From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jason@lakedaemon.net (Jason Cooper) Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 07:49:40 -0400 Subject: [PATCHv5 08/11] ARM: pci: add ->add_bus() and ->remove_bus() hooks to hw_pci In-Reply-To: <20130726101305.22a5c892@skate> References: <1373889167-27878-1-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <1373889167-27878-9-git-send-email-thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com> <20130725165659.GB27802@dhcp-172-17-186-34.nvidia.com> <20130726101305.22a5c892@skate> Message-ID: <20130726114940.GD29916@titan.lakedaemon.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:13:05AM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Thierry Reding, > > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:57:00 -0700, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 01:52:44PM +0200, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > > Some PCI drivers may need to adjust the pci_bus structure after it has > > > been allocated by the Linux PCI core. The PCI core allows > > > architectures to implement the pcibios_add_bus() and > > > pcibios_remove_bus() for this purpose. This commit therefore extends > > > the hw_pci and pci_sys_data structures of the ARM PCI core to allow > > > PCI drivers to register ->add_bus() and ->remove_bus() in hw_pci, > > > which will get called when a bus is added or removed from the system. > > > > > > This will be used for example by the Marvell PCIe driver to connect a > > > particular PCI bus with its corresponding MSI chip to handle Message > > > Signaled Interrupts. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni > > > Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding > > > --- > > > arch/arm/include/asm/mach/pci.h | 4 ++++ > > > arch/arm/kernel/bios32.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > > > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+) > > > > Hi Russell, > > > > Can we have your Acked-by on this patch so that it can be moved to a > > stable branch along with some of the other patches in this branch that > > both Marvell and Tegra PCIe drivers need? > > I've pinged Russell a few times about this patch already, but haven't > received feedback from him. Do you think I can just go ahead and submit > the patch to Russell's patch system, after fixing the minor nits you > mentioned? When you do that, please ask Russell to place it in a publicly accessible, stable topic branch for us to base off of. thx, Jason.