From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: cavokz@gmail.com (Domenico Andreoli) Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 01:42:56 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: bcm4760: Add platform infrastructure In-Reply-To: <20130721002713.512199844@gmail.com> References: <20130721002320.730568671@gmail.com> <20130721002713.512199844@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20130721234256.GA5537@glitch> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org + Christian Daudt (Christian, you've not an entry in MAINTAINERS) On Sun, Jul 21, 2013 at 02:23:21AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: > From: Domenico Andreoli > > Platform infrastructure for the Broadcom BCM4760 based ARM11 SoCs. > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > Signed-off-by: Domenico Andreoli > --- > Index: b/arch/arm/Makefile > =================================================================== > --- a/arch/arm/Makefile > +++ b/arch/arm/Makefile > @@ -147,6 +147,7 @@ textofs-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MSM8960) := 0x0020 > machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91) += at91 > machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM) += bcm > machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM2835) += bcm2835 > +machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_BCM4760) += bcm > machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_CLPS711X) += clps711x > machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_CNS3XXX) += cns3xxx > machine-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI) += davinci I've noticed that enabling both CONFIG_ARCH_BCM and CONFIG_ARCH_BCM4760 makes the linker complain of duplicate symbols. Shouldn't the mach-bcm subdir be included always and let then Makefile therein sort what to build? As I side note, I think this CONFIG_ARCH_BCM option is misnamed, shouldn't be something like CONFIG_ARCH_BCM281XX? It looks about this ARMv7 family only. Thanks, Domenico