From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: lee.jones@linaro.org (Lee Jones) Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 14:41:07 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 01/22] ARM: ux500: Remove '0x's from HREF v60+ DTS file In-Reply-To: <51ED26C6.6000004@newflow.co.uk> References: <1374490361-25769-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> <51ED26C6.6000004@newflow.co.uk> Message-ID: <20130722134107.GB26801@laptop> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Mark Jackson wrote: > On 22/07/13 11:52, Lee Jones wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones > > --- > > arch/arm/boot/dts/hrefv60plus.dts | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/hrefv60plus.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/hrefv60plus.dts > > index 3d580d6..46fd8af 100644 > > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/hrefv60plus.dts > > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/hrefv60plus.dts > > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ > > > > soc { > > i2c at 80110000 { > > - bu21013_tp at 0x5c { > > + bu21013_tp at 5c { > > Just a query ... why this one .... ^^^ ... > > > reset-gpio = <&gpio4 15 0x4>; > > ... and not this one .................................. ^^^ ? > > > }; > > }; > > > > The same for all the other patches in this series. > > If this is by design, it might be worth mentioning why some are > removed and not others. I can't explain why there seems to be inconsistencies between node names and the remaining properties. The best I can do is refer you to the documentation where you can see that this is the standard: Documentation/devicetree/usage-model.txt and http://www.devicetree.org/Device_Tree_Usage -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog