 3.11-rc1 and post the patches for merging? Thanks! Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com