From: htejun@gmail.com (Tejun Heo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] chipidea: Use devm_request_irq()
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 06:41:25 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130731104125.GF2810@htj.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130731102853.GD1754@pengutronix.de>
On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:28:53PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K?nig wrote:
> Well, you cannot avoid assuming that the irq is still active when your
> driver's remove callback is called. But I agree about crappyness at the
> end of the destruction path. The problem is that crap is as easy as:
>
> probe(..)
> {
> clk = devm_get_clk(...);
> clk_prepare_enable(clk);
> writel(1, base + IRQENABLE);
> devm_request_irq(...);
> }
>
> remove(..)
> {
> writel(0, base + IRQENABLE);
> clk_disable_unprepare(clk);
> }
>
> and I think there are more and more drivers doing that.
Oh, so, the problem is that the driver is mixing devm and non-devm
resource management and ending up messing the order of shutdown?
Well, the obvious solution is using devm for clk too. devm does
provide constructs to build custom destruction sequence so that such
calls can be mixed but it's a bit of hassle and mostly meant for
driver midlayers (libata, firewire, usb and so on) so that they can
provide nicely wrapped init/exit helpers for low level drivers.
In general, partial devm conversion can easily lead to subtle shutdown
order problems and it's best to go all the way.
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-07-31 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1375232669-27846-1-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <1375232669-27846-2-git-send-email-festevam@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20130731073306.GZ1754@pengutronix.de>
[not found] ` <20130731082054.GF8540@nchen-desktop>
[not found] ` <20130731084645.GB1754@pengutronix.de>
[not found] ` <20130731090512.GD9858@sirena.org.uk>
2013-07-31 9:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] chipidea: Use devm_request_irq() Uwe Kleine-König
2013-07-31 9:54 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-31 10:28 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2013-07-31 10:41 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2013-07-31 11:18 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-31 11:32 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-31 11:50 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-31 11:55 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-31 13:27 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-31 13:42 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-31 13:57 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-31 14:07 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-31 15:25 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-31 15:29 ` Tejun Heo
2013-07-31 16:52 ` Mark Brown
2013-07-31 13:55 ` Peter Chen
2013-07-31 14:15 ` Tejun Heo
2013-08-01 1:33 ` Peter Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130731104125.GF2810@htj.dyndns.org \
--to=htejun@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).