From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: moinejf@free.fr (Jean-Francois Moine)
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:38:53 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: Fix r7/r11 confusion when CONFIG_THUMB2_KERNEL=y [OT]
In-Reply-To: <20130730092517.GB2478@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1373685501-1620-1-git-send-email-jld@mozilla.com>
 <20130715135420.GG10000@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
 <20130720044655.GC9433@mozilla.com>
 <20130721213753.GA29879@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
 <20130722185234.GA14519@localhost.localdomain>
 <20130729212140.GB12681@mozilla.com>
 <20130730092517.GB2478@localhost.localdomain>
Message-ID: <20130730113853.46cbb00a@armhf>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:25:18 +0100
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com> wrote:

> The pragmatic route is less contraversial and lower overhead: even though
> it's not correct as per the ABI, GCC is the only supported compiler for
> building the kernel anyway.

BTW, kernels compiled with gcc-4.8 don't work.

Did anybody succeed with clang?

-- 
Ken ar c'henta?	|	      ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef		|		http://moinejf.free.fr/