From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd) Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 11:56:18 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Fix deadlock scenario with smp_send_stop() In-Reply-To: <1373384217-26307-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> References: <1373384217-26307-1-git-send-email-sboyd@codeaurora.org> Message-ID: <20130724185618.GD27761@codeaurora.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 07/09, Stephen Boyd wrote: > If one process calls sys_reboot and that process then stops other > CPUs while those CPUs are within a spin_lock() region we can > potentially encounter a deadlock scenario like below. > > CPU 0 CPU 1 > ----- ----- > spin_lock(my_lock) > smp_send_stop() > handle_IPI() > disable_preemption/irqs > while(1); > > spin_lock(my_lock) <--- Waits forever > > We shouldn't attempt to run any other tasks after we send a stop > IPI to a CPU so disable preemption so that this task runs to > completion. > > Reported-by: Sundarajan Srinivasan > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd > --- > > Resending this patch now that the context has changed. Ping? Shall I put this in the patch tracker? > > arch/arm/kernel/process.c | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c > index 7f1efcd..8bc12d7 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/process.c > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/process.c > @@ -206,6 +206,7 @@ void machine_shutdown(void) > */ > void machine_halt(void) > { > + preempt_disable(); > smp_send_stop(); > > local_irq_disable(); > @@ -220,6 +221,7 @@ void machine_halt(void) > */ > void machine_power_off(void) > { > + preempt_disable(); > smp_send_stop(); > > if (pm_power_off) > @@ -239,6 +241,7 @@ void machine_power_off(void) > */ > void machine_restart(char *cmd) > { > + preempt_disable(); > smp_send_stop(); > > arm_pm_restart(reboot_mode, cmd); -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation