From: konrad.wilk@oracle.com (Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] xen/arm: enable PV control for ARM
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 16:00:20 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130722200020.GT30300@phenom.dumpdata.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1307221545030.4893@kaball.uk.xensource.com>
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:46:34PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 03:09:35PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > On Mon, 22 Jul 2013, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > [Adding Catalin to Cc]
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 11:57:34AM +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > > > Enable power management from the toolstack for ARM guest.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@linaro.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Changes in v3:
> > > > > - Fix condition to compile cpu_hotplug.o
> > > > > Changes in v2:
> > > > > - Don't compile xen/cpu_hotplug.o with ARM64
> > > >
> > > > My arm64 cpu hotplug series is going to be dependent on not compiling
> > > > xen/cpu_hotplug.o. Currently I'm not able to compile an arm64 kernel
> > > > with my patches and Xen support.
> > > >
> > > > How do you intend to push this? I'd like to ensure my cpu hotplug series
> > > > is able to go in for the next merge window.
> > >
> > > This patch does exactly that: it makes sure cpu_hotplug is not compiled
> > > on ARM64.
> >
> > Sorry, what I meant was that my series is going to be entirely dependent
> > on this patch or it'll break bisection. That'll make merging things a
> > little painful as I'll need a stable branch with this patch to base my
> > series upon.
> >
> > Another option would be to split this patch into two parts, one enabling
> > power management and one fixing things up for HOTPLUG_CPU on arm64. That
> > way I could take the arm64 HOTPLUG_CPU fix in my series adding arm64
> > HOTPLUG_CPU support.
> >
> > Would that be acceptable? Have I missed something?
>
> As I am very sensitive to painful merging situations, I think we could
> split the patch in two and send upstream the fix (not compiling
> cpu_hotplug.o on ARM64) in 3.11-rc2 or rc3. Konrad, what do you think?
Sure, prep a patch and send it my way.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-22 20:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-22 10:57 [PATCH v3] xen/arm: enable PV control for ARM Julien Grall
2013-07-22 13:49 ` Mark Rutland
2013-07-22 14:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-07-22 14:39 ` Mark Rutland
2013-07-22 14:46 ` Stefano Stabellini
2013-07-22 20:00 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [this message]
2013-07-22 14:09 ` Stefano Stabellini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130722200020.GT30300@phenom.dumpdata.com \
--to=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).