From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: akpm@linux-foundation.org (Andrew Morton) Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:47:27 -0700 Subject: [PATCH -next 2/2] kbuild: fix for updated LZ4 tool with the new streaming format In-Reply-To: <51E472D4.5060307@zytor.com> References: <1367829775-4434-1-git-send-email-kyungsik.lee@lge.com> <1367829775-4434-2-git-send-email-kyungsik.lee@lge.com> <20130712075602.GA4002@gmail.com> <20130715150342.35f7620ffe0835e3e2bc37d0@linux-foundation.org> <51E472D4.5060307@zytor.com> Message-ID: <20130716004727.b60b2c96.akpm@linux-foundation.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 15:08:20 -0700 "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > On 07/15/2013 03:03 PM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > > I don't know how to do this. Any suggestions? > > > > It has to be done at `make config' time. We'd need to probe for the > > presence of lz4c and then.... what? > > > > Is there any precedent for this? > > > > I don't think we can just ignore the absence of lz4c - the user has > > selected a config which his system cannot build. The problem lies > > within randconfig itself. > > > > We keep running over the need to be able to have kconfig run tests on > the build system (for toolchain support or for optional tools needed); > running them in the Makefiles (i.e. at Kbuild time) is simply too late. > Would it make sense to extend Kconfig's `depends'? depends on $(shell-command) I don't know how practical that would be to implement...