From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mturquette@linaro.org (Mike Turquette) Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 15:25:01 -0700 Subject: Zynq clk fixes In-Reply-To: References: <51F26716.6030701@monstr.eu> <20130726200703.7598.86150@quantum> Message-ID: <20130726222501.7598.33060@quantum> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Quoting S?ren Brinkmann (2013-07-26 14:11:52) > On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:07:03PM -0700, Mike Turquette wrote: > > Quoting Michal Simek (2013-07-26 05:09:58) > > > Hi Mike, [cc: Arnd and Olof] > > > > > > Soren has found two bug fixes in zynq clk code. > > > Can you please add these two patches to your tree? > > > Will be great if you can add them to v3.11. > > > > > > Arnd, Olof: I expect that all these clock changes should go through Mike. > > > If I am wrong please let me know. > > > > Looks right to me. Do these fix regressions in the current -rc cycle? > > I doubt there are real regressions. But since it's still early in > the release cycle and the driver was added in this merge window, I'd prefer > having it hit a release kernel with these fixes included. I've taken these into clk-fixes and added the following to the changelog for each patch: "This does not fix a specific regression but the clock driver was merged for 3.11-rc1, so best to fix the known bugs before the release." Regards, Mike > > S?ren