From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mingo@kernel.org (Ingo Molnar)
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:05:02 +0200
Subject: [PATCH, re-send] Always trap on BUG()
In-Reply-To: <51EF1936.7090801@asianux.com>
References: <201307051738.35930.arnd@arndb.de>
 <20130715151612.9499c2b2ad40e88d183a4600@linux-foundation.org>
 <20130715222755.GY24642@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
 <51E47924.9030005@zytor.com> <20130723093628.GC19786@gmail.com>
 <51EF1936.7090801@asianux.com>
Message-ID: <20130725220502.GI18254@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

* Chen Gang <gang.chen@asianux.com> wrote:

> On 07/23/2013 05:36 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > (the crazies can keep a separate patch to remove even more of BUG() to win 
> > a K or two.)
> > 
> 
> Excuse me, my English is not quite well, I do not quite understand your
> meaning, could you please repeat again in details or say more clearly ?

I meant: those people who'd like to have the tiny 
additional space savings offered by !CONFIG_BUG (and are 
crazy enough to live with non-determinism in exchange for a 
measly payment of 1 KB), can apply a separate, out of tree 
patch just fine and don't need upstream kernel support.

Thanks,

	Ingo